The Nation is celebrating 74th Independence Day today. Prime Minister Narendra Modi hoisted the national flag at the ramparts of the historic Red Fort in Delhi and addressed the nation this morning. Mr Modi was received by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh at the Red Fort. The Prime Minister then inspected the Guard of Honour.
 
The Guard of Honour contingent for the Prime Minister consisted of one officer and 24 men each from the Army, Navy, Air Force and Delhi Police. This year, the Guard of Honour was commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Gaurav S Yewalkar.
 
Before coming to Red Fort, the Prime Minister paid homage to Father of the Nation Mahatma Gandhi at Rajghat.

A justified wage refers to an income level determined by market dynamics, work experience, education and skill. A justified wage is the wage level that is high enough to attract workers but low enough to enable employers to offer employment. The divergence between a justified wage and the legal minimum wage may depend on several factors including the state of the economy and level of unemployment.

• A justified wage is a fair level of compensation paid to an employee that takes into account both market and non-market factors.
• It is a wage that is often greater than the minimum wage, but which also allows employers to actively seek out and hire workers.
• The type of work, the skills demanded, experience, job duties, and the general state of the economy all come into play when establishing a justified wages.

Understanding a justified wage

A justified wage combines economic factors of supply and demand in the workforce with more social and culturally relevant inputs like work experience, education and skills training, and type of job. A wage is justified when it is seen as socially acceptable while at the same time economically feasible for both workers and employers.

In a recession, the actual level of wages for this worker may drop to just above minimum wage due to the high level of unemployment and a stagnant economy. After the Great Recession, many investment banks justified lower wages due to slow economic growth. To learn more about investment banker wages, see: what drives investment banker salaries.

Justified wages for employees :

Companies may compare their employees’ salaries and work experience when determining a justified wage. For example, Meagan, a current employee, has 10 years’ experience and receives a salary of $65,000. Based on this information, management determines that Paul’s justified wage is $60,000 given that he has eight years’ experience. Management may also consider other factors when establishing a justified wage, such as what responsibilities the employee has and the revenue they generate. For instance, the amount of commission a stockbroker writes could justify his or her wage. Employees can help determine their justified wage during pay reviews by discussing how they add value to the company.

Justified wages for CEOs

When determining a justified wage for a CEO, the board of directors of a company typically considers:

• Leadership: What leadership skills does the CEO have? Does he or she have the ability to unite the senior management team and lead by example during times of transition? A CEO’s justified wage might be based on his or her ability to motivate employees.
• Strategic Ability: Does the CEO allocate resources effectively? Do they enter markets that enable the organization to grow and attract new customers? For example, the board of a multinational company may determine the justified wage of a CEO by his or her proven record of successfully entering foreign markets.
• Network: A CEO’s justified wage might be dependent on how effectively he or she can utilize connections. For instance, do they have the ability to lure senior executives from competitors? A CEO may have a higher justified wage if they have contacts that allow them to secure new suppliers and customers.

Fortune is a global media organisation situated in the USA. It publishes news relating to the business world in its magazine Fortune. Annually it also puts out a list of top 500 companies of the world which ranks them according to their revenue. This list is the Fortune Global 500. The more the revenue of a company the higher is its rank in the list.

This year the list is stopped by Walmart with revenue of $523,964 billion, followed by Sinopac  Group at number 2 with $407,009 billion revenue and State Grid at number 3 with $383,906 billion revenue. However the company which made maximum profit is Saudi Aramco whose profit is $86,270 billion.

There are many Indian companies in this list as well. Reliance industries Limited (RIL) is at number 96 which is the highest position ever earned by an Indian company. RIL has risen 10 ranks as compared to last year. Its revenue is $86,270 billion and profit $5,624.9 billion. In 2012 also RIL was in the top hundred at 99th position. It is interesting to note that RIL has been in the Fortune Global 500 list for the past 17 years.

