The Crucial Role of Whistleblowers in Corporate Governance

By

JYOTI

NIRMIT REDDY

AMITY UNIVERSITY NOIDA

Abstract: Corporate governance is the cornerstone of ethical and transparent business practices, ensuring accountability, fairness, and the protection of stakeholders’ interests. Within this framework, whistleblowers play an important role in uncovering and addressing corporate wrongdoing. This paper examines the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance. It discusses the importance of whistleblowers, the challenges they face & also provides recommendations for how to encourage more whistleblowers to come forward and how to protect them from retaliation.

This paper also examines legal protections and corporate policies aimed at safeguarding whistleblowers, highlighting the need for stronger legal frameworks to encourage reporting.

Key words: Whistleblowers, Corporate governance, legal protections, retaliation.

                                                 INTRODUCTION 

Whistleblowers are individuals who report wrongdoing or illegal activity to an appropriate authority. They play an important role in corporate governance by helping to ensure that companies are operating in a transparent and ethical manner.
Whistleblowers can come from any level of an organization, and they can report a variety of concerns, including financial fraud, employee abuse, environmental violations, and product safety issues. When whistleblowers come forward, they often face retaliation from their employers, including being fired, demoted, or harassed. However, the law protects whistleblowers from retaliation, and they can receive financial rewards for their disclosures.
The role of whistleblowers in corporate governance has been growing in importance in recent years. As companies have become more complex and globalized, it has become more difficult for regulators to keep track of all of their activities. Whistleblowers can provide regulators with valuable information that they would not otherwise have access to.In addition, whistleblowers can help to deter corporate wrongdoing. When employees know that there are people who are willing to report illegal activity, they are less likely to engage in such activity in the first place.

The importance of whistleblowers in corporate governance is clear. They play a vital role in ensuring that companies are operating in a transparent and ethical manner. By reporting wrongdoing, whistleblowers help to protect the public interest and make our society a more just and fair place.

                            OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH 

The objective of this research paper is to examine the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance. The paper will explore the following topics:

1) The definition of whistleblowers and the history of whistleblower laws.
2) The role of whistleblowers in preventing and detecting corporate fraud.
3)The challenges faced by whistleblowers.
4)The benefits of whistleblowers to society.

The paper will conclude with a discussion of the future of whistleblower laws and the role that whistleblowers can play in creating a more transparent and ethical corporate culture.
METHODOLOGY
This research paper seeks to explore the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance, employing a range of methodologies for a comprehensive understanding. The initial step involves an extensive literature review to grasp the current knowledge on the subject. Subsequently, a case study approach will be used to delve deeply into the impact of whistleblowers on corporate governance, providing detailed insights while building upon existing research.

The research paper will be written in a clear and concise style that is accessible to a general audience. Through this multifaceted approach, we aim to contribute significantly to the understanding of whistleblowers’ crucial role in corporate governance.

                                       LITERATURE REVIEW 

The role of whistleblowers in corporate governance is a subject of increasing importance and scrutiny in contemporary business ethics and regulatory landscapes. This literature review provides a comprehensive overview of key themes and findings in this field.
• Whistleblowers, individuals within organizations who expose misconduct or wrongdoing, are recognized as vital guardians of corporate integrity and accountability. Research has delved into various aspects of their role, motivations, and impacts on corporate governance.
• Motivations for whistleblowing have been a central focus. Studies reveal a complex interplay of ethical considerations, personal values, and concerns for public welfare. Whistleblowers often face dilemmas, balancing their commitment to ethical behavior with fears of retaliation and damage to their careers.
• Scholars have also explored the legal and regulatory frameworks surrounding whistleblowing. The enactment of legislation like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the United States and similar laws worldwide has aimed to provide protections for whistleblowers and encourage reporting of corporate misconduct. Researchers have evaluated the effectiveness of these legal safeguards and their impact on corporate governance.
• Case studies of prominent whistleblower cases, such as the Enron and Wells Fargo scandals, have offered valuable insights into the real-world implications of whistleblowers’ actions.
These cases underscore the critical role whistleblowers play in uncovering fraud, prompting investigations, and instigating corporate reforms.
• Whistleblowers play an important role in preventing and detecting corporate fraud. A study by the Government Accountability Office found that whistleblowers were responsible for uncovering over $100 billion in fraud and abuse over a five-year period.
• Whistleblowers face a number of challenges, including retaliation from their employers. A study by the National Whistleblower Center found that over 60% of whistleblowers are subjected to retaliation, including being fired, demoted, or harassed.
The consequences of whistleblowing are another significant area of investigation. Research consistently demonstrates that whistleblowers often endure personal and professional hardships, including job loss, isolation, and psychological stress. Yet, their actions can lead to crucial changes in organizational practices, such as improved compliance, transparency, and corporate governance structures.
The multifaceted nature of whistleblowing, encompassing motivations, consequences, and legal protections, requires ongoing research to inform policy and practice, ensuring that whistleblowers continue to serve as essential safeguards in the corporate world.

