Divya Patni

Everyone can perfom Yoga

Many yoga studios and local gyms offer yoga classes that are open to all generations and levels of strength. It’s fun to walk into a room full of young people, athletes, middle-aged mothers, older men, and solid foods and bodybuilders. Everyone can feel welcome and included and, unlike other games or classes focused on niche clients, yoga tends to offer open arms. Whether you like “Om” or can’t stand the word “yogi”; whether you are 92, 53, or even 12, yoga can help you.

This is how it encourages our health

Yoga is not just about working out, it’s about a healthy lifestyle. Yoga practice allows students to find peace in a world dominated by chaos. The peace and quiet that comes from training that focuses on loving everyone.

Breathing habits and deep meditation on Yoga help to promote inner transformation from the to-do list, the needs of children and spouses, financial worries, and relationships struggling in something less than the problems you face. Yoga helps relieve stress and distort the mind, helping you to stay focused.

Different faces of yoga

One of the benefits of yoga is that you can choose a yoga style tailored to your lifestyle, such as hot yoga, power yoga, relaxing yoga, baby work yoga, etc. Whether you prefer to practice at home, in a private session, while watching a DVD or a studio or gym, there are many options to suit your goals and needs.

If you are a beginner of yoga, hatha yoga, which focuses on the basic exit at a relaxed pace, it can be good for you. If you want to increase energy by using more of your body’s resistance, energy yoga may be right for you. When you are ready for a deep practice, Bikram, also called “hot yoga,” may be what you are looking for. In Bikram yoga, room temperature is maintained at about 105 degrees Fahrenheit [105 ° C], leading to the elimination of toxins from the human body through increased sweat production. No matter your fitness level, fat percentage, or health history, yoga has your own style.

Strength advantages and flexibility of Yoga

Yoga’s focus on strength training and flexibility is an incredible benefit to your body. The postures are meant to strengthen your body from the inside out, so you don’t just look good, you feel good, too. Each of the yoga poses is built to reinforce the muscles around the spine, the very center of your body, which is the core from which everything else operates. When the core is working properly, posture is improved, thus alleviating back, shoulder, and neck pain.

The digestive system gets back on track when the stretching in yoga is coupled with a healthy, organic diet, which can relieve constipation, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and acid reflux. Another one of the benefits of yoga is that stretching and holding postures also causes muscles to lengthen, which gives the body a longer, leaner look.

Allover Power of Yoga

Isometric exercise is one of the best ways to build spinal strength. Isometric, dubbed “the same” and “the same length,” simply translates holding one position without moving. The power of yoga uses isometric exercises and other exercises designed to make the spine and back strong. Flexibility and firmness from the depths of your heart, so it is important to train this area of ​​the body. Also, you can increase the strength and health of your whole body. A high temperature is often used in this practice to help keep the tissues warm and to release more toxins from the body.

Chapter III of Indian Penal Code, 1980 defines punishment for various offences. Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code sets out different kinds of punishments which are awarded to convicts for crime by the courts. These are imprisonment for life, rigorous or simple imprisonment, forfeiture of property, fine and death penalty (also known as capital punishment). Yes, capital punishment is a legal penalty in India. It is an integral part of criminal justice system in India but it is highly debated. All the punishment is based on the same proposition i.e. there must be penalty wrongdoing and the person who has done wrong should suffer for it also it is a common belief that inflicting punishment on wrongdoers discourages other from doing wrong. But with the increasing strength of human rights movement all across the world, the existence of capital punishment is questioned as immoral and extreme. In spite of many organizations protesting for the nullification of death sentence, it is still being executed in different countries. The profounder of death penalty argued that it will act as a deterrent against crimes in the society and it is economical than keeping the convicts behind the bars. On the other hand, some might argue that, punishment in present context must be more reformative than retributive. The UN in its Charter of Rights has declared death penalty or capital punishment as a crime against humanity and had also asked its member countries to put an end to it. One of the member countries of the UN – India, still carries out capital punishment in “rarest of the rare” cases even though the Constitution of India has stated that the government has no right to take the life of any person as per article 21. A majority of countries in the world has now abandoned the use of the death penalty but the world has not yet amicably come forward against its use.

However, the number of countries carrying out the death penalty is declining and it is possible that worldwide opinion and pressure will gradually influence all countries to abolish this practice. Capital punishment in current scenario of the country trend towards abolition of the death penalty as it has emerged over recent decades.  It will trace the development of capital punishment as a human rights issue in the international forum, and examine recent challenges to the death penalty in India. Death, life imprisonment, simple or rigorous imprisonment, fine and forfeiture of property. In contemporary India, death sentences are only reserved for the rarest of rare case.

However, there is no guideline or structure to define these “rarest of rare” cases. Whenever a Punishment is awarded for the wrong doing there are two main reasons for inflicting such punishment; 1.) One is that the person who committed the wrong must suffer for it. 2.) And, the other one is that inflicting punishment on wrongdoer acts as an example for others. In India deciding the case for death penalty is based on doctrine of “rarest of the rare test” which was stated in the case of Bachan Singh V. State of Punjab. Which means that death penalty will only be awarded in rarest of rare cases only . Further, in the case of Macchi Singh & Others V. State of Punjab the Three Judge Bench followed the decision of Bachan Singh and stated that only in rarest of rare cases when collective conscience of community is in such a way that it will expect the holders of the judicial powers to inflict death penalty then it can be awarded if the murder is committed in an extremely brutal, revolting or dastardly manner so as to arouse intense and extreme indignation of the community. 2.) When a murder of a member of a Scheduled caste is committed which arouse social wrath. 3.) In case of “Bride Burning” or “Dowry Death”. 4.) When the crime is enormous in proportion. 5.) When the victim of murder is ● An Innocent child ● A vulnerable Women or a Person rendered unaided by mature epoch or illness. ● once the injured party is an individual in relation to whom the slaughterer is in point of authority or reliance. Apex court in the case, Macchi Singh v. State of Punjab expanded the finding laid down in Bacchan Singh. Hereunder are certain observations made by the court; “capital punishment can be awarded only in the case of gravest crimes. Circumstances of the offender must be taken into consideration before pronouncing a death sentence”. Jagmohan vs state of UP was the first case dealing with the question of constitutional validity of capital punishment in India. India retains death punishment for a number of serious offences.

Death penalty is no doubt unconstitutional if imposed arbitrarily, capriciously, unreasonably, discriminatorily, freakishly or wantonly, but if it is administered rationally, objectively and judiciously, it will enhance people’s confidence in criminal justice system. thus, the conclusion in the present circumstances of the country, it is required to retain death penalty in rarest of the rare cases. Because if it doesn’t deter the crime, then why do people still seek for commutation and pardon?