Bryant & Stratton College Online Launches Military Spouse Resource Website www.SalutetoSpouses.com

Just in time for Military Spouse Appreciation Day, which is Friday, May 6, we are excited to announce today the expansion of our website www.SalutetoSpouses.com, as the new go-to resource for education and career news for military spouses.
Bryant & Stratton is proud to be a \”military spouse college\” meaning that we have programs designed to make it easier for military spouses to get an education. Besides the convenience of being able to complete a degree online – perfect for military wives and husbands who may find themselves moving house frequently – we provide other online educational resources for military spouses. In particular, we take pride in our online resource SalutetoSpouses.com. Home of the college’s Salute to Spouses Scholarship, which awards $6,000 towards a Bryant & Stratton College degree to spouses of active duty military personnel, SalutetoSpouses.com is also an online community that military spouses can join to read the latest articles on careers and education as well as participate in a wide variety of forums with their peers.
Edited by a military spouse, with contributing writers who are military wives as well. This unique online resource is sponsored by Bryant & Stratton College’s military relations department and features weekly polls, how to articles, tips, resources, advice columns, personal stories, and financial aid options for military spouses.
“As military spouses, we understand the challenge of earning a degree or navigating the competitive job market while caring for your military family,” said Allison Perkins, Editor at SalutetoSpouses.com. “SalutetoSpouses.com is a community where military spouses can find support, information and resources tailored to their unique needs.”
SalutetoSpouses.com engages its user community on a variety of topics through forums and blogs. Registered community members are also able to receive a monthly newsletter that keeps them aware of new content that has been added to the site that month.
Bryant & Stratton College created the Salute to Spouses scholarship after the U.S. government temporarily suspended and later reinstated a restructured MyCAA in 2010. The expansion of the site builds on the success of the scholarship and increases the resources available to military personnel and their families interested in earning their degree or building a sustainable career.
“We understand the commitment and sacrifices that military spouses make. We are proud to support them with the Salute to Spouses scholarship and now with SalutetoSpouses.com, which will help by providing critical information on career and education issues specific to their experience as a military spouse,” said Ed Dennis, Military Relations Manager at Bryant & Stratton College. “Creating a portable and sustainable career is incredibly important for military spouses and often requires advanced education, but a college degree is now more accessible than ever to military spouses.”
For more information about participating in the Salute to Spouses community and applying for the scholarship visit www.SalutetoSpouses.com and take a look around!

Staff Spotlight: Bernadette O\’Connor, Admissions Representative

A former elementary school teacher, Bernadette has been guiding students through the admissions process for the past 18 months.
Her time teaching fourth grade at an all-boys school instilled a positive attitude that she has carried into her position at Bryant & Stratton as she notes the excitement she often shares with each new student she enrolls. Bernadette’s background in education (she has an English degree from Hilbert College) extends beyond her time in the classroom and the numerous Bryant & Stratton students and alumni she’s worked with. While none have been published, Bernadette has written several children’s books with her son as the main character.
“[The books] chronicle each stage of my son’s life as he was growing up and all the adventures he had,” she explained. “Now that he is grown and starts having children of his own, he can share his own stories with them.”
Among her many other talents, Bernadette also boasts a strong skillset in Kan Jam and horseshoes. Although perhaps her greatest gift is connecting and helping the many students she works with each semester.
What is your favorite thing about working at Bryant & Stratton? I love the people I work with! Equally as much, I enjoy working with the students.  It makes me happy to help someone start their college career.
Is there one student success story that stands out above the rest? I spoke to a woman in November who only wanted information.  She had no intention of enrolling.  I spoke with her for an hour and a half, found out she was scared about starting college as a 42 year old.  I listened and I encouraged her and within two days she was enrolled.  She is now on the Dean’s list!
Give one piece of advice to students as they\’re preparing to start classes. College is not easy; rise to the challenges and don’t get discouraged.  Having a degree is a huge accomplishment and the best investment you can make in yourself.

AVOIDING FRANKEN-SUITE SOFTWARE (ORGANIC VS. ACQUIRED)

For those of us who have been working in and around HR technology for a while, the last two years have been remarkable in terms of the pace and scope of market consolidation.  No fewer than a half dozen significant learning and performance management companies have been acquired by other vendors and are now in various states of being cobbled together, prodded and cajoled into their respective acquirers.
The change in the landscape for the prospective buyer is real. First of all, there are simply fewer names to slap on that RFP list.
Second, there are tangible implications in terms of functional offerings – for example, it seems that every performance or recruiting vendor suddenly got the urge to add an LMS to their suite (hey, learning does matter after all!). Separating talent management vendors on the basis of what silos of functionality they offer just got harder.
However, for buyers, the biggest issue of all might well be this: Is your technology vendor really a Frankenstein patchwork of acquired and merged companies and technologies?  And if so, what does this mean in terms of product and service delivery?

Grilling the Vendors: Key Questions for Buyers to Ask

If you are looking at the market for talent management software today, you’re lucky in the sense that there are fewer options and therefore fewer vendor evaluations to slog through. But the simplicity stops right there. Deeper investigation will likely show many of these companies are actually cobbled together through a lot of recent merger activity.
Some key questions as you navigate the turbid waters of HR tech:
Issue
Questions to Ask Vendors
Integration Points
How are the various pieces of your talent management software connected – pass-throughs, patched data feeds, and work-arounds? For example if the LMS and EPM systems come from different acquisitions, what’s the real story on how they work together?
User Experience
Is the user experience and interface consistent across the talent management system? If not, where does it change? If you click out of succession planning and into performance reviews, for example, does the user interface suddenly change? If so, how will this impact end-user training, engagement, adoption rates and overall experience?
Customer Support
How does the vendor support their products from different legacy software acquisitions? Are there different support teams for the LMS and EPM and succession planning and compensation tools? Does supporting multiple acquired products under one roof raise the overall costs of support?
Reporting & Data
Can the talent management system produce consistent reports from every part of the system? Is the reporting tool the same across the suite? Are the underlying data models the same across the system – and if not, can the vendor explain how this will impact your ability to generate timely and useful reports?
Upgrades & Maintenance
If the talent management system is pieced together, how will this impact product upgrades and enhancements? How are different versions and interfaces synchronized? Can the user interface and data model across the talent management spectrum be upgraded at the same time?
Administration & IT Support
If the system is cobbled together from different user interfaces, administrator interfaces, data models, and customer support teams, does this increase headaches for admins or IT? How many touch points are you going to have to deal with (and what’s the true cost of all that switching around)?