                                               CASE STUDIES 

Two landmark case studies that exemplify the critical role of whistleblowers in corporate governance:

  1. Enron Scandal (2001):
    The Enron scandal is an iconic case highlighting the pivotal role of whistleblowers in uncovering corporate misconduct. Enron, once considered one of the most innovative and profitable energy companies, collapsed due to widespread accounting fraud. The case was brought to light primarily by two whistleblowers: Sherron Watkins, an Enron vice president, and Jeffrey Skilling’s subordinate, and former Enron executive vice president, Cynthia Cooper. Sherron Watkins’ internal memo to then-CEO Kenneth Lay, expressing concerns about
    Enron’s accounting practices, was a turning point. Meanwhile, Cynthia Cooper and her
    internal audit team discovered irregularities in financial statements. These brave whistleblowers brought their concerns to top management, instigating internal investigations.
    The Enron scandal led to the bankruptcy of the company, the loss of thousands of jobs, and investors losing billions. It also prompted legislative reforms like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which aimed to improve corporate governance, financial transparency, and whistleblower protections.
  2. Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal (2016):
    The Wells Fargo case underscores the importance of whistleblowers in the banking industry. Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, faced a scandal involving the creation of millions of unauthorized customer accounts to meet aggressive sales targets. The scandal came to light mainly due to the efforts of three whistleblowers: former Wells Fargo employees Erika Cheung, Yesenia Guitron, and former assistant vice president and branch manager, Ricky M. Hansen, Jr.
    These whistleblowers courageously exposed the unethical practices within Wells Fargo. Erika Cheung and Yesenia Guitron raised concerns internally, while Ricky M. Hansen, Jr. reported the misconduct to the U.S. Department of Labor. Their actions triggered investigations by regulators and led to Wells Fargo paying substantial fines and compensating affected customers.
    The Wells Fargo case highlighted the need for strong whistleblower protections in the financial sector and brought renewed attention to corporate culture, ethics, and the role of whistleblowers in safeguarding both consumers and shareholders.

These landmark case studies illustrate how whistleblowers can be catalysts for uncovering corporate misconduct, driving accountability, and ultimately shaping corporate governance reforms. They serve as powerful examples in the study of the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance.

    LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS 

Legal protections for whistleblowers are crucial in encouraging individuals to come forward with information about wrongdoing within organizations. These protections vary by country and jurisdiction, but here are some common legal safeguards available to whistleblowers:

