International news flow after the end of colonialism




The mass media are seen today as playing a key role in enhancing globalization, facilitating culture exchange and multiple flows of information and image between countries through international news broadcasts, television programming, new technologies, film and music. If before the 1990’s mainstream media systems in most countries of the world were relatively national in scope, since then most communication media have become increasingly global, extending their reach beyond the nation-state to conquer audiences worldwide.

International flows of information have been largely
assisted by the development of global capitalism, new technologies and the increasing commercialisation of global television, which has occurred as a consequence of the deregulation policies adopted by various countries in Europe and the US in order to permit the proliferation of cable and satellite channels. Globalization theorists have discussed how the cultural dimension of globalization has exercised a profound impact on the whole globalization process.

The rapid expansion of global communications in the 21st century can be traced back to the mechanical advancements of technologies during the course of the 18th and 19th centuries, which started mainly with the invention of the telegraph in 1837, and included the growth in postal services, cross-border telephone and radio communications and the creation of a modern mass circulation press in Europe. It was however the evolution of technologies capable of transmitting messages via electromagnetic waves that marked a turning point in advancing the globalization of
communications.

The emergence of international news agencies in the 19th century, such as Reuters, paved the way for the beginnings of a global system of codification. Nonetheless, it was not until the 1960’s, with the launch of the first geo-stationary communication satellites, that communication by electromagnetic transmission became fully global, thus
making the globalization of communications a distinctive phenomena of the 20th century.

Key theories in international communications grew out of international relation studies. The “modernization” or development” theory in the area of communication research
emerged in the Cold War context and were largely preoccupied with the ways in which the media could help transform traditional societies to include them into the capitalism orbit. Among the key theorists in this tradition was Wilbur Schramm with his sponsored UNESCO work, Mass Media and national development – the role of information in the developing countries.

The idea was that international communication media could be used
as a tool to transfer the political-economic model of the West to the growing independent societies of the South. Schramm’s views was that the mass media could be used by elites to
raise the ambitions of the populations in developing countries, who would cease to be narrow-minded and conformist and would be active in their own self-development. The dependency theories the 1960’s and 1970’s were perceived as an alternative approach grounded in neo-Marxism, and which adopted a theoretical framework that saw
capitalism and inequality as a key perspective in understanding the impact of power relations on global communications. According to the argument, transnational corporations based in the North engaged in a web of interdependency with the economies of the South, setting the terms of global trade, dominating markets, production and labour.

Dependency theorists and Latin American scholars argued that these economic relations worked within an exploitative dependency model that promoted American capitalist mentality in developing countries (Mattelart, 1979). Development was thus shaped in a way that benefitted largely the developed nations, maintaining the peripheral countries in a continuous position of dependence. Latin American scholars stressed that it was Western
media companies that were reaping the rewards of the modernization programmes, and that they were actually reaching out to the South in order to conquer new markets for their
products.

Globalization is thus seen as having consequences for the distribution of power and wealth both within and between countries. Cultural imperialism theories of the 1970’s and 1980’s highlighted how the media in developing countries imported foreign news, cultural and television genre formats (i.e. talk-shows, sitcoms) and also values of capitalist consumerism and individualism. The core critique of the imperialism thesis was that the
developing countries had established a relationship of subordination.

Written by : Ananya Kaushal

MONOPOLY

The Sherman Antitrust Act was the first federal act that outlawed monopolistic business practices. In the US Sec 2 of Sherman act, 1890 makes it unlawful for a company to achieve monopoly power, and Sec 7 of Clayton act 1914 prevents mergers of companies that will lessen competition or lead to a monopoly. The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers from any kind of unfair practices taking place in the market places. Similarly in India, the Competition Commission of India has the responsibility to ensure fair and healthy competition in economic activities, to eliminate practices adversely affecting competition. All over the world, similar government agencies are constantly developing regulations and laws to keep the marketplace clean and just.

Big tech companies are now under the intense scrutiny of competition watchdogs around the world. In the US antitrust charges are filed against Google and are accused of protecting the monopoly, bipartisan lawsuits filed against it say Google search engine and play store is anticompetitive. French completion watchdog fined google $268 million for abusing its dominant position and asked it to pay for news to the publishers. Australia too directed google to pay for news content.

In India, big techs are at loggerheads with the government over the new IT rules. Both have different perceptions regarding certain aspects. The new IT rules make it mandatory for companies having a users base of more than 50 lakhs(5 million) to appoint a chief compliance officer, nodal officer, and grievance officer in the country all residents of India. Also in India, data protection laws are at a very nascent stage and are underdeveloped and incapable of protecting its citizens’ data from any kind of misuse.

Developed nations are now recognizing the unquestionable power big companies enjoyed so long. Recently G7 countries agreed on a 15% global minimum corporate tax which they say aims to discourage large corporates from avoiding tax by shifting bases.

So basically nations arround the world are conserned about tax evasion, unfair business practices, and lack of rules and regulations to restrict powers of monopolistic companies.While it is legal for companies to adopt strategies for reducing taxable income, tax evasion tactics by using it dominance is unacceptable.There is difference between gainging monopoly and afterwards using it for sustaining monopoly. I am of the option that if companies are providing quality products and services and gaining monopoly it’s fine but sustained hold of monopoly for long period can make them all too powerful, and that is why we need dynamic regulations in place to check their power.