 

Caveat Emptor

The press release that trumpets the announcement of the latest HR technology company merger always includes lofty proclamations about how the new, combined systems will change the world.  But savvy buyers know that that piecing together different software platforms is never as easy as it sounds. 
Integrating multiple software tools (and corporate cultures) under the same roof is hard work – it often takes years to complete, and, even then, the combined system is often a patchwork of different user interfaces, data models, upgrade paths, and customer support options. The lesson? Buyer beware.

Going Organic:   Is This Broccoli or Enterprise Software?

By organic we also mean “homegrown.”  Call it what you like, the idea is software developed in-house and by the same development team over time. The entire talent management suite (from learning to performance to succession to compensation to social networking) is the same software, developed and supported by the same people.
Why does this matter?  Plenty of reasons:
  • One system means tighter functional integration across processes
  • One customer support team for all products
  • One user interface (lower training costs, flatter learning curve)
  • One data model
  • One reporting environment
  • One upgrade and maintenance path
Evaluating enterprise software requires buyers to be ever-vigilant about market dynamics.  It also requires checking under the proverbial hood to make sure you get the real story about a potential software partner.
In the talent management software market today, it might just pay to go organic.

Alpha! Bravo! Charlie! Ed Dennis Joins IAVA\’s Storm the Hill teams fight to end veteran unemployment.

Ed participated in the 2011 Storm the Hill as an individual veteran, not as a representative of the College. He was part of a select group chosen from hundreds of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans across the country that applied to participate in Storm the Hill 2011. The group was made up of individuals with a diverse array of military service and personal experience who offered lawmakers a unique understanding of the issues facing the veterans’ community. Bryant & Stratton College Online is proud of his dedication to the veterans’ community as well as active-duty and military students. Read more about his Storm the Hill 2011 experience below.
I just returned from actively participating in Storm the Hill 2011: (www.stormthehill.org) which is sponsored by IAVA, a non-profit and non-partisan organization dedicated to improving the lives of today’s veterans, as part of an advocacy team focused on veterans’ employment issues. In 2010, the unemployment rate for veterans was 11.6 percent, compared to the national average of 9.7 percent.
 The event discussed IAVA’s 2011 Policy Agenda, which addressed the most urgent challenges facing Iraq and Afghanistan veterans and their families. IAVA annually surveys 90,000 Member Veterans and drafted the priorities from the survey results as well as in coordination with partner Veterans Service Organizations and community-based nonprofits nationwide. As an Iraq war veteran, I feel fortunate to have participated in this great event to increase awareness with our nation’s leaders about the unemployment challenges facing Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. 
Times are tough for everyone, but veterans are more likely to be unemployed than Americans as a whole. Education and employment opportunities are essential for today’s veterans to be the next ‘Greatest Generation.’ Unfortunately veteran unemployment has been above the national average for a couple of years. If this trending in the unemployment rate continues, we will fall behind our peers and the leadership and management abilities gained by those who served our country won’t be maximized in order to take America out of our current financial crisis. – Ed Dennis , Military Relations Manager
Storm the Hill 2011 on YouTube: The Thunder Rolls

Instructor Blog: Why Does Writing Well Matter?

For some students, English courses can seem unrelated to the knowledge they need to be successful in their field. However, strong writing skills demonstrate that you are educated, professional, and pay attention to detail. Before I was in the education field, I was part of a team that was evaluating candidates for a position. There was one resume from a candidate that had great experience, but it also included a typo.  The individual was not offered the job. Imagine sending your resume to a potential employer with the employer’s name spelled incorrectly. What first impression would you be making? The truth is that grammar matters!
These are certainly minor errors and it may seem unfair to disqualify someone from an interview because of them. However, these are the details that can leave a negative impression before someone even has the change to meet you in person. Error-free communication, especially when applying for a job, is crucial.
With that in mind, let’s address some frequently asked grammar questions in writing by examining these commonplace errors:
Incorrect apostrophe usage
An apostrophe is used to show possession. For example: “Alex’s idea. “ The idea belongs to Alex so there is an apostrophe.
It is not used to show plural. For example, “Gladys has two interviews.” The word “interview” is plural and not possessive, so there is no apostrophe.
Inappropriate use of personal pronouns
The use of personal pronouns should be minimal in academic and professional writing. For example, phrases such as “I think” are usually unneeded, and can detract from the facts.  Using “you” should be done with caution.  Using phrases such as “you should” can appear condescending and should only be used when clearly appropriate. Personal pronouns also detract from a professional tone.
Lack of proofreading
Any document that has a typo, spaces missing between words, or misspellings shows that the writer did not take the time to proofread a document. Incorrect word choice is not always caught by spell-check. For example, the words “defiantly” and “definitely” are similar in spelling, but quite different in meaning. Any document with your name on it represents you and your company. In our digital world, these words can be around for a long time!
Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement
Antecedent doesn’t have to be part of your regular vocabulary, however, consider the following sentence:
A student should always cite their work.
In the above sentence, student is singular therefore their is not the appropriate pronoun as it is plural. The grammatically correct way to state the sentence would be either of the below sentences:
A student should always cite his or her work.
Students should always cite their work.
Learning how to write well by correcting these errors in your writing is a great start! Keep those English textbooks handy so you can always brush up on your writing. It may make the difference between a glance and an interview!
For more career resources, check out the career center at Bryant & Stratton College.

