What Gen Bipin Rawat Has Said Is Hundred Percent Right

Let me begin on a cheerful note by first and foremost expressing my utmost happiness to note that finally we have one such Army Chief who believes very firmly in dealing with rogue nations like Pakistan who never understands the language of peace which India has been speaking always since the last seven decades. Instead our peace policy has always been taken to be our biggest weakness which alone explains that why they have mercilessly been carrying out proxy war against India since ages as their clear cut policy is “To make India bleed by giving thousand cuts”. It is our politicians who are more responsible than Pakistan for allowing to take India for granted always! Nothing in India can ever happen without consent of politicians because it is they who have the remote control of all power!
                                     It is our politicians who frittered away the gains of our Army in 1948, 1965 and most of all in 1971 when inspite of winning decisively they handed back more than 93,00 Pakistani surrendered soldiers back to them even though they did not hand over many of our soldiers who bore the maximum brunt of their torture as was testified by none other than former Pakistan PM late Zulfikar Ali Bhutto who said he could not sleep in prison as in the adjoining barrack Indian soldiers captured in 1971 war were tortured mercilessly whole night and whole day! Why Pakistan Occupied Kashmir was not taken back? This alone explains why I believe that politicians are more dangerous than Pakistan who are ever ready to play politics even with the lives of our soldiers and completely ignore what happens to them!  
                                         Why just after two to three months after the Kargil war planned and masterminded by the Pakistani invader Gen Pervez Musharraf did India decide to accord a red carpet welcome to him and shower flowers on him? Did he really deserve this? Why Indian politicians very conveniently forgot that it was Musharraf who was responsible for masterminding the killing of more than 600 of our brave soldiers and had threatened to nuke India if we stepped even one inch inside their territory as he felt Pakistan alone has the right to invade and he alone had the unfettered right to come 14-15 km inside Indian territory just before Kargil war started to boost his soldiers morale to most brutally kill our soldiers as he himself very proudly acknowledges?
                                         Pakistan badly failed to capture even an inch in Kargil and even did not claim the dead bodies of its soldiers especially of Northern Light Infantry Regiment and India cremated them in India. Even in 1988 when Gen Musharraf was Brigadier, Pakistani Army under his leadership tried to snatch Siachen but again there too they failed miserably! Yet our politicians unnecessarily made a hero out of a failed and most frustrated person which he never deserved! Now he is a “proclaimed offender” in his own Pakistan!
                                              Coming back to the main subject, Army Chief General Bipin Rawat has said that surgical strikes conducted across the Line of Control last September were a message to Pakistan and more such strikes would be undertaken if needed. Speaking at an event in New Delhi on September 25, Gen Rawat said that, “The strikes were more of a message we wanted to convey and these things could follow if need be”. When asked how capable India was to carry out more such operations, he said: “All that I can say is that you can count on us.”
                                               It may be recalled here that close on the heels of four Pakistani terrorists attacking an Indian Army unit’s administrative base in Uri on September 18, 2016, J&K killing 18 soldiers, the Army carried out surgical strikes on terrorist launch pads near the Line of Control in Pakistan. The strikes conducted on September 28, 2016 had inflicted significant casualties on terrorists which Pakistan will never admit. Pakistan was completely caught napping as they never even dreamt that India which believed until now only in honouring Pakistani invaders like Gen Musharraf on its soil and in kowtowing in front of him could strike back with such a vengeance!   
                                              Following the surgical strikes, India was seen as a stronger nation, one that retaliates, Gen Rawat said. Let me add here further that just like after Kargil war when our political leadership bent overbackwards to invite a defeated Pakistani invader Gen Pervez Musharraf who could not summon even the courage to lead his troops from forward the world looked down upon India as a weak country! I still fail to understand why our politicians ignored that this same Gen Musharraf had ordered Captain Saurav Kalia and 5 soldiers to be brutally tortured for not just 1 day or 5 days or 10 days or 15 days or 20 days but for full 22 days and their whole body bore signs of unspeakable torture, cigarette signs, their eyes were punctured with hot iron rods and pulled out, same with ears, nose and even their private parts were not spared and finally they were shot in head and their body maimed and mutilated was handed over to India and yet decided to accord red carpet welcome to him just two to three months after Kargil war?