The other Indian companies in this list Indian Oil Corp at 151, Oil and Natural Gas Corp (ONGC) at 190, State Bank of India (SBI) at 221, Bharat Petroleum Corp Limited at 309, Tata Motors at 337 and Rajesh Exports at 462.

The Global 500 list has companies from across 32 countries. This year the combined revenue of all companies amounted to $33.3 trillion and profit of $2.1 trillion. All the 500 companies in this list have accumulated 7 crore employees currently.

India is one of the fastest growing major economy in the world. Stealing the title of the slowing economy of China, this country has had an amazing journey to get to where it is today and with the right management it is very likely to become one of the world’s most powerful economy very soon. Not quite there yet. The total economy is still smaller in GDP terms than the economy of California. Over half of the native populations, nor works in agriculture and poverty is still very prevalent problem. Only open upload and throughout the past three decades it has seen unbelievable level of growth that has, among other things, hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. Completely understand how this country is going to get going. You must first understand where it has come from.

After over a century of servitude to the British under colonial rule and many, many decades of assertive efforts, India claimed its independence in August of 1947. This often sore a sharp downturn in economic prosperity because while colonists were oppressive, an undeniably exploitative called their host nations, they did ensure that they were able to effectively extract every bit of economic value they could from their colonies, India. It had lunch well from past lessons and actually ran a pretty effective economy once they were free from colonial rule. India developed a very protectionist economy. Protectionism is the policy of a nation to favour the goods produced by the nation over those produced abroad. Now all nations, to some extent will have a level of protectionism. This can be seen in things like tariffs charged on the important role materials or import quotas, limiting the amount of foreign cars that can enter a country that, given you the severity and extent of these policies, will determine how protectionist an economy is. A small side note is that this issue of protectionism has been in the news a lot recently with the US and Chinese trade war. This is ultimately a back and forth of protectionist policies that will work to favor the products of their respective local countries rather than the imports from abroad by artificially raising the prices of foreign goods. With these import taxes, countries will do this for many reasons. Primarily, it will be to protect their local industries and jobs from cheaper foreign competitors with lower wages. Sometimes it will just be political chess feeding. And sometimes it’s just another geopolitical negotiating strategy. In India’s case, though, it had a very different reason to adopt this protectionist policy. India had experienced first hand what colonialism and early global trade had meant for the countries on the bottom of the industrial ladder, it decided that instead of potentially subjecting another nation to the same kind of hardship did experience it would rather just do everything itself. The way to achieve this was through a series of five year plans which to regular channel viewers or savvy students of history sounds like the type of economic planning associated with a certain type of economic system. To top this off, India effectively nationalized most of its major industries in the mid 1950s and onwards, and its biggest trading partner at the time of the Soviet Union, and it had typical Soviet Esque style laws around pretty much everything called the license Raj, which was pretty much just a big book of bureaucratic red tape for anybody that wanted to do anything in the economy. So India was a communist country. Well no, it had a lot of central planning characteristics of the communist nation. I did trade with Communist Nations, but it really wasn’t a communist nation itself. India still supported free trade outside of its core industries of the nation. If you want to open a restaurant and turn a profit, you could. If you want to work your way up the corporate ladder, you could. So long as you are here to licensing Raj, which was easier said than done, you were in business. So it kind of was just a weird mix of both the worst of communism and the worst of capitalism. Be honest, India in the early years of the Cold War tried really, really hard to stay neutral. Eventually, though, it did actually lean more towards the Soviet Union and 1971 India and Soviet Union signed the windows Soviet Treaty of friendship and cooperation, which was just a very public way of saying that they would keep on trading in cooperating as they had been for the decades beforehand. This was all well and good, but the country really didn’t do that much economically. It grew in line with similar communist economies in the region and remain primarily agricultural with aside emphasis. On government run heavy industry, but this was all about the change. 