ONBOARDING: THE CRITICAL FIRST STEP TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

It hasn’t been all that long since the term onboarding appeared on the talent management horizon. After all, the original, traditional “onboarding” concept was pretty matter-of-fact, to be kind: “OK, here’s your cubicle, computer, desk, phone, ID badge and a map to the closest restroom. Good luck!”
For the past several years, as bringing new people into an organization has finally been recognized for its critical connection to engagement, onboarding has taken on a new definition. Simply, onboarding today is the strategic vehicle for fast-tracking new talent into – and through – the organizational labyrinth to a progressed state of engagement and, as a result, productivity.
In other words, if you do it right, onboarding means that a new employee can hit the ground running and start out on a very positive note.
From pre-screening through hiring and onboarding, welcoming a new employee to the team can be the start of a rewarding relationship. Or, it can be the beginning of a missed opportunity. For employers who have workforces in the 500-600 range, missed opportunities translate to expensive oversights.
Consider the fact that even with that new focus on onboarding, studies show that one third of all external hires are no longer with an organization after two years. That’s an especially unfortunate outcome for smaller businesses that need to be as focused as possible on business strategies – not worried about the expensive merry-go-round of bringing on new hires

Saving Time, Increasing Productivity and Improving Retention

There are solid strategies for delivering the ultimate new candidate experience from start to finish. There also are new approaches to creating a successful onboarding program based on the strategic objectives of any organization. Using those proven strategies, combined with today’s learning and talent management software systems, you can develop a clearer picture of what needs to be done to compete for and retain talent – today and in the future. It also provides the foundation needed to help new hires succeed in their personal career development and drive optimal business results.
Using technology to help in developing and executing a successful onboarding process can:
  • Bring more structure and consistency to an otherwise decentralized process
  • Enable blended learning opportunities, combining classroom training with e-learning and social learning
  • Facilitate targeted role-specific skills training for faster time-to-productivity
  • Allow new employees to connect with their new team, peers and perhaps even a mentor via an internal social network
In addition, leveraging a system will automate the process, saving valuable time in areas such as auto-registering new hires and notifying and reminding new hires of required steps.

Small Investment Delivers a Big Return

You may have noticed that employee engagement is receiving a lot of attention in mainstream and trade media. After all, an engaged workforce is a productive, happy workforce. Well, it should come as no surprise that onboarding is the catalyst, the place where engagement really begins when someone joins your company. The good news is that effective onboarding requires a relatively small investment to deliver a big return.
Below are some tips on developing an effective onboarding strategy:
  • Be sure to have a clear understanding of what competencies are required for success, and how those competencies link to business outcomes. 
  • Provide structured development support in the first few weeks.
  • Remember to support both managers and new hires throughout the process.
  • Establish a clear roadmap for success early in the onboarding process.
  • Do your best to have an understanding of what drives and motivates any new hire. Work out how you are going to increase his/her level of engagement.
In the end, successful onboarding requires micro-engagement based on what matters to the individual, more than anything. Also, the most successful companies don’t end their onboarding program after a week or two. To work, onboarding should span well into the early stages of employee development. In some leading companies, in fact, onboarding is a two-year process – a strong indicator of its importance.
Clearly, onboarding today must be a much deeper, more meaningful effort than just providing an easy route through new hire paperwork. If it doesn’t serve as a prime driver of employee engagement – getting the new hire jazzed up and productive from the get-go – then it’s time to rethink your process and move to onboarding that works.
For more onboarding best practices, check out the recording of the Cornerstone OnDemand webinar, \”Onboarding Success: Tools to Engineer Experience for Optimal Business Outcomes.\” 

Bryant & Stratton College Online Forms Student Veterans Group

Students create network to help online military students, veterans and their families find success in school and the workplace
BUFFALO, NY (May 31, 2011) – Bryant & Stratton College Online announced today the formation of Student Veterans of Bryant & Stratton College Online, a support network for students who have served in the U.S. military, are currently serving, their families and civilian supporters. The student-led group will focus on building upon available resources that make success in the classroom and workplace more attainable.
Military Solider saluting to flagThe group is being started by student and veteran Shay Leech, who served in the U.S. Navy. Leech saw the opportunity to start a peer-to-peer network that would provide resources, support and advocacy to her military classmates and their families. She is currently pursuing an Associate’s degree in Medical Reimbursement and Coding at Bryant & Stratton College Online.
 “Too often veterans who start college drop out because of a lack of support. While Bryant & Stratton College Online already provides resources to help military students and veterans continue with their education, I wanted to form a group so veterans and active duty students would have a community where we could support each other as well,” said Leech. “In my experience it is hard to be in college as a mother, but it is even harder to be a veteran, since it is difficult for others to relate to what you’ve been through unless they’ve gone through it too. Student Veterans of Bryant & Stratton College Online will provide that extra fellowship and understanding for students who know what it is like being active duty or veterans.”
The goal of Student Veterans of Bryant & Stratton College Online is to assist and guide military and veteran students through their education and career. The group’s meetings will focus on advocacy, social opportunities and recreational activities as a means of fostering camaraderie among the students. Student Veterans will also work with the college administration to meet the needs of current and prospective student veterans as well as increase community awareness of veterans’ experiences. Students interested in becoming members are encouraged to join the group on LinkedIn, which is where Student Veterans will be connecting online.
“We are committed to supporting our military and veteran students that have given so much for this country,” said Ed Dennis, Military Relations Manager at Bryant & Stratton College Online. “Student Veterans of Bryant & Stratton College Online will be a touchstone for these students, a support network they can count on to help them succeed.”
Once Student Veterans of Bryant & Stratton College Online is established, Leech plans to apply to make the group an official chapter of Student Veterans of America, a coalition of student veterans groups on college campuses across the United States. Bryant & Stratton College Online is proud to support the troops and their families. Last fall, G.I. Jobs Magazine named Bryant & Stratton College Online a 2011 Military Friendly School. As a member of the Service members Opportunities College (SOC) consortium*, Bryant & Stratton College is also an approved institution for the training of U.S. veterans and their family in accordance with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Bryant & Stratton College Online is CLEP, DANTES, ECE and other SOC Colleges approved. In April, Bryant & Stratton College Online launched www.SalutetoSpouses.com, a career and education information resource website for military spouses. SalutetoSpouses.com is the home of the college’s Salute to Spouses Scholarship, which awards $6,000 towards a Bryant & Stratton College Online degree to spouses of active duty military personnel. The expansion of the site builds on the success of the scholarship and increases the resources available to military spouses interested in earning their degree or building a sustainable career. 
The content on SalutetoSpouses.com, includes how to articles, tips, advice columns and personal accounts and is created and edited by military spouses. Bryant & Stratton College was founded in 1854 and is regionally accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. For more information about Bryant & Stratton College and its online degree programs, visit https://www.bryantstratton.edu/online-learning.
*The Bryant & Stratton College-Virginia Beach campus is also a SOCNAV and SOCAD consortium member. To view the full press release, click here.  