                                          Gen Musharraf had even paid Rs 1 lakh as cash prize to dreaded Al Qaeda leader Iliyas Kashmiri who earlier was in Pakistani Army when he beheaded and presented his beheaded head as trophy to Gen Musharraf as was reported in most English dailies in 2000! Still some of our journalists, big media houses and our politicians shamelessly honoured him as if he had done a great job! This only left him more emboldened and he hailed terrorists like Osama and Hafiz as “Osama to hero hain ji hero. Hafiz Saeed to bilkul aasli hero hain ji. Bharat ke liye yeh aatankwadi hain paar hamare liye to ye hero hain ji hero. Dawood is also in Pakistan somewhere in Karachi but why should we disclose this to India or hand him over.” He is accused of plotting murder of former Pakistan PM Benazir Bhutto, attack on Lal Masjid in Pakistan which left many dead and was also accused of killing Nawab Bukhti in Baluchistan and is also facing trial in many other cases. Still some of our big journalists and leaders shamelessly laugh and feel proud to talk with him and slam Gen Rawat as “Sadak ka goonda”! This has to change now and it is our leaders who must change first and foremost in dealing with Pakistan!
                                     Why Most Favoured Nation status to Pakistan is continuing unilaterally since 1996 shamelessly and most unfortunately even though we are daily losing our brave soldiers fighting the proxy war perpetrated by Pakistan since last more than four decades? Why in UN we condemn them as “Terroristan” but yet keep engaging them? Why all relations with Pakistan which is a rogue nation are not being nuked? Why Pakistani Indians who chant “Pakistan, Pakistan and nothing but Pakistan” are not being deported to Pakistan as we see in the case of Rohingyas? Kuwait has ordered all Pakistanis to leave Kuwait as they feel that they are a threat to their nation but why we refrain from doing so even though it is India who is worst affected by proxy war perpetrated against India by Pakistan? Ask politicians ruling in Centre!  
                                         This NDA government is now hardening its stance slowly but it needs to do a lot more and never repeat the foolish mistake of inviting Pakistani ISI agents to Pathankot to inspect terror spots where terrorists had attacked and killed our soldiers and even a Major and Lieutenant Colonel! I am happy to note that Gen Rawat when asked if terrorists would attempt to carry out another Uri-like attempt said categorically that, “Terrorists will keep coming because their camps are operating there. But we are prepared to receive them and send them to their graves and bury them two and a half feet inside.”
                                              This is what is required and our political leadership too must like Gen Rawat demonstrate more resolve in giving a free hand to deal mercilessly with such Pakistani Indians who attack our soldiers, misbehave with them so that no one again dare misbehave with our soldiers! Disrespect of Indian soldiers by anyone whether they are Kashmiris or Pakistanis or anyone else be it even me should never be tolerated even slightly under any circumstances!
                                          Happy to note that in the latest incident, security forces had foiled a terror attack on a military camp in Uri sector killing four militants mercilessly near Line of Control! Our politicians too must learn something from Gen Rawat and completely boycott Pakistan till it dismantles all terror camps and deport terror leaders to India so that they can be tried and punished accordingly! Why we are keeping so many Pakistani diplomats in India and allowing them to meet Hurriyat leaders and fish in troubled waters? Why security at taxpayers expense for Hurriyat leaders and not jail who always rant against India and plot with terror leaders as was disclosed recently by NIA?
                                               All this must end forthwith and Gen Rawat is hundred percent right that following the strikes, India was seen as a stronger nation, one that retailiates! This must continue always! No compromise on this must be made ever! Politicians must now emulate what Gen Rawat has said and immediately nuke all relations with Pakistan!  
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.   

Quantum Leap In Relations Between India And Japan

It is a well known fact that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe have shared special chemistry with each other since a long time which dates back to the time when Modi was the Chief Minister of Gujarat. Both India and Japan have come a long way in forging a special relation with each other ever since Modi became Prime Minister three years ago. But in last one year or so we have witnessed a quantum leap in relations between India and Japan for which both Modi and Abe are equally responsible.
Quantum Leap In Relations Between India And Japan

                                      As we all know, Shinzo Abe came to India on a two day visit from September 13 to 14 to attend the 12th Indo-Japan annual summit held at Ahmedabad. PM Modi, PM Abe and his wife set-off on a 8 km roadshow in an open-roof jeep for the legendary Sabarmati Ashram where Mahatma Gandhi had spent a significant time of his life and they were accorded a grand welcome throughout the route. PM Modi presented a marble idol of Mahatma Gandhi’s “Three Wise Monkeys” to his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe as the monkeys are a symbol of the adage “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” which is believed to have its origin in Japan.  
                                   It would be pertinent to note that India and Japan on September 14, 2017 during the 12th Indo-Japan summit  signed 15 Memorandum of Understanding (MoUs), which dealt with wide ranging issues such as bilateral relations, defence and security cooperation and supporting each other for a permanent seat in the United Nations expanded Security Council. This is truly a landmark development. People of both the countries must feel happy about it.