  1. Whistleblower Protection Laws: Many countries have specific laws that protect whistleblowers from retaliation. For example, in the United States, the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) provides legal safeguards for federal employees who report misconduct. Similarly, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act protects employees of publicly traded companies who report financial irregularities.
  2. Confidentiality: Whistleblowers may be allowed to report misconduct anonymously, maintaining their confidentiality. Laws often prohibit employers from disclosing the identity of the whistleblower.
  3. Non-Retaliation Provisions: Legal protections typically include provisions that prevent employers from taking retaliatory actions against whistleblowers. Retaliation can include firing, demotion, harassment, or other adverse employment actions.
  4. Anti-Discrimination Laws: Some countries have anti-discrimination laws that protect whistleblowers. These laws ensure that whistleblowers cannot be discriminated against in hiring, promotion, or other employment decisions because of their disclosure.
  5. Whistleblower Rewards: In some cases, whistleblowers may be eligible for financial rewards or a percentage of the funds recovered as a result of their disclosures. This can serve as an incentive to come forward.
  6. Access to Legal Remedies: Whistleblowers who face retaliation or adverse employment actions can often seek legal remedies through the courts. This may include reinstatement, back pay, or damages for emotional distress.
  7. Government Agencies and Reporting Channels: Many countries have established government agencies or reporting channels where whistleblowers can report misconduct safely. These agencies investigate claims and take appropriate actions.
  8. Protection Against Criminal Prosecution: Whistleblowers who are themselves involved in misconduct may receive immunity from criminal prosecution in exchange for cooperating with authorities and providing evidence.
  9. False Claims Act: In the United States, the False Claims Act allows individuals to bring lawsuits on behalf of the government against organizations engaged in fraudulent activities. Whistleblowers in such cases are entitled to a percentage of the funds recovered.
  10. Corporate Compliance Programs: Some countries require corporations to establish internal whistleblower reporting mechanisms as part of their compliance programs.
  11. International Whistleblower Protections: Some international organizations, such as the United Nations, have established guidelines and protections for whistleblowers who report misconduct in the context of international organizations or projects.

These legal protections and other laws are important because they help to encourage whistleblowers to come forward and report illegal or unethical behavior.By protecting whistleblowers from retaliation, these laws help to ensure that corporations are held accountable for their actions.

                         RECOMMENDATIONS/SUGGESTIONS 

Companies should take the following steps to strengthen their whistleblower protections:
• Establish a formal whistleblower policy.
• Provide whistleblowers with a confidential way to report concerns.
• Protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
• Provide whistleblowers with support and resources.

Also companies should encourage more employees to come forward by:
• Creating a culture of transparency and accountability.
• Promoting open communication between employees and management.
• Providing training on whistleblower rights and responsibilities.

By taking these steps, companies can help to create a more ethical and transparent workplace.

                                             CONCLUSION  

Whistleblowers play an important role in corporate governance. They help to prevent and detect corporate fraud, corruption, and other illegal activities, and they can also help to protect the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. However, whistleblowers often face retaliation from their employers, which can make it difficult for them to come forward. The challenges faced by whistleblowers are significant, but the benefits to society are even greater.

The future of whistleblower laws is uncertain. Some lawmakers are proposing to weaken these laws, while others are working to strengthen them. It is important to ensure that whistleblower laws are strong enough to protect whistleblowers from retaliation, and that they are accessible to all employees. Whistleblowers are essential for a healthy corporate governance system. They help to ensure that companies are operating in a transparent and ethical manner, and they help to protect the public from corporate fraud and abuse.
The legal protections that are available to whistleblowers are important, but they are not always enough to protect them from retaliation. More needs to be done to encourage whistleblowers to come forward and to protect them from retaliation. This includes providing whistleblowers with financial compensation, legal assistance, and job protection. By taking these steps, we can encourage more whistleblowers to come forward and help to make our corporations more transparent and accountable.

                                               BIBLIOGRAPHY  

1) Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational Dissidence: The Case of WhistleBlowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1-16.
2) Gupta, P. (79-103). Corporate frauds in India – perceptions and emerging issues. Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 22, No. 1.
3) Sunitha, D. S. (2018). A Study on Whistle Blowing Mechanism In Corporate India. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM).
4) Shikha Patheja (2015). System of Whistle Blowing in India. International Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 4(7),.361-362.
5) Bhargava, N. (2015). An Overview of Whistleblowing: Indian Perspective. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science and Technology.
6) Archambeault, D. S., & Webber, S. (2015). Whistleblowing101. The CPA Journal, 85(7), 60-64
7) Rachagan, S., & Kuppusamy, K. (2013). Encouraging whistle blowing to improve corporate governance?: A Malaysian ini-tiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 367– 382.
8)https://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2018-1-page-675.htm
9)https://www.iia.org.uk/resources/audit-committees/board-briefings/board-briefingwhistleblowing-and-corporate-governance/
10)https://lawwallet.in/whistleblowing-an-effective-key-to-good-corporate-governance/