Life After Graduation: A Day in the Life of a Police Officer

When Desiree Shealy was a child, she watched police officers in action on TV. And she loved what she saw.
She said watched them catch the bad guys, help the old lady get her purse back and ticket the speeder who was endangering everyone around him.
“I always thought it was so neat,” she said. “I always enjoyed the way people looked up to an officer as a friend, helper and protector.”
It was who she wanted to be. Now, thanks to her associate’s degree in Criminal Justice from Bryant & Stratton College, it is who she is.
Desiree is a corporal with the Newberry, S.C. police department.
But, is being an officer everything she hoped it would be?
“Best job ever,” Desiree said.
On the job, her daily routine is anything but routine. There is no so-called typical day, she said. Instead, she is responds to calls that are varied in both need and level of danger.
Last week, while she was on duty, she responded to a scene where two men were shot, and one died, the possible result of gang-related activity. The next day, she responded to shots fired into an apartment.
Not every moment is action packed, however. Desiree said she begins her shift as the sun wakes at 5:45 a.m. and doesn’t return home until 6 p.m., at the earliest. There is paperwork to be completed and maintenance on her patrol car to be done. Desiree and her fellow officers also deliver meals to older or disabled people throughout the day and have to appear in court once a week to follow up on individuals who have been charged. She also ferries inmates from the jail to the courtroom and back to their cells.
And, her job can be tough. Desiree said it’s a difficult decision to decide when to go lightly and when to prosecute to the fullest extent. Not all crimes are cut and dry.
“People have some good stories and lies, so sometimes it’s hard to believe what is the most accurate version of the truth,” she said.
She said it is also hard to “work for a public that sometimes appears to be ungrateful and working for a department that often puts the budget before the employees.”
So what makes it the best job ever?
“The fact that no matter what you think of the police, we are the first people you call for help, and we always come. No matter how bad it is, we show up to help,” she said.
Desiree suggested that current criminal justice take their coursework seriously, even the topics that might seem, boring. She said classes in ethics, culture and law have all proven useful on a daily basis in her work.
“Do not take lightly what you learn in school. It will only help you when it is time to go through the criminal justice academy,” she said.
And, she said, never give up.
“It may take years to get hired or graduate from the criminal justice academy, but if you want it, someone will give you a chance.”

THE BIG FIVE STEPS FOR MID-SIZED ORGANIZATIONS TO ADVANCE THEIR TALENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Over the last 2-3 years, we’ve witnessed a real trend toward and acceptance of integrated talent management systems among most enterprise and many midsize organizations. However, over 25 percent of all organizations still have talent processes that are developed and managed individually, with practices and systems that are “siloed” and have little or no coordination across processes.
True talent management integration doesn’t happen all at once for a lot of companies. Instead, many organizations take a “layering it on” approach, selecting systems that support the evolution of their processes over time.

Challenges for Mid-Sized Organizations

Savvy leaders realize the importance of developing their internal bench strength today to competitively address the organizational demands of tomorrow.  But where do midsize companies start as they develop a talent management strategy to support growth and bench strength plans?
Identifying and adopting the ideal components needed to support an integrated performance and learning management process is complex and time-consuming. For midsize organizations with limited resources, it’s especially challenging.
Most HR practitioners get started by developing a performance management process based on so-called “proven best practices”, and then continue to layer on additional core performance and learning management processes one step at a time.
Of course, the very concept of a best practice is subjective and carries many meanings depending on an organization’s culture. What might be a best practice for one organization or industry may not be successful or acceptable in another

Cut Through the Haze with Five Core Components

In our recent whitepaper, we put forth the proposition that you should begin by focusing on the five core internal performance management components necessary to support key business priorities specifically for mid-sized organizations. These are:

1. Strategic Onboarding

The four building blocks of proactive and effective onboarding — compliance, clarification, culture and connection — should be thoughtfully organized and carefully implemented for a successful onboarding practice.

2. SMART Goals

Once the CEO and executive team have set the organization’s vision and the main financial, customer and organization-wide goals, each sub-unit creates associated team goals, which, in turn, contribute to the organization’s goals. This process “cascades” down the organization until it reaches front-line managers and their employees.  Aligning goals throughout the organization requires clarity and specificity as goals are cascaded organization-wide.

3. Employee Development

Performance assessment in isolation is not enough and it alone does not guarantee performance improvement. Having a performance management process without a learning and development component is like giving a student the motivation to study harder for a test but not giving them any study techniques or resources to help them succeed. Don’t leave training out of your talent management strategy.

4. Succession Planning

Planning the future for specific roles, specific people, or even general sets of critical skills is not for huge enterprise organizations only anymore. Without succession planning, organizations typically respond reactively to changes in leadership and are left to rely on external talent to fill critical internal roles. Worse yet, existing employees may be promoted to roles that are ill-fitted to their current skills or competencies.

5. Employee Engagement

With double-digit unemployment being the norm recently, employees are searching for ways to get ahead without getting out. Building internal résumés, openly expressing career preferences and being allowed to explore potential internal career paths are valuable strategies for employees who are itching to take active interest in managing their own mobility and development. Employees want to be engaged in their work for you – are you going to let them do so?