                                            It merits no reiteration that the track record of both India and Japan is impeccable and therefore both are strong contenders to bag a permanent seat in the UN Security Council. While it cannot be denied that no figure was released on how much Japanese companies planned to invest in India, some sources said that it would be around Rs 5 lakh crore, including the flagship bullet train project from Ahmedabad to Mumbai. Now let us go through the 15 key MoUs signed between India and Japan. They are as follows: –
                    Disaster Risk Management
1.    Memorandum of Cooperation between the Home Ministry and the Cabinet Office of Japan. Cooperation and collaboration in the field of disaster risk reduction and to share the experiences, knowledge and policies on disaster prevention.
            Skills Development
2.    Further strengthening bilateral relations and cooperation in the field of Japanese language education in India between Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Japan.
               Connectivity
3.    India Japan Act East Forum signed to enhance connectivity and promote developmental projects in the North Eastern Region of India.
         Economic & Commercial
4.     Aims to send fresh food from Japan to India in cool boxes for Japanese in India.
           Investment
5.  India-Japan Investment Promotion Roadmap between DIPP and METI to facilitate and accelerate the Japanese investments in India.
6.  Agreement between METI and Gujarat Government to cooperate in infrastructure development on ‘Japan-India special programme for Make in India’ in Mandal Bechraj-Khoraj in Gujarat .
               Civil Aviation: Open Skies
7.  Exchange of record of decisions (RoD) on Civil Aviation Cooperation (Open Sky). Indian and Japanese carriers can now fly unlimited number of flights to the select cities of each other’s countries.
                   Science & Technology
8.  Deal for International Joint Exchange Programme signed between interdisciplinary theoretical and mathematical sciences programme (ITHEMS), RIKEN and National Centres for Biological Sciences (Simons-NCBS) to establish a Joint Exchange Programme to identify and foster talented young scientists from both India and Japan to collaborate in the field of theoretical biology.   
9.  Joint Research Contract between National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST), Japan and Department of Biotechnology (DBT) to conduct joint research and to establish an International Center named as “DBT-AIST International Center for Translational & Environmental Research (DAICENTER)” at AIST, Japan.
10. MoU b etween DBT and National Institute of Advanced Science & Technology (AIST). To promote research collaboration between DBT Research Institutes and AIST in the field of life sciences and biotechnology.
                      Sports
11.    International Academic and Sports Exchange between Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education (LNIPE) and Nippon Sports Science University, Japan (NSSU). To facilitate and deepen international education cooperation and exchanges between the sports bodies.
12. International Academic and Sports Exchange between Sports Authority of India and Nippon Sports Science University, Japan.
13.  Letter of intent between Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education (LNIPE) and University of Tsukuba, Japan.
14. Letter of intent between Sports Authority of India and University of Tsukuba, Japan.
                        Academics/Think Tank
15. MoU between RIS and IDE-JETRO for promotion of Cooperation in Research Related Activities. To promote institutional cooperation between RIS and IDE-JETRO to strengthen research and effectiveness of dissemination of research findings.
                                    Let me hasten to add here that adding an icing on the cake in the relations between India and Japan is the launching by Prime Minister Narendra Modii and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo  Abe of the 508-km long bullet train project between Ahmedabad and Mumbai. It will take 2 hours and 58 minutes to cover the 508 km stretch. The project cost is estimated at Rs 1.10 lakh crore.
                             Truth be told, Modi thanked Abe for the “big gift from Japan to India” even as the Japanese PM attributed it to the “special bond” between the two nations. Speaking at the jam packed Sabarmati Railway Stadium, Abe hoped the first bullet train in India would soon make its route to other parts of the country. He also said amid a huge applause that, “The next time I am in India, I wish to ride the Shinkansen with Mr Modi and enjoy the beautiful scenery of India through the windows”.
                            To put things in perspective, Abe said after the two leaders pressed a button, unveiling a plaque that, “A strong India is in Japan’s interest and a strong Japan is in India’s interest”. There can be no denying it and this alone explains why both India and Japan have agreed to work together and cooperate on multiple fronts. He said the first letters of his country, ‘Ja’, and that of India, ‘I’, together make up the word “Jai” or victory. After starting his speech with “Namaskar” and ending it with a “Dhanyavad” said proudly that, “Jai India, Jai Japan”.
                                It must be brought out here that India’s first bullet train is being built with a Japanese soft loan of Rs 88,000 crore, which India will pay back in the next 50 years at 0.1 percent interest. Modi was candid enough to admit that this was not a loan but a gift. He very rightly said that, “We are building India’s first bullet train practically free”.
                             It also must be brought out here that the target for the completion of India’s first bullet train is December 2023, though officials say there are indications that the Government may seek an earlier deadline of 2022. A 21-km-long tunnel will be built between Bolsar and Bandra Kurla Complex in Mumbai, of which seven km will be under the sea. Initially, the train will have 10 coaches with a total seating capacity of 750 passengers. Later, it is proposed to have 16 coaches with a seating capacity of 1250 passengers.