The Crucial Role of Whistleblowers in Corporate Governance

By

JYOTI

NIRMIT REDDY

AMITY UNIVERSITY NOIDA

Abstract: Corporate governance is the cornerstone of ethical and transparent business practices, ensuring accountability, fairness, and the protection of stakeholders’ interests. Within this framework, whistleblowers play an important role in uncovering and addressing corporate wrongdoing. This paper examines the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance. It discusses the importance of whistleblowers, the challenges they face & also provides recommendations for how to encourage more whistleblowers to come forward and how to protect them from retaliation.

This paper also examines legal protections and corporate policies aimed at safeguarding whistleblowers, highlighting the need for stronger legal frameworks to encourage reporting.

Key words: Whistleblowers, Corporate governance, legal protections, retaliation.

                                                 INTRODUCTION 

Whistleblowers are individuals who report wrongdoing or illegal activity to an appropriate authority. They play an important role in corporate governance by helping to ensure that companies are operating in a transparent and ethical manner.
Whistleblowers can come from any level of an organization, and they can report a variety of concerns, including financial fraud, employee abuse, environmental violations, and product safety issues. When whistleblowers come forward, they often face retaliation from their employers, including being fired, demoted, or harassed. However, the law protects whistleblowers from retaliation, and they can receive financial rewards for their disclosures.
The role of whistleblowers in corporate governance has been growing in importance in recent years. As companies have become more complex and globalized, it has become more difficult for regulators to keep track of all of their activities. Whistleblowers can provide regulators with valuable information that they would not otherwise have access to.In addition, whistleblowers can help to deter corporate wrongdoing. When employees know that there are people who are willing to report illegal activity, they are less likely to engage in such activity in the first place.

The importance of whistleblowers in corporate governance is clear. They play a vital role in ensuring that companies are operating in a transparent and ethical manner. By reporting wrongdoing, whistleblowers help to protect the public interest and make our society a more just and fair place.

                            OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH 

The objective of this research paper is to examine the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance. The paper will explore the following topics:

1) The definition of whistleblowers and the history of whistleblower laws.
2) The role of whistleblowers in preventing and detecting corporate fraud.
3)The challenges faced by whistleblowers.
4)The benefits of whistleblowers to society.

The paper will conclude with a discussion of the future of whistleblower laws and the role that whistleblowers can play in creating a more transparent and ethical corporate culture.
METHODOLOGY
This research paper seeks to explore the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance, employing a range of methodologies for a comprehensive understanding. The initial step involves an extensive literature review to grasp the current knowledge on the subject. Subsequently, a case study approach will be used to delve deeply into the impact of whistleblowers on corporate governance, providing detailed insights while building upon existing research.

The research paper will be written in a clear and concise style that is accessible to a general audience. Through this multifaceted approach, we aim to contribute significantly to the understanding of whistleblowers’ crucial role in corporate governance.