FIVE CONSIDERATIONS FOR TM BUYERS IN THE WAKE OF SAP/SFSF

Last week SAP announced its intent to acquire SuccessFactors for $3.4 billion – which just so happens to be the predicted size of the entire talent management market for 2011 (according to Gartner and Bersin & Associates). This news is important for almost as many reasons as there have been opinions published over Twitter and in blogs in the aftermath.
Technology vendors in the talent management space have witnessed a lot of consolidation lately. For starters, just about every top-tier Learning Management System (LMS) – other than Cornerstone – was acquired in the last two years, reflecting the realization by performance management vendors that training and development must be a part of the broader talent management spectrum.
But the SAP/SuccessFactors deal represents a different kind of market shift – less about basic consolidation and the fleshing out of vendor portfolios and more about market validation and an expansion of the conversation outside our immediate neighborhood.
So what’s Cornerstone’s take (another voice in the bedlam)? We think the merger of SAP and SuccessFactors is a significant moment with at least five key possible outcomes to consider if you are a potential buyer (or just an interested observer):

1. This is the beginning of talent management, not the end.

The acquisition of SuccessFactors is a serious validation of human capital management in general. Jason Averbook puts it more passionately: “SAP has just broadcast to the world the single-most persuasive validation of Human Capital Management technology to date. It is a declaration we can all, as vendors and practitioners, lean on as we create workforce technology strategies and HCM business cases for years to come.”
Beyond business processes, SAP’s self-declared push into the “Cloud” market is a major validation of Software-as-a-Service as a delivery model.
So the talent management market is alive and well. If anything, SAP’s acquisition feels a little bit like the old “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” from the perspective of the ERP players. And hopefully that realization ends up benefitting organizations by raising the profile of talent management process and technology.

2. Confusion and distraction will certainly be among the immediate consequences.

After a major industry event like this one, everyone immediately has one big question: how long will it take for the acquirer to integrate the acquired company? Integrating product sets and corporate cultures is never easy work, especially so in the case of a traditional software giant absorbing a fast-moving, cloud-based vendor.
One of the biggest challenges is likely to be the rationalization of the companies’ offerings. How do you make the merging products (and related services) work together? Which older, outdated products must be eliminated?  How do you make the user experience work between disparate products? How about data models and customer support programs and….on and on.
Naomi Bloom catalogs the product rationalization challenge in her recent blog post “SAP/SuccessFactors — Help Me Count the HRM Codebases”.
This is an ambitious assimilation of technologies and strategic approaches. Results may come, but there will certainly be a lot of growing pains along the way. And while SAP and SuccessFactors wrestle the eight-headed snake, other vendors will continue to innovate and serve their clients.

3. Innovation will continue to come from the best-of-breed talent management vendors.

While big ERP vendors like SAP certainly bring new attention to the talent management technology world, if history is any indicator, product innovation is not likely to be spurred by these combined companies in the foreseeable future.
Josh Bersin argues that this is precisely why the best-of-breed talent management vendors will continue to exist (and thrive) – “primarily because of the tremendous levels of innovation still yet to be achieved in talent management. New areas, like social recruiting, social performance management, social rewards, social learning, mobile talent management, talent analytics, talent risk management, employee engagement management, contingent workforce management and many others, continue to become more important to customers every day.”
Bersin goes further to note the worrying “upgrade interlock” problem that faces ERP/talent management customers. This means that, typically, every new release of an ERP vendor’s talent management offering is dependent on a new release of the HRMS.
On the other hand, organic talent management SaaS/cloud vendors are releasing new and improved functionality on a quarterly basis, in some cases. It comes down to a matter of being fast and nimble, accusations rarely leveled at lumbering ERPs.

4. HR technology should be owned by HR and not IT.

One of the other possible implications of an ERP vendor acquiring a talent management company is that it means that IT assumes control of HR technology. And we all know how well that works today.
For HR technology to realize its potential business benefits, it must be governed by HR itself. Relying on IT to source, implement and administer talent management software sounds like a recipe for limited business impact.

5. Organically developed talent management has never been more meaningful.

It won’t shock the reader to hear that Cornerstone OnDemand sees the SAP/SuccessFactors merger in the most positive of light. The merger validates the work of all the best-of-breed talent management SaaS/cloud vendors in the space for the past 10-15 years.
However, the considerable questions raised around integration and the role of the ERP as provider of talent management software leave a significant opportunity for the nimble, innovative, best-of-breed providers that remain in the market (and there aren’t many of us left).
With so much transformative possibility in the industry today – around social tools, mobile access, talent mobility, employee engagement, workforce planning, analytics, etc. – it seems like what we all need to focus on most is rapidly developing innovative products to match the ambitions of forward-thinking HR practitioners and good talent management processes.
Disruption often (always?) leads to opportunity. Tien Tzuo, founder and CEO of Zuora, reacted to the SAP/SuccessFactors news this way: “I’ve seen this movie before. When Siebel bought Upshot CRM in 2003, it instantly signaled to the world that SaaS CRM was the future, and catapulted Salesforce.com from ankle biter to the de facto industry leader.”
Tzou’s analogy has remarkable parallels today.

TALENT MANAGEMENT AND SUCCESSION PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION

America’s higher learning institutions educate and develop society’s future thinkers and leaders. It’s ironic, then, that it seems many don’t develop their own administrative staff or leadership talent.

Administrator Talent Crisis

Research shows talent and succession planning is lacking at America’s colleges and universities. The American Council on Education (ACE), for example, reports in a survey that the talent pipeline of potential administrative leaders in academia is getting short shrift, as ACE reports that less than a third of all sitting chief academic officers are aspiring to presidencies or chancellorships.
That’s not good, but it gets worse. Research also shows that many tenure-track faculty members also are deciding to stay in the classroom, reluctant to pursue new challenges as administrators.
Here are some startling statistics that fortify the notion that academia’s talent pipeline needs serious tending. For example:
  • Nationally, more than 40 percent of the top investment executives within universities and endowments left in 2005 and 2006, according to a 2007 compensation survey by Mercer
  • A national study of 323 chief academic officers, conducted by Eduventures Academic Leadership Learning Collaborative, found that 43 percent of provosts surveyed are holding their positions for shorter periods of time.
  • A 2009 study of chief academic officers by the ACE found that the average tenure was 4.7 years on the job — less than half that of presidents