                                  Be it noted, the bullet train will have 12 stops of 165 seconds each. The proposed stations are Mumbai, Thane, Virar, Bolsar, Vapi, Bilimora, Surat, Bharuch, Vadodara, Anand, Ahmedabad and Sabarmati. This ambitious project will reduce the travel time between Ahmedabad and Mumbai from seven hours to less than three hours. PM Modi was very elated and called Abe his “close friend” which the latter also reciprocated.
                              To be sure, Modi made a candid admission that, “The dreams and ambitions of this ‘new India’ are limitless. India has taken a big leap today to fulfil a long-held dream. Fast trains, top technology will bring us top growth, employment and progress.” He also added that, “India has taken a big leap today to fulfil a long-held dream. Fast trains, top technology will bring us top growth, employment and progress.”
                            While mincing no words in expressing his gratitude to Abe, Modi said that, “Japan too has shown today what a great friend it is to India. India’s first bullet train project is a symbol of this friendship. Abe has ensured this project sticks to time.” He also added further that, “This is not the time to progress at low speed. The speed of this country’s progress now depends on the high-speed connectivity”. Modi also castigated the Opposition for criticising the project without any valid reason. Modi certainly has a valid point here.      
                                   Simply put, Modi said that, “They first asked where’s the bullet train and now say why the bullet train”. In 1964, Modi said that Japan started the bullet train and now this technology was in 15 countries. He also said while justifying his decision to bring such a transportation marvel to India that, “From Europe to China, the bullet train’s image can be seen everywhere. Not just economical but also societal changes have been brought about by these trains”. 
                                     It is imperative to note here that the target for its completion is December 2023, though officials say there are indications that the Government may seek an earlier deadline of 2022. The train will stop at each of the 12 railway stations on the route, but only for 165 seconds. A 21-km-long tunnel will be dug between Boisar and BKC in Mumbai, of which 7 km will be under water. The two Prime Ministers also laid the foundation for an institute that will come up in Vadodara where nearly 4,000 people will be skilled for the bullet train project.
                              It also warms the inner cockles of my heart to learn that in a stern message to Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe in their joint statement strongly pitched for a ‘zero-tolerance’ approach towards terrorism. In the statement signed after their bilateral talks in Gandhinagar in Gujarat on September 14, the two leaders asked Islamabad to bring to book the perpetrators of terror strikes, including those involved in the Mumbai (2008) and Pathankot (2016) attacks. They also called upon international community to work towards rooting out terrorist safe havens and infrastructure, disrupting terrorist networks and financing channels and halting cross-border movement of terrorists. The joint statement said, “They (Modi and Abe) looked forward to convening the fifth Japan-India Consultation on Terrorism and to strengthening cooperation against terrorist threats.”                                    
                                  Needless to say, while making it clear that India and Japan will be intensifying their collaboration in the counterterrorism measure, Modi and Abe in their joint statement underlined the need for all countries to ensure that their territory is not used to launch terrorist attacks on other nations. They also expressed firm resolve towards strengthening international cooperation to address the challenges of nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. It is a no-brainer that to eliminate terrorism all peace loving countries have to come forward and unitedly take collective steps to ensure that this Frankenstein monster is crushed once and for all!
                                    What should not be missed out here is that the joint statement very categorically said that, “They emphasized the need for stronger international partnership in countering terrorism and violent extremism, including through increased sharing of information and intelligence. They called for enhanced bilateral cooperation in this regard.” Also, India and Japan will jointly hold a consultation on terrorism in the coming months.
                                    Truly speaking, while condemning the growing menace of terrorism and violent extremism, the two PMs shared the view that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations is a global scourge that must be forcefully combated through concerted global action in the spirit of “zero tolerance”. Accordingly, the leaders called upon all UN-member countries to implement the UNSC Resolution 1267 and other relevant resolutions designating terrorist entities and emphasized the need for stronger international partnership in countering terrorism and violent extremism, including through increased sharing of information and intelligence.   
                           As it turned out, the two PMs also reiterated their desire and determination to work together to maintain and promote peace, stability and development in the Indo-Pacific region. They also both reaffirmed the importance of freedom of navigation, overflight and unimpeded lawful commerce in accordance with international laws. The joint statement said that, “They also highlighted the importance of peaceful resolution of disputes, including through full respect for legal and diplomatic processes, without resorting to the threat or use of force, and in accordance with the universally recognized principles of international law, notably the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).                                           
                             It is of immense significance that a memorandum of understanding to set up India Japan Act East Forum with an aim to align India’s Act East Policy with Japan’s Free and Open Asia-Pacific strategy in the backdrop of China’s One Belt One Road initiative is among the major agreements signed while Abe was in India for the 12th Indo-Japan annual summit. The forum will enhance connectivity and promote developmental projects in India’s Northeast region in an efficient and effective manner, according to the MoU signed following the summit in Gandhinagar on September 14. It must be said here that Japan has a historic connection with the Northeast and is among the few countries that India has allowed a presence in the eight landlocked states which are the country’s gateway to the Association of Southeast Asian Nation members.