Up until the 90s, the Soviet Union was India’s major trading partner. But then in 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed and with it India lost a majority of its trade and a large portion of its industrial support. 1991 was the slowest growth in the country had experienced since its independence. This was paired with a spike in oil prices that the growing economy relies so heavily on. All of this culminated in India facing the very real possibility of defaulting on its heavy debt burden. It found itself in in a last ditch effort to avoid the fates of economies in similar positions. At this time,Indian government reached out to the International Monetary Fund for a 1.8 billion dollar bailout loan. The International Monetary Fund is an international organisation that consists of 189 member country. And try to basically act as an intermediary to get everybody to do business with one another. It raises money by basically charging membership fees, two member states that will then use that money to lift up struggling economies like India in 1991. The International Monetary Fund is worth it for member states like the USA for example because it promotes global trade, monetary cooperation and sustainable economic growth. All things that are really important for a world power like the US. India, on the other hand, had up until this point shunned international trade, grasping onto their protectionist policies and state run enterprises. The International Monetary Fund agreed to loan India that money it so desperately needed. If India agreed to deregulate and open up its economy.

Since the agreement with the International Monetary Fund India has gone through a bold period of embracing free enterprise, it’s once government run industries have been prioritized. It’s very very strict. Trade policies have been relaxed, the country has opened itself up to business from around the world and the extremely limiting Licence Raj. That book of bureaucratic red tape that had rules about everything has since been thrown in the wood chipper. This was followed by an explosion in growth. India, the country has effectively doubled in size every five years since its turn around in 1991, which for a major economy is a growth rate that has only ever really been rivaled by nations like China and Japan, which is today the second and third largest economies in the world, respectively. These economic miracles are becoming more and more common around the world, though it has impacted large nations like the ones mentioned earlier. But many, many Eastern European and South East Asian countries seem to be going through these. Matthew industrial revolutions all together in a very short space of time.

Revolution took place in England and started around 1760. The process took many decades and the nation wasn’t really a fully industrialised nation until the mid 1800s. The technology of steam and water power eventually overflowed into other European economies that slowly started to go through their own industrial revolutions, changing from primarily agricultural nations to industrialise nations. These early European revolutions to many, many decades to fully get to the point where they could be considered an industrialised nation though. But recently this process has become a lot faster. China went from a primarily agricultural nation to primarily industrial nation and then onto a primarily server space nation. All in the span of about 20 years. Thailand did the same in around 5 years. The process of industrialization is getting faster and faster for every economy that goes through the transition. And here is why. Back in the 1760s when the first steam powered textile factories were spring into existence, these factories literally had to reinvent the wheel. The best layout for a factory floral. Best ways. Design everything from box to assembly lines was a little bit of unknown. This inevitably slowed down the whole process just a little bit. In today’s world we already have the knowledge and how all this industrial business should be done. So nations making the transition from agriculture to industry don’t have to reinvent the wheel. Oftentimes they can just buy machinery directly off established nations to carry out their business effectively from the get go. And this brings us neatly onto the second point. But world is now a large, interconnected global economy, with large businesses looking for new opportunities. As soon as a nation shows promising industrialising itself. International support tends to flock to these new nations in the form of multinational investment. Normally this takes the form of investment into industries can take advantage of cheaper Labour of developing countries, which one could argue four or against, but it does mean though is that these nations get the investment they need to hit the ground running as an industrialised nation. India is already a very very large economy simply by virtue of its resources at the main population. An favourable environmental conditions. The nation is already the 5th largest country in the world. As of late 2019 and it has achieved this ranking while still having a majority of its population. Working in agriculture. But this is all changing uncertainty and the rising cost of doing business in China is making the global business community look for a new base of its industrial operations for low cost manufacturing, India is the ideal according to take the reins right number of reasons and these same reasons are like India is likely behind the biggest and most rapid economic boom yet. India is a former British colony and while the country is much better off now as a free and independent state, it did take some of the best bits Britain had with it, namely its laws and its language. Language is actually normally seen as a pretty big hindrance to the economy because of the vast array of dialect spoken within the country that makes internal business. It’ll be difficult, but it does have going for it though is the second largest English speaking population in the world, falling only behind the USA?