Where to Go From Here

It’s a dicey situation, but not an impossible one to overcome. For starters, effective succession planning starts with performance management supported by learning and development programs. Follow that “curriculum” and universities soon will discover potential leaders from within the ranks. Of course, one thing you don’t want when filling critical administrative posts is guesswork.
For many universities, performance management is merely an annual HR process to appraise performance, as opposed to an effort to improve performance or identify future leaders. Saddled with homegrown, paper-based processes, institutions often use performance management tools and approaches that fail to take advantage of the automation, integration and depth of technology available today. Or institutions may have processes that don’t enable managers to have meaningful, actionable discussions with their direct reports.
The solution is more strategic talent and peformanance management processes, supported by the right technology that can better lead, manage, develop, reward and assess employees in a concise, standardized way.
To make succession planning a reality, university leaders need a performance management system that:
  • Provides cascading goals that align the objectives of the institution with the professional goals and needs of the employee. Managing and measuring the employee performance of each of these goals is critical to performance management, but without automation and integration, it becomes a time-consuming, daunting task.
  • Assesses critical competencies and skills based on pre-defined criteria for staff success. Institutional leaders need an easy-to-use system that helps them predict and address potential competency gaps, performance strengths and opportunities.
  • Reviews and measures performance on a ongoing and interim basis. The cascading goals an employee will be assessed by might not reflect the institution’s current goals and objectives. Automated and integrated systems make managing and assessing performance an ongoing process — always keeping the employee and the institution aligned.
  • Identifies and tracks high-performing individuals. Performance management enables institution leaders to know who is a high-potential employee with the skills and motivation to transition into a leadership or administrative staff position.
  • Enables the creation of development plans that engage employee career development. Identifying high-performing, high-potential employees is great, but even more important is creating career development plans for those employees.
Ultimately, institutional leaders have an opportunity to better gather insight into the skills, knowledge and competencies that succession-ready employees have at hand – and, further, to turn this insight into action and talent they should develop for the future. 

TALENT MANAGEMENT FOR HEALTHCARE

In the last few years, our old pals at Bersin & Associates argued that healthcare has lagged behind other industries in adoption and implementation of talent management automation and processes and that many healthcare organizations are working to make up for lost time. (Bersin & Associates 2009 Talent Management Factbook)
Any healthcare organization looking to jump-start a talent initiative should keep a few things front of mind:
  • Build with an eye toward integration – E-learning may be a natural starting point for healthcare organizations implementing new talent initiatives, but onboarding, performance management and succession initiatives all benefit from strong tie-ins to a learning management system (LMS). For example, performance assessments can automatically generate development plans for any area where deficiencies are identified. Don’t overlook targeted, formal development programs for employee supervisors. Extra training will prepare them to mentor and coach employees and maximize the value of your investment.
  • Automate job descriptions with a foundation of competencies – Establishing the competencies – the knowledge, skills and behaviors that are used to develop people in your healthcare organization – is a critical step for success of any talent management initiative. In the healthcare setting, it’s a requirement because compliance demands it. Maintaining one set of job descriptions and competencies is one way to integrate multiple locations common in large healthcare systems into a single culture and to build job profiles that will guide career development, training and performance improvement across your organization. You will also find it easier to deliver the ROI because the business impact of career planning is 45 percent higher for organizations with good or excellent leadership competencies. (Bersin & Associates,  Competency Management 2008)
  • Build internal talent pools – Every healthcare organization needs to fill positions in critical roles such as nursing, IT and senior management. Yet, suitable candidates are hard to find. Most healthcare employers understand that the only solution is to “grow their own” talent. Implementing appropriate talent management and learning tools and processes makes identification of high-potential employees and development of critical skills far easier to accomplish.
  • Collaborate to build a comprehensive succession strategy – Most healthcare organizations have a critical need to develop their next generation of leadership. The current senior leaders must understand the critical need to address this gap. HR can – and must – play a crucial role in facilitating this conversation, and technology can provide a key assist to identify the gaps and assign development plans for designated successors.
  • Leverage the power of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) – SaaS technology allows healthcare employers to rapidly implement talent solutions at a far lower cost and with greater operational efficiency than traditional legacy on-premises ERP implementations of the past. The advantages include rapid deployment and easy scalability, and a lower cost with higher satisfaction, as well as less time to ROI.
In the end, empowering your people is the essential first step toward addressing talent challenges and delivering safer, higher-quality patient care and satisfaction. Using talent management technology, employers can manage their staffing, training and performance operations with healthcare-specific functionality, including competency-based job descriptions, pre-integrated training and continuing-education content – all in a single, secure location.

THE CHOICE IS YOURS: ORACLE-TALEO ACQUISITION HIGHLIGHTS STARK CHOICES FACING HR BUYER

Few people who follow the HR software industry were surprised by last week’s announcement by Oracle that they intend to acquire recruiting and talent management vendor Taleo.  In the wake of December’s acquisition of SuccessFactors by SAP and the preceding two years of increasingly frantic market consolidation, the news was greeted with little surprise.
There’s not much point in rehashing the analysis of some very smart HR practitioners and industry analysts here. The discussion taking place on Bill Kutik’s HR Tech Conference LinkedIn group is clearly a fine place to review the reaction.
From Cornerstone’s perspective, naturally, we have clear ideas about what the Taleo and SuccessFactors acquisitions mean for buyers of talent management software and services.
First, we believe that these shifts signal the beginning of talent management – not the end. Talent management is now more important than ever after $5.5 billion has been spent on acquisitions of TM applications in last 3 months.
Further, and more critically, we would suggest that buyers are at a serious crossroads today, facing very significant choices around where talent management software is going in the coming years, who will control it and what it will look like.