                                    While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that India and Japan on September 14 also signed a document on Japanese loan and aid for highway development in the Northeast that can complement India’s connectivity initiatives in Bangladesh, Myanmar and beyond, besides BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal) and BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation) Motor Vehicle Agreements. Japan will extend a loan of Rs 2,239 crore to India for ‘North East Road Network Connectivity Improvement Project’ to improve the National Highway 40 (NH-40) and construct a bypass on NH-54 in the Northeast. The project is expected to contribute to the improvement of the intra-regional and international connectivity through regional economic development.
                                    For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that Japan is keen to expand infrastructure projects in Southeast Asia amid China’s OBOR initiative and along with India, it is exploring opportunities to develop projects in ASEAN. This is part of Indo-Japan corridor conceived last year for the Indo-Pacific region that also extends to Eastern Africa under Asia Africa Growth Corridor which is an initiative that would provide an alternative to OBOR, which is being implemented in a non-transparent fashion dictated by China’s interests. Both countries agree that improving connectivity between Asia and Africa is vital for achieving prosperity of the entire region.
                                      It also cannot be lost on us that the two countries have decided to seek synergy between India’s ‘Act East’ Policy and Japan’s Expanded Partnership for Quality Infrastructure’, by closely coordinating, bilaterally and with other partners, for better regional integration and improved connectivity as well as industrial networks based on principles of mutual consultation and trust. Briefly stated, the development of the Northeast is a priority for India and a key to promote its Act East Policy. Japan has also placed a special emphasis on cooperation in the Northeast for its geographical importance of connecting India to Southeast Asia and historical ties. We all know fully well that Japanese forces had fought British in Manipur during World War II.
                                It is a matter of great satisfaction to note that apart from fresh investment proposals at the summit, Modi claimed that Japan’s foreign direct investment (FDI) to India had actually trebled in the past few years which is a testimony to the growing economic ties. So far, around $ 25.7 billion has flown in as FDI from Japan and the plan is to double this by 2019. Modi and Abe also used the summit to jointly condemn North Korea’s latest nuclear test and uranium enrichment activities, urging the hermit nation to comply with UNSC resolutions.
                                       To say the least, the talks were not just confined to economic and diplomatic cooperation. Japan has agreed to help India build a convention centre in Varanasi. Calling it a symbol of cultural cooperation between the two countries, Modi said that Abe had conceptualized it during his last visit to the town. Japan and India also welcomed the renewed momentum for trilateral cooperation with the US and Australia and resolved to work with regional partners to ensure a rule-based order in the Indo-Pacific region.
                              Let me be direct in saying: India and Japan have both realised that to counter China’s hegemony they have to act in unison. Both countries are not on very good terms with China. Japan has also realized that India can be a good partner in security related matters and an alliance will benefit not just India but also Japan which is not so strong militarily.
                                  Kanwal Sibal who is an eminent, most sought after expert in analyzing most complicated foreign affairs and is one of the most reputed former Foreign Secretary of India very rightly points out that, “Both, India and Japan, have problems with China on territorial issues and on Beijing’s muscle-flexing. Japan has long been China’s rival in the western Pacific; now India is seen as China’s potential rival in Asia. China’s hegemonic ambitions in Asia are becoming increasingly apparent. If China succeeded in its quest for dominating Asia, it would be at the cost of India and Japan, and neither country would accept the situation. So far Japan has relied on the US for its security but with Obama failing to oppose China’s expansionism in the South China Sea and Trump questioning the assumptions underlying the US-Japan alliance and creating uncertainty about the future course of US foreign policy, Abe has tried to widen his security options by reaching out to India, which alone in Asia, by virtue of its size, growing economic strength and substantial military capabilities, can check China’s ambitions. Therefore, while the alliance with the US remains the anchor of Japan’s security policies, Tokyo is enlarging its security base by drawing closer to India.”   
                                   All said and done, both India and Japan have a lot to gain from each other. It is most heartening to note that in last few years there has been a quantum leap in relations between India and Japan and both countries have come a lot closer to each other than earlier. It is certainly a matter of some concern that there has been a decline in India-Japan trade from $18.61 billion in 2012-13 to $13.48 billion in 2016-17, though Japanese investments in India have increased. This needs to be set right on a war footing. It cannot be ignored that earlier it was Abe who was the driving force in making the India-Japan Civil Nuclear Agreement operational. Abe’s visit has certainly come as a shot in the arm in the bilateral relations between India and Japan and India has many reasons to cheer for this visit.    
