Referring to as goal specificity , one of the most empirically validated sets of things for behavior change and that’s thinking about your goals in a very specific way. Many misconceptions till date have marked that if human stimulus doesn’t respond in a rational and encouraging way about their goals and foreseeing them would also a be a huge fiasco in the coming days. Setting your goals using a couple of techniques that can make your goal achievement a lot easier. The specificities of how we all think when we have goals, like some of you may have goals for some of the stuff we mentioned, but to actually actualize those, you have to consider them as goals. The apparent statistic or researches make it clear to the point where the conjectures of goal setting comes to a conclusion. The quantitative specificity with which you define your goal, it turns out really seems to matter. And it matters in the way that you get specific about the task in the way you’re going to do it, that specificity seems to give you a plan of how to enact it. And so, apparently we can see that across a bunch of different studies. The actual upshot is, for whatever goals you’re thinking about, make those goals incredibly specific. Like the who, what, where, when, all those different parts, write them down, see it quantitatively, and that will help you.
PARAMOUNT : knowing what the goal is. It’s this idea that you’re visualizing your positive future outcomes, everything, how awesome it would be once you get your goal , it just gets better and better when you actually brief it. Know where your true authentic interest is. By contrast, if you only think about the obstacles, you dwell on how hard it is then you’re never going to get around to doing anything. However, if you actually take the time, to again, intentionally and effortfully do both, first indulge in how great it would be and then think about what the obstacles are. It turns out that you now have visualized both things that you need to succeed. And this is what mental contrasting is.