English is the language of international trade and business population being able to speak English is a huge plus for when India bully sticks out onto the ball today. For reference, in China, less than 80% of the population speak English, which does create frictions in international business and could potentially just making the easier option in the future. Already India has benefited from this finding the world home of service call centres, the stereotypical Indian call centre is kind of thing that we make fun events. But to the Indian economy it means relatively good paying jobs that can be done by people of any age and industry. It is worth 10s of billions of dollars. This is just one small example of an industry that India has been able to monopolise that other industrialising nations would not have had the opportunity to be cause of their language barrier. The other big consideration is the Indian legal system. India does have its own system of government, although it is a system that basically reflects a western democracy. India has a president as the head of state and upper and lower House of governments to pass laws and a ranked court system. This again doesn’t sound like a huge deal but to international businesses shopping around for a new base of operations. This is huge to companies having a legal system similar to the western home countries, where trade dispute will be settled fairly. Business contracts will be honoured and intellectual property laws will be enforced is a very, very big deal and it is not something that multinationals have confidence in with countries like China. Now it must be noted that Indian law is not all roses and sunshine, it does have its problems with corruption but corruption tends to be something that international corporations can deal with as long as all that other stuff stays intact to protect them.

But what this all means is that India is likely on the cusp of an unbelievable technique that it is in the same position that I was 15 years ago. But it has a few big things going for it that China did not. If India is able to capitalise on the. And business attractiveness of the country. It is likely that the countries economy will continue to double in size many times over. This does not only mean that India will soon give China USA a run for their money, but on a smaller scale it will also mean that living conditions for hundreds of millions will be dragged up along with this economic explosion.

Why do we chose to buy or to wear the clothes we have? Is the intention to be attractive? Revealing? Modest? I always wonder why a lady would like to appear to be sexy. I what is her intention? It applies for men too……. I believe that what we wear is a true refection of the heart. When you go shopping, you only buy what you like, and when you wear it, you advertise the fact. So you show off your personality and reveal your character to those who see you. Does it make sense!?

The choice of your clothing speaks louder than the talk. The motives of one’s charecter are always judged by what they wear. People will always judge you by the looks. If you present yourself in cheap clothing, the thing that will be remembered is this and not your goodness or character.

Though we have the freedom to dress anyway we please, I do believe that our clothes reflect our character and hence we should be careful.

But if we think from another perspective, we miss out on many opportunities by judging by appearance only. This happens a lot of times. Dressing varies from land to land do judging personality based on dressing would be inappropriate. True Charecter I’d reflected is how we behave and not in how we dress.

In my opinion, in the case of a few, we can judge them by their looks while in some other cases, we cannot do like that. To be sure, dressing is your choice. Wear what you like, but only decent ones.

A power outage (also called a power cut, a power out, a power blackout,  power failureor a blackout) is the loss of the electrical power network supply to an end user.

There are many causes of power failures in an electricity network. Examples of these causes include faults at power stations, damage to electric transmission lines, substations or other parts of the distribution system, a short circuit, cascading failure, fuse or circuit breakeroperation.

Power failures are particularly critical at sites where the environment and public safety are at risk. Institutions such as hospitals, sewage treatment plants, and mines will usually have backup power sources such as standby generators, which will automatically start up when electrical power is lost. Other critical systems, such as telecommunication, are also required to have emergency power. The battery room of a telephone exchange usually has arrays of lead–acid batteries for backup and also a socket for connecting a generator during extended periods of outage.