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Safety And Security Must Be Given The Top Priority

Let me begin by first and foremost expressing my profound sorrow and grief for the lives of all those who have died in Mumbai on September 29 because of poor infrastructure in our railway stations. Those who have lost their near and dear ones are very angry and very rightly so! Safety norms are accorded the last priority in our country.
Safety And Security Must Be Given The Top Priority

                                    Instead Swachh Abhiyan is accorded the first priority which can only ensure cleanliness but not safety and security of citizens. PM Narendra Modi has made it very clear time and again which he keeps repeating every now and then that Swachh Abhiyan is his top priority and all citizens must contribute. Why so casual and disingenuous approach towards security and safety of people?
                                       No one can disagree with the PM that Swachh Abhiyan should be accorded importance but I strongly disagree that it should be given top priority. I also very strongly believe that cleanliness is next to Godliness but hell to cleanliness or Swachh Abhiyan if safety and security is not provided. People will be killed  in large numbers as we are seeing right now before our eyes how so many precious people have died. This keeps happening time and again yet no lesson is learnt and once again Swachh Abhiyan which is PM Modi’s pet project starts capturing all headlines in all news channels and at other places.  
                                          What is the point of Swachh Abhiyan if people are not safe and they can get killed anywhere because of total criminal apathy of officials in maintaining bridges, rail bridges, platforms, roads, flyovers etc? To hell with it! People want safety first. People want security first.
                                       Why when our soldiers are daily getting killed since last many decades on borders as also other places and so are the people at the hands of Pakistani soldiers and terrorists sent after fully training and arming them by Pakistani Army and ISI is our political establishment not ready to nuke all relations with Pakistan? Why India is not ready to revoke the unilateral Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status to Pakistan which we had wrongly conferred on them way back in 1996? Why trade and commerce with a country that exports death, terrorists, terror and havoc in India?
                                             Why Centre is ready to deport Rohingyas who illegally entered India but not those Pakistanis who keep shouting slogans in support of Pakistan and keep waving Pakistani flags and keep burning Indian flags and want India to become Pakistan? Why Rohingyas were allowed to go as far as Jammu and Kashmir and settle there which can disturb the extremely hostile atmosphere much more and worsen the already complicated situation there? Why were they allowed inside India at the first place?
                                         Why so negligence towards the safety and security of people? Why even the slaughtered bodies of more than 45 Hindus at the hands of Rohingyas is not forcing politicians to become more security conscious? Why are States being allowed to play vote-bank politics?
                                            Why terrorists are repeatedly killing our soldiers as happened with Lt Umar Fayyaz and now with Mohammad Ramzan Parray but Centre is refusing to arm them with weapons by which they can defend themselves and their family? Parray was shot dead and 4 of his relatives were injured including one women relative. But still Modi keeps talking Swachh Abhiyaan! Why is safety and security relegated to second place when it comes to people but accorded highest priority when it comes to politicians especially those who are Ministers or Chief Ministers or Prime Minister?
                                            Safety and security of people must come first, always and every time. Everything else later! Why those who attack our soldiers are not treated as Pakistanis and enemy soldiers? Why are they dealt with soft cushion? Why no hard line policy is followed in dealing with them?
                                      Why no surgical strike against traitors sitting in India who keep inciting violence and keep attacking our soldiers with stones, grenades and other weapons? Why are they allowed to roam free? Why security is provided from taxpayers money for separatists Hurriyat leaders who keep ranting against India and why even when police officer deployed for their security is killed most brutally by their followers publicly does Centre not withdraw all security to them?
                                        Why even Supreme Court Judge Anil Dave too had said that he too was concerned about security worth crores being spent on Hurriyat leaders? Do they really deserve it? Why are they not sent behind bars and why only house arrest for them even when their hand is explicit in so many terror cases?
                                    Why when Kuwait can severe all ties with Pakistan and order all Pakistanis to leave their country as they keep encouraging terror activities is the same policy not followed in India even though it is India and not Kuwait which has lost more than lakh soldiers to proxy war sponsored by Pakistan? Why can’t all Pakistanis be told to leave India? Why we allow security breach by permitting all kinds of people like Pakistanis in India?
                                          Why MFN status for Pakistan? Do they deserve it? How long will appeasement policy continue and that too not of Indian Muslims but of Pakistan which is our sworn enemy? Why the huge army of Pakistani diplomats not reduced to the minimum? Why they are allowed to meet Hurriyat leaders and spread hatred and conspire to harm India in the worst manner?