At the Crossroads

With Taleo and SuccessFactors giving up on providing independent talent management technologies, Cornerstone is really the only choice left if you favor an independent, best-of-breed solution. Why does this matter?
Choice – ERP or Best-of-Breed:  Buyers looking for compelling answers to their vexing talent management problems have to choose between, on the one hand, an ERP vendor, offering a mixed bag of products (acquired, homegrown, SaaS, on-premise) with long innovation and upgrade cycles and, on the other hand, a best-of-breed provider focused completely on talent management, client success, business impact, and pure Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) delivery. The choice is yours.
Choice : – Integration vs. Innovation: Do you want your partner continuously improving your solution to provide state-of-the-art talent management or do you prefer to have your vendor tied up in a quagmire of product integrations?
The talent management product integration and rationalization challenges now facing Oracle and SAP are daunting. “Sorting out the myriad HCM-related code bases at both SAP/SFSF and Oracle/PSFT/Fusion/EBS/Taleo/Etc. is not for the feint of heart,” opines Naomi Bloom in the HR Tech Conference LinkedIn discussion group. It’s not just an overwhelming task to sort out these talent management products and codebases, but it’s also going to take a long time.
Further, if you are interested in learning and development (and you should be, just ask Josh Bersin – see his blog on the subject), consider that Learn.com (previously acquired by Taleo) and Plateau (previously acquired by SuccessFactors) clients have both been acquired twice in less than a year and are now buried under two layers of bureaucracy.
The choice is yours.
Choice – System of Record or System of Engagement:  Talent management should be about employee engagement and empowerment. ERP systems are about managing records and data. An independent, best-of-breed provider has the luxury of focusing innovation and the product roadmap on user centricity and helping clients to build an empowered workforce.  With all trends pointing to the need to engage a demographically shifting workforce, we believe buyers will prefer to side with a state-of-the-art, organically developed talent management solution rather than a bolted-on extension of a system of record. The choice is yours.
Choice – Who Owns This Thing? IT or HR?  In large enterprises, ERP systems are almost always controlled by the IT department. Often, the HR department and line of business owners struggle to get attention for their specific needs. Cloud-based technologies have enabled HR to control their destiny and closely align people, process and technology with business priorities. With formerly independent talent management software now becoming system-of-record dependent, customers will likely be locked into a single ERP stack where IT will regain sole control over technology decisions.  This might be an acceptable paradigm for some HR organizations, but it seems less likely to lead to successful talent management outcomes.  The choice is yours.
Back in December, we posted some thoughts about what the SAP-Success Factors merger meant for clients and potential buyers of talent management software. The issues at hand today are much the same and focus on the ability of the independent, best-of-breed vendor to deliver things like a better product, better client experience, more innovation, and faster response to client feedback. Compared to the challenges and confusion facing the ERP vendors and their recent absorption of talent management companies, the choices seem quite stark.
If you want to read more, we found these resources to be noteworthy:
♦ With Oracle’s $1.9 Billion Deal to Buy Taleo, Is Cornerstone Next?   (Bloomberg / Peter Burrows)
Walravens thinks Cornerstone will perform well as an independent company, and that its growth rates are “tremendous.”… Being the last independent talent management provider could goose Cornerstone’s sales. While loyal SAP shops will gladly use SuccessFactors and Oracle shops will gravitate to Taleo, Cornerstone is positioned to grab those that don’t want to buy into these giants’ soup-to-nuts offerings.
♦ Cornerstone Gears Up for Bigger Foes in Talent Management   (Wall Street Journal / Steven D. Jones)
Nomura analyst Rick Sherlund said he liked the \”elegance of the product architecture\” from Cornerstone and its ease of use. In addition, he said, Cornerstone may benefit from merger confusion at both SuccessFactors and Taleo and difficulty integrating those products into the inventory of products at SAP and Oracle.
♦ Cloud Software Consolidation – Is it all good?   (ZDNet / Brian Sommer)
I also get concerned when a progressive, modern vendor is snapped up by slow moving behemoths that excel in running end-of-life product lines…Vendors will create incredible works of fiction to explain how they will rationalize these products into their product lines. Let’s face it, if the software solution your organization is using is acquired by a firm that already has three, four or five different acquired product lines of similar functionality, don’t you think it’s going to take either the suspension of disbelief or an amazing technical writer to create a story that shows how all of these diverse products from very different creators, across different time lines and technical platforms will somehow come together in some single rational scheme?
♦ News Analysis: The Implications of Oracle\’s Acquisition of Taleo   (Forbes / Ray Wang)
These defensive plays indicate a realization that Cloud delivery emerges as the predominant option for applications.
♦ Roll up, roll up! Oracle digests Taleo (ZDNet / Oliver Marks)
Cornerstone are true multi tenant in their architecture, and some of their appeal to customers and prospects is sure to be the SaaS advantages of pushing out updates painlessly, as opposed to endless patch Tuesdays and upgrades many in the marketplace have past war wounds from. 

EMPLOYERS NEED TO STEP UP TO CLOSE THE “SKILLS GAP”

Findings from a new Cornerstone OnDemand survey show that employers too often drop the ball when it comes to recognizing real source of perceived skills shortages.
Many of us have recently endured a bruising U.S. presidential electoral cycle centered squarely on economic and labor market issues and chock full of speechmaking focused on the need to create new jobs at any cost. We also hear a message of doom and gloom from loads of CEOs who echo a lingering message that they simply can\’t find enough skilled workers.
We do need jobs, of course – too many people are struggling with unemployment. And we need skilled people at every strata of the labor market. But a recent Cornerstone OnDemand survey shows that a single-minded focus on new job creation deflects attention from another critical area for improvement – focusing on the skills and engagement of existing internal employees. Further, the survey highlights that employers can no longer deny that they are partially to blame for the skills shortage.

A Skills Shortage?

The idea that there is a so-called “skills gap” is a contested one. CEOs often use it to explain the challenges they face in meeting their objectives and growing their businesses. It’s a pervasive belief one that seems to be growing – only 42% of employers believe new graduates in the workforce are adequately prepared by their colleges or other pre-employment training programs, according to a recent McKinsey study.
However, data from the recent Cornerstone survey, along with the loud voices of people like Peter Cappelli and Paul Krugman, bring the idea of a skills shortage into question. Cappelli argues that the perception of a shortage of skilled workers in the U.S. is mere illusion. It’s not the fault of the national education system, but instead of employers and their hiring practices and failure to invest properly in employee skills and alignment.

With Bosses Like These, Who Needs Enemies?

The bottom line is that employers are not making the right investments in building skills and nurturing employee performance.
Modern business seems to rely on a “plug-and-play” type of labor market, dependent on the immediate availability of deep pools of skilled labor. This stands in stark contrast to how employment functioned a few decades ago, where fresh faces could join a new company and feel content in the knowledge that they would be trained to be successful in their new jobs.
Cappelli has documented a decline in employer commitment to training, workforce development and apprenticeship programs over the past two decades, a finding that is reflected strongly in the most recent Cornerstone survey:
  • Only 32% of respondents have received training and development to better perform their job in the past six months;
  • Only 25% have established career goals with their manager/employer;
  • A full 66% said they haven’t received useful feedback from their manager/employer; and
  • Only 19% said their employer’s performance review process helps them increase their potential through education and training.