I WAS DRINKING COFFE IN THE MORNING WHILE GOING THROUGH THE NEWSPAPER WITH A PLEASANT WEATHER AROUND. BUT , THE NEWS INSIDE IT WAS NOT AT ALL PLEASANT , WE ARE WELL AWARE OF THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN ,WE ARE FACING. THE SCHOLARS HAVE ALEARDY PREDICTED , IT’S GONNA BE WORSE FOR THE WHOLE WORLD ESPECIALLY FOR INDIA ; AS SHE IS GOING TO FACE THE WORST OF WORST SCENARIOS , GDP IS GOING TO BE AT THE LOWEST , MORE THAN THE YEAR 1947. IT WAS WRITTEN IN THE HEADLINE ‘ INFLATION ACCELARATES TO 6.93% DIMMING CHANCES OF A RATE CUT ‘ , WE HAVE WITNESSED THE VARIATIONS IN THE INFLATION THIS YEAR , HOW IT HAS BECOME AN ICEBERG IN OUR PATH ! . THE INTREST RATES CAN’T BE FURTHER REDUCED AS SAID BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA , THERE IS A LIMMIT TO CUT THE INTRESTS RATES , WE CAN’T MOVE BEYOND THAT LINE.

INDIA ‘s RETAIL INFLATION HAS SHOOT TO THE HUGE PERCENTAGE OF 6.93% , WHICH IS MAJIORILY DUE TO THE RISE IN THE PRICES OF FOOD , WHICH IS TERMED AS FOOD INFLATION . THIS MONSTER HAS GONE BEYOND THE MEDIUM TARGET OF RESERVE BANK OF INDIA FOR THE TENTH MONTH , UPSETTING IT IS . THE FIGURE IN THE JULY WAS 6.15% , BUT , IT IS BEING SAID THAT IT IS HIGHER , ACORDING TO THE FORECASTS IN THE REUTERS POLL OF ANALYSTS . IT WAS RECORDED 6.23% IN THE MONTH OF JUNE . THE FOOD PRICES HAVE CLIMBED UP , DUE TO SUPPLY SIDE DISRUPTIONS. A HIGH JUMP OF 9.62% COMPARED TO THAT OF 8.72% IN JUNE . RESERVE BANK OF INDIA LAST WEEK ANNOUNCED FEW CHANGES IN THE POLICY , UNCHANGING THE INTREST RATES AND CUT DOWN THE REPO RATE BY 115 BASIS POINTS . THE MEDIUM TERM SET BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA FOR INFLATION IS 4% ABOUT WHICH I MENTIONED ABOVE.

INDIA HAS EXPECTATIONS ABOUT THE CONTRACTION OF THE ECONOMY MORE THEN 4.5% IN THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR . CORE INFLATION HAS BEEN IN BETWEEN 5.8% AND 5.9%. BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS WE ARE EXPIRIENCING BEAUTIFULL MONSOON THEESE DAYS AND DUE TO THE MONSOON RAINS , AWAITING THE AVERAGE OF 104% FOR LONG TERM IN THE MONTHS OF AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. THIS IS A SIGN DESIGNATING THE HEAVY AND RICH HARVESTS , ADDING TO OVERCOME THE DAMAGES INCURRED DUE TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC.

I FEAR FOR THE BALLOON HEADING FOR A BURST !

A key session of the Rajasthan Assembly began today. The motion for vote of confidence was presented in the Legislative Assembly on behalf of the State Government, which is being debated in the house. Legislative Affairs Minister Shanti Dhariwal introduced the motion for vote of confidence in the house.
 
Starting the debate, Mr Dhariwal said that today the issue has attracted attention of people of entire state and the country. Speaker Dr C. P. Joshi said that the discussion would be concluded within three hours. It is believed that voting will be take place on the confidence motion by this evening.
 
The house assembled at 11 a.m. and paid tributes to Lalji Tondon, Ajit Jogi and other leaders who recently passed away. After the obituary remarks, the Speaker adjourned the house till 1 P.M. Special seating arrangements were made in the house to maintain social distancing in view of the Corona pandemic.