                                        Why those corrupt officials, babus and netas who mint money and compromise on safety and security of citizens by making third rated bridges, roads, rail platforms not punished most severely? Why Prevention of Corruption Act is not amended to mandate compulsory death penalty for those indulging in corruption and due to which people lose their precious lives? Why just keep talking only about Swachh Abhiyaan and caring a damn for security and safety?
                                           Why Citizenship Act is not amended to ensure that those who burn Indian flags, chant pro freedom slogans and abuse India are deprived of citizenship and sent to the country in whose support they raise flags and shout slogans as we keep seeing in the case of Pakistanis? Why Centre is not enacting a Uniform Criminal Code or Uniform National Code to ensure this? Why should sedition be applied on those who don’t consider themselves Indians?
                                          Why they should not be deported to the country which they like? Why is citizenship being forced on Pakistanis who hate India? Why should they be given the benefits of Indian citizenship? Why should they not be treated like foreigners and Pakistanis who have just no right in India? Why no surgical strike here?
                                        Why when Centre can spend lakhs and crores on bullet trains is it unable to spend  few crores on the safety and security of citizens? Why the lives of ordinary man in India considered so cheap that every year we hear thousands losing their life in one tragedy or the other and most of them due to lack of safety and security measures like rail tracks not being repaired in time etc yet Centre accords top priority to Swachh Abhiyaan and not to safety and security of citizens?           
                                      It is high time and now Centre must take suggestions and constructive criticism in the right spirit and implement them earnestly. Centre must always espouse Swachh Abhiyaan as PM desires but not at the cost of safety and security of citizens which has to come above everything else! No compromise should be made on it even if UN criticizes us or UK based human right organizations like Amnesty International criticizes us or anyone else as we see in China which alone explains that why it is treated with awe and respect!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.    

Reveal Action Taken Against MPs Whose Assets Shot Up: SC

Coming straight to the nub of the matter, let me start by first and foremost pointing out that with the income and assets of 11 Rajya Sabha and 26 Lok Sabha MPs showing a phenomenal jump, in some cases even more than 800 percent, the Supreme Court on September 6 asked the Centre to reveal what action was taken by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) against the high profile elected representatives after this list was submitted to the agency by a NGO way back in June 2015. Why no strict action against them? Why has a long rope been extended to them?
Reveal Action Taken Against MPs Whose Assets Shot Up: SC

                                        While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that since the list included party bigwigs, several Ministers in the Central Cabinet and former Ministers, the Court gave CBDT the choice to submit action taken information to Court by September 12 either by way of affidavit or in sealed cover. This is a very serious issue as it concerns the integrity of our MPs who are the lawmakers of our nation. The Apex Court was hearing a petition by NGO Lok Prahari represented by former bureaucrat SN Shukla seeking transparency in disclosure of source of income of assets of candidates, their families and dependents in the nomination form. Shukla rightly demanded that such investigation must be time-bound and the names be revealed in public interest.
                                         For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that the list of Rajya Sabha MPs whose income showed a phenomenal rise in five years period included Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Rout (841 percent increase), BSP’s Satish Chandra Mishra (698 percent), Congress’s Jairam Ramesh (659 percent), Congress Ambika Soni (501 percent), BJP’s Piyush Vedprakash Goel (214 percent), BJP’s Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi (154 percent), Samajwadi Party’s Amar Singh (138 percent) and RJD’s Ram Jethmalani (119 percent) among others. I very strongly feel that they must be asked to explain how their income showed a meteoric risein five years period. I also am of the firm opinion that if they are unable to satisfactorily explain why their income showed such a meteoric increase then that should be seized away from them.
                             No doubt, if this is done so, it will send a right, loud and clear message to all that MPs too are not above the law. They too will have to face the axe if they dared to violate the provisions of any law. They will not be treated as being above law just because they are MPs.
                                    Let me submit here that the increase was measured by comparing their affidavit submitted in 2016 with the assets declared in the previous election. The Lok Sabha list of reelected MPs whose income and assets between 2009 and 2014 grew by over 500 percent included Congress chief Sonia Gandhi (537 percent), BJP’s DV Sadananda Gowda (588 percent), BJP’s Arjun Ram Meghwal (608 percent), SP chief Mulayam Singh Yadav (613 percent), BJP’s Varun Gandhi (625 percent), BJP’s Shatrughan Sinha (778 percent), AIADMK’s P Venugopal (1281 percent), Trinamool Congress’s Sisir Kumar Adhikari (1700 percent), Muslim League’s ET Mohammad Basheer (2081 percent) and BJP’s Kamlesh Paswan (5649 percent) among others. This merits a serious and impartial probe.