Narrow the Gap at Home

External job creation is undoubtedly critical for the healthy function of the economy as a whole. In the meantime, employers should beware of blaming performance shortcomings on a perceived (and often wage-based) skills shortage, when, in fact, they are doing precious little to develop and engage their current internal employees.
The goal should be to invest in narrowing the skills gap at home – to meet looming business challenges by better mobilizing the existing talent base. Not every one of our challenges will be met through net new hiring.
For more insight and detailed findings from the latest Cornerstone OnDemand survey, go to http://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/resources/research/survey-2013.

GAZING INTO THE CRYSTAL BALL: CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLES A CRACK PANEL TO DISCUSS THE FUTURE OF WORK

Cornerstone OnDemand recently hosted a lively panel discussion on “Predicting the Future of Work” with three of the brightest minds in the business. End of year is a natural time to think about the future, of course, and we look forward to reading some interesting prognostication on 2013 in the next couple of weeks (for starters, try this piece by IDC’s Lisa Rowan).
The Cornerstone webinar featured Josh Bersin (Bersin & Associates), Yvette Cameron (Constellation Research) and Elaine Orler (Talent Function). Moderated by our very own sage soothsayer Jason Corsello, the panel tackled a range of questions centered on the theme of what to expect in the world of work as we move into 2013.  This included conversations around:
  • The current state of learning and training in organizations;
  • The state of recruiting and the perceived “skills gap” in hiring decision-making; and
  • The role of technology in the workplace and how we work.

Is the Future Already Here? Broad Themes for 2013

The panelists started off with some broad thoughts about the future of work and trends that are impacting HR practitioners today and into the new year. 
Josh Bersin noted that, increasing specialization of jobs (due largely to globalization and advances in technology) means we are seeing flatter/cross-functional teams and that the individual employee’s value today is driven more by skills than the definition of the job role. Josh also noted the increasing impact of diversity in the workplace – not just ethnic, but also generational and age diversity alongside different employee backgrounds and experiences. And it’s more than just a casual observation: Bersin & Associates research shows that diverse teams actually work better.
Yvette Cameron focused her 2013 themes on a single word: MORE. She believes that the future of work is already here and that in 2013 we should expect more, more, more of what’s already going on (especially around the impacts of technology in the workplace and Big Data). On the data point, Yvette went further to remind us that we are doubling the amount of data out there every two years. The ability of organizations to use this data for meaningful impact is both a challenge and an opportunity for decision-makers in the coming year.
Elaine Orler is an expert on recruiting, and she focused her 2013 themes on the challenges facing businesses in terms of not only attracting and hiring Millennials, but also in re-recruiting Baby Boomers. Elaine also noted the change in so-called resume currency: “The concept of a paper resume is gone. The concept of an online profile / upload your resume is moving away.” In its place, we should expect performance-based and assessment-driven applicant profiles.

Learning & Development: You Can’t Hire Your Way Out of This One

Josh started off the discussion of employee development by reminding us that training actually works.  Simply put, the sophistication of an organization’s training initiatives is seen by Bersin & Associates as a huge differentiator between high-performing and low-performing companies. Further, organizations that do systematic development planning generate twice the revenue per employee, due principally to the continuous skills development focus that accompanies development planning.
Josh also noted that, according to recent Bersin research, the entire corporate learning and development market grew by 12% in 2012 (despite the recession). This is due to the fact that “companies have basically realized that they cannot hire themselves out of these problems, they have to train their people out of these skills gaps.”

The Shifting Nature of Employee Learning

The conversation perked up when the panel got into less formal streams of learning and development. That’s not surprising, considering that there does seem to be a lot more uncertainty about how informal, social and video-based learning should play out in the workplace.
Yvette discussed the fact that learning can (and should) play out in all forms and modalities – not just from the typical “training department” and the CLO. Mentors count in this respect, and so do peers. All manner of informal learning that can happen here, there and everywhere.
Video-based learning through ubiquitous, consumer-side technologies like YouTube came up. Josh argued that, while YouTube can certainly be a good training tool, he fears that trainers too often don’t know how to properly use it, and training departments too often have limited resources, technical architecture and internal support.

Filling Talent Gaps

Jason Corsello shifted the conversation to the recruiting problem – that is, why do we always hear that there are too many applicants for too many jobs, but we still struggle to find the right skills.  Elaine tackled this one and suggested that five years ago, a company might have 100 positions to fill, and they had the luxury to be creative in filling the positions.  Today, that same company might have only five jobs to fill, and there’s severely limited creativity in how to fill them.
She went further to argue that recruiting today is often about filling specific talent gaps. Companies are no longer looking for more general sets of attributes: for example, the team player that has long-term growth ability and who can be taught a specific craft or skill.
This discussion dovetails nicely into the results of the recent Cornerstone OnDemand survey, which highlighted, among other things, the lack of investment by employers in the area of filling skill gaps internally through better employee development, alignment and engagement. Learn more here.

How Does Technology Fit Into This Picture (and What Is SnapChat)?

Yvette kicked off a conversation of how technology will play a role in the workplace of 2013 by noting that we’ve already moved from systems of transaction to “systems of engagement” – accessible technology that fosters collaboration, just-in-time learning and daily engagement with work. These types of systems are essential in an age with the line between work and life has been considerably blurred.
When it comes to figuring out what interesting technology is around the corner, don’t even get our panel started about SnapChat. Elaine discussed the emergence of new tools for social collaboration: “The concept that video takes over the voice conversation, the concept that a picture says a thousand words…I think these are the kinds of tools that teens today and the next generation is going to look to have in the workforce.”
The panel got going on a few other related topics as well, all revolving around the core theme of what we can expect to see in the world of work in 2013.  For the full replay of the event, please click here.
And many thanks to Josh, Yvette, Elaine and Jason.