                                       LITERATURE REVIEW 

The role of whistleblowers in corporate governance is a subject of increasing importance and scrutiny in contemporary business ethics and regulatory landscapes. This literature review provides a comprehensive overview of key themes and findings in this field.
• Whistleblowers, individuals within organizations who expose misconduct or wrongdoing, are recognized as vital guardians of corporate integrity and accountability. Research has delved into various aspects of their role, motivations, and impacts on corporate governance.
• Motivations for whistleblowing have been a central focus. Studies reveal a complex interplay of ethical considerations, personal values, and concerns for public welfare. Whistleblowers often face dilemmas, balancing their commitment to ethical behavior with fears of retaliation and damage to their careers.
• Scholars have also explored the legal and regulatory frameworks surrounding whistleblowing. The enactment of legislation like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the United States and similar laws worldwide has aimed to provide protections for whistleblowers and encourage reporting of corporate misconduct. Researchers have evaluated the effectiveness of these legal safeguards and their impact on corporate governance.
• Case studies of prominent whistleblower cases, such as the Enron and Wells Fargo scandals, have offered valuable insights into the real-world implications of whistleblowers’ actions.
These cases underscore the critical role whistleblowers play in uncovering fraud, prompting investigations, and instigating corporate reforms.
• Whistleblowers play an important role in preventing and detecting corporate fraud. A study by the Government Accountability Office found that whistleblowers were responsible for uncovering over $100 billion in fraud and abuse over a five-year period.
• Whistleblowers face a number of challenges, including retaliation from their employers. A study by the National Whistleblower Center found that over 60% of whistleblowers are subjected to retaliation, including being fired, demoted, or harassed.
The consequences of whistleblowing are another significant area of investigation. Research consistently demonstrates that whistleblowers often endure personal and professional hardships, including job loss, isolation, and psychological stress. Yet, their actions can lead to crucial changes in organizational practices, such as improved compliance, transparency, and corporate governance structures.
The multifaceted nature of whistleblowing, encompassing motivations, consequences, and legal protections, requires ongoing research to inform policy and practice, ensuring that whistleblowers continue to serve as essential safeguards in the corporate world.

                                               CASE STUDIES 

Two landmark case studies that exemplify the critical role of whistleblowers in corporate governance:

  1. Enron Scandal (2001):
    The Enron scandal is an iconic case highlighting the pivotal role of whistleblowers in uncovering corporate misconduct. Enron, once considered one of the most innovative and profitable energy companies, collapsed due to widespread accounting fraud. The case was brought to light primarily by two whistleblowers: Sherron Watkins, an Enron vice president, and Jeffrey Skilling’s subordinate, and former Enron executive vice president, Cynthia Cooper. Sherron Watkins’ internal memo to then-CEO Kenneth Lay, expressing concerns about
    Enron’s accounting practices, was a turning point. Meanwhile, Cynthia Cooper and her
    internal audit team discovered irregularities in financial statements. These brave whistleblowers brought their concerns to top management, instigating internal investigations.
    The Enron scandal led to the bankruptcy of the company, the loss of thousands of jobs, and investors losing billions. It also prompted legislative reforms like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which aimed to improve corporate governance, financial transparency, and whistleblower protections.
  2. Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal (2016):
    The Wells Fargo case underscores the importance of whistleblowers in the banking industry. Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, faced a scandal involving the creation of millions of unauthorized customer accounts to meet aggressive sales targets. The scandal came to light mainly due to the efforts of three whistleblowers: former Wells Fargo employees Erika Cheung, Yesenia Guitron, and former assistant vice president and branch manager, Ricky M. Hansen, Jr.
    These whistleblowers courageously exposed the unethical practices within Wells Fargo. Erika Cheung and Yesenia Guitron raised concerns internally, while Ricky M. Hansen, Jr. reported the misconduct to the U.S. Department of Labor. Their actions triggered investigations by regulators and led to Wells Fargo paying substantial fines and compensating affected customers.
    The Wells Fargo case highlighted the need for strong whistleblower protections in the financial sector and brought renewed attention to corporate culture, ethics, and the role of whistleblowers in safeguarding both consumers and shareholders.

These landmark case studies illustrate how whistleblowers can be catalysts for uncovering corporate misconduct, driving accountability, and ultimately shaping corporate governance reforms. They serve as powerful examples in the study of the role of whistleblowers in corporate governance.

    LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS 

Legal protections for whistleblowers are crucial in encouraging individuals to come forward with information about wrongdoing within organizations. These protections vary by country and jurisdiction, but here are some common legal safeguards available to whistleblowers:

  1. Whistleblower Protection Laws: Many countries have specific laws that protect whistleblowers from retaliation. For example, in the United States, the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) provides legal safeguards for federal employees who report misconduct. Similarly, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act protects employees of publicly traded companies who report financial irregularities.
  2. Confidentiality: Whistleblowers may be allowed to report misconduct anonymously, maintaining their confidentiality. Laws often prohibit employers from disclosing the identity of the whistleblower.
  3. Non-Retaliation Provisions: Legal protections typically include provisions that prevent employers from taking retaliatory actions against whistleblowers. Retaliation can include firing, demotion, harassment, or other adverse employment actions.
  4. Anti-Discrimination Laws: Some countries have anti-discrimination laws that protect whistleblowers. These laws ensure that whistleblowers cannot be discriminated against in hiring, promotion, or other employment decisions because of their disclosure.
  5. Whistleblower Rewards: In some cases, whistleblowers may be eligible for financial rewards or a percentage of the funds recovered as a result of their disclosures. This can serve as an incentive to come forward.
  6. Access to Legal Remedies: Whistleblowers who face retaliation or adverse employment actions can often seek legal remedies through the courts. This may include reinstatement, back pay, or damages for emotional distress.
  7. Government Agencies and Reporting Channels: Many countries have established government agencies or reporting channels where whistleblowers can report misconduct safely. These agencies investigate claims and take appropriate actions.
  8. Protection Against Criminal Prosecution: Whistleblowers who are themselves involved in misconduct may receive immunity from criminal prosecution in exchange for cooperating with authorities and providing evidence.
  9. False Claims Act: In the United States, the False Claims Act allows individuals to bring lawsuits on behalf of the government against organizations engaged in fraudulent activities. Whistleblowers in such cases are entitled to a percentage of the funds recovered.
  10. Corporate Compliance Programs: Some countries require corporations to establish internal whistleblower reporting mechanisms as part of their compliance programs.
  11. International Whistleblower Protections: Some international organizations, such as the United Nations, have established guidelines and protections for whistleblowers who report misconduct in the context of international organizations or projects.

These legal protections and other laws are important because they help to encourage whistleblowers to come forward and report illegal or unethical behavior.By protecting whistleblowers from retaliation, these laws help to ensure that corporations are held accountable for their actions.

                         RECOMMENDATIONS/SUGGESTIONS 

Companies should take the following steps to strengthen their whistleblower protections:
• Establish a formal whistleblower policy.
• Provide whistleblowers with a confidential way to report concerns.
• Protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
• Provide whistleblowers with support and resources.

Also companies should encourage more employees to come forward by:
• Creating a culture of transparency and accountability.
• Promoting open communication between employees and management.
• Providing training on whistleblower rights and responsibilities.

By taking these steps, companies can help to create a more ethical and transparent workplace.

                                             CONCLUSION  

Whistleblowers play an important role in corporate governance. They help to prevent and detect corporate fraud, corruption, and other illegal activities, and they can also help to protect the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. However, whistleblowers often face retaliation from their employers, which can make it difficult for them to come forward. The challenges faced by whistleblowers are significant, but the benefits to society are even greater.

The future of whistleblower laws is uncertain. Some lawmakers are proposing to weaken these laws, while others are working to strengthen them. It is important to ensure that whistleblower laws are strong enough to protect whistleblowers from retaliation, and that they are accessible to all employees. Whistleblowers are essential for a healthy corporate governance system. They help to ensure that companies are operating in a transparent and ethical manner, and they help to protect the public from corporate fraud and abuse.
The legal protections that are available to whistleblowers are important, but they are not always enough to protect them from retaliation. More needs to be done to encourage whistleblowers to come forward and to protect them from retaliation. This includes providing whistleblowers with financial compensation, legal assistance, and job protection. By taking these steps, we can encourage more whistleblowers to come forward and help to make our corporations more transparent and accountable.

                                               BIBLIOGRAPHY  

1) Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational Dissidence: The Case of WhistleBlowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1-16.
2) Gupta, P. (79-103). Corporate frauds in India – perceptions and emerging issues. Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 22, No. 1.
3) Sunitha, D. S. (2018). A Study on Whistle Blowing Mechanism In Corporate India. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM).
4) Shikha Patheja (2015). System of Whistle Blowing in India. International Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 4(7),.361-362.
5) Bhargava, N. (2015). An Overview of Whistleblowing: Indian Perspective. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science and Technology.
6) Archambeault, D. S., & Webber, S. (2015). Whistleblowing101. The CPA Journal, 85(7), 60-64
7) Rachagan, S., & Kuppusamy, K. (2013). Encouraging whistle blowing to improve corporate governance?: A Malaysian ini-tiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 367– 382.
8)https://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2018-1-page-675.htm
9)https://www.iia.org.uk/resources/audit-committees/board-briefings/board-briefingwhistleblowing-and-corporate-governance/
10)https://lawwallet.in/whistleblowing-an-effective-key-to-good-corporate-governance/

Corporate Governance in Indian Companies

Introduction

Corporate Governance refers to the framework in a company comprising the generally accepted practices, policies and processes according to which the firm operates and is managed.

Corporate governance has become an essential component in the functioning of a company, and it has the potential of causing an improved or enhanced market performance. Corporate governance primarily focusses on creating transparency, accountability, and disclosure in the corporate environment. In other words, it promotes ethical practices in the company, allows for efficient communication of information, and proper allocation of responsibility. Another important function of corporate governance is to maintain a judicious balance between the interests of the stakeholders and board of directors. The board of directors are primarily responsible for the operational decisions and processes of the company, and it is imperative to outline their authority with respect to the stakeholders to ensure mutual cooperation and corporate success.

With regard to India, corporate governance has been on the up rise mainly due to globalization and liberalization. The SEBI had made the first ever regulations on corporate governance in 2000, based on the recommendations of the Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee Report and Narayan Murthy Committee Report. With the many national and multinational corporations coming up in India in the face of globalization, there was a need to introduce corporate governance so as to confront the competition that has arisen. Therefore, it is apparent that good corporate governance ensures mutual cooperation and protects the long-term interests of the shareholders. The question then arises whether good corporate governance is also proactively helping companies in their regular financial performance.

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance

The financial performance of a firm indicates how successful it has been in its business, and whether it has been able to effectively use its assets in generating revenue. The role that corporate governance plays in benefiting financial performance of Indian companies has been studied extensively over the past years, and varying conclusions can be derived from these studies. The many variables and principles of corporate governance have been studied in the Indian corporate environment so as to ascertain their impact on financial performance. These can be consolidated as such:

  • Board Size: A study conducted by researchers Kathuria and Dash observed the influence of the Board size on financial performance of Indian companies. The results showed that performance improved when the size of the board increased, and that a smaller board of directors was generally not influential in financial growth. Corporate governance principles necessitate that the board of directors collaborate with the other corporate entities so as to ensure better performance.
  • Board Independence: An independent director is one who does not have any vested interest in the company, and works solely to improve the corporate position and credibility of the firm. They also play a large role in enforcing corporate governance standards. Numerous studies conducted with regard to board independence in the Indian context have showed that a larger proportion of independent board directors is associated with improved financial performance.
  • Board Meetings and Committees: As corporate governance principles require the company to maintain transparency and disclosure, conduction of regular board meetings is required. It has been found that Indian companies conducting regular board meetings has caused a better financial performance, as there is constant discussion of the company’s operations and decisions are made that positively impact the company.

Therefore, from the research conducted, it is evident that sound corporate governance and its implementation in Indian companies has the potential of positively impacting financial performance and growth. Some of the more general reasons why corporate governance is seen as a stimulant of financial growth are:

  • Increased access to financing
  • Higher firm valuation
  • Improvement in operational performance
  • Reduced risk of financial crises

Conclusion

Ultimately, it can be inferred that the impact of corporate governance on Indian companies has been known to be favourable for the most part. However, it is important to highlight an important point here. It cannot be concluded that corporate governance has a positive effect on all Indian companies, or for all companies in general. For some there may be an insignificant impact, while for others there might be no impact at all. However, for most companies in most industries, corporate governance implies support in the financial position. Factors mentioned in this paper such as board size, independency, composition, meetings and committees mostly seem to show a positive relationship with financial performance of Indian companies.

The primary goal with which corporate governance is introduced into a company is to increase transparency, disclosure and accountability, which subsequently gives way to other long-term benefits including financial stability and growth. Therefore, many Indian companies are increasingly looking to practice corporate governance. In conclusion, despite the fact that there is no consensus on whether corporate governance has an undeniable positive impact on financial and firm performance, it can be said that it helps the company in many facets regardless.