                                             Let me hasten to add here that the CBDT received this list from Lok Prahari on June 30, 2015. The CBDT in an earlier affidavit had revealed that the list was forwarded for action to the Director General Income-Tax [DGIT] (Investigation). The Bench of Justices J Chelameswar and S  Abdul Nazeer of the Apex Court found the affidavit vague and sought details of action taken against persons named in the list.
                                 Needless to say, it is most unfortunate that the Apex Court found the affidavit vague. It should have been very clear right at the first instance. But the CBDT failed to do its homework properly on this which caused the Supreme Court to raise its eyebrows!
                                      What is most concerning to note is that the Supreme Court observed on September 12 that, “MLAs and MPs who face investigation for possessing wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income, always tend to bounce back to power. This is a phenomenon seen in the past 25 to 30 years.” The hearing on a petition filed by Lok Prahari seeking a mechanism to investigate the source of income of politicians, saw the Centre give details of a probe into the assets given by Lok Prahari of 26 Lok Sabha members, 11 Rajya Sabha members and 257 MLAs in a sealed cover.
                                          To put things in perspective, a Bench of Justices J Chelameswar and S Abdul Nazeer asked if this phenomenon of returning to power, coupled with the mercurial rise in the assets of politicians just within a span of five years between two successive elections, was a product of ineffective investigation or of some “immunity” provided to them. Justice Chelameswar addressed the government saying that, “If an MLA’s or MP’s assets have seen a 10X [10 times] rise in 2019 from what he revealed in 2014 should you not conduct an inquiry into the very propriety of a person holding public office enjoying such phenomenal rise in his assets… The moment a candidate has shown 1,000% increase in his income in the past five years, please have a mechanism to conduct an enquiry.”
                                           Not stopping here Justice Chelameswar also held that, “Income under each head should be probed. All these should be inquired. The public needs an answer. The people should get to know the state of affairs. It is not enough that a legislator discloses a legitimate source of income. It is important to inquire that how did the person get in that position to earn that income.”
                                        As it turned out, the Supreme Court on Septemebr 12 asked the government to consider legislating on setting up of new fast track courts to expedite criminal case trials against parliamentarians and legislators. The Apex Court Bench which was given the names of seven Lok Sabha MPs and 98 MLAs across the country by the CBDT whose assets had seen a substantial hike in between two elections, also said it had perused the names of these politicians and will examine the issue. The verification is pending against 9 Rajya Sabha MPs and 42 MLAs. It said Parliament had the competence to come up with a law and create necessary infrastructure for setting up of such courts for speedy disposal of cases against lawmakers.
                                      Be it noted, the Bench said that, “With regard to MPs and MLAs, it falls under the domain of Parliament. It has the necessary competence to come up with a law. Make law and create necessary infrastructure. Except for some specific tribunals, no new courts have come up. You (Centre) should create new courts and infrastructure as at present, the Government of India is spending only one or two percent of the budget (judicial system). This would also reduce the huge pendency.” It also pulled back no punches in pointing out that inadequate infrastructure in the courts was resulting in pendency and said that Parliament should pass laws and create fast-track courts for speedy disposal of such cases against the lawmakers. Attorney General KK Venugopal agreed that fast track courts were the need of the hour and said that some such courts have in the past done an excellent job and several people, especially those in jails, were benefitted by the system.   
                                         To put it bluntly, taking a strong exception to the Centre’s failure in disclosing action taken against politicians whose assets have jumped manifold between two elections, the Supreme Court on September 6 ordered the government to place the necessary information before it within seven days. The court pulled up the government after its counsel failed to provide data on how many enquiries has the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) initiated against politicians whose assets have seen a massive jump, in some cases up to 500%, after their elections. It said that, “Why can’t you (central government) provide basic data? You are not averse to electoral reforms but have not placed any necessary details. Is this the attitude of the government of India? What have you done till now?”
                                           Truth be told, Centre said it was not averse to the prayers made in the PIL but the directions sought did not lie within the judicial domain. The counsel argued that  an elaborative consultation process has to be undertaken to amend the law. He said that, “All stakeholders need to be taken on board. Data needs to be elicited before we can suggest the changes”. He cited the Centre’s flagship project – Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and said “It is not about cleaning of garbage only”.
                                        It is a no-brainer that the lawyer’s eloquence failed to cut ice with the Bench. It said that, “You better file a detailed affidavit. This affidavit which you have filed is nothing but typed papers. Do not make vague statements. If the CBDT has taken some action, please disclose what action has been taken”. The Bench, however, gave liberty to the government to furnish the data in a sealed cover and also told the lawyer that give reasons if you do not want the information to be made public.
                              Truly speaking, Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) which is an NGO working in the area of political and electoral reforms too has moved an intervention application in the case. It has claimed that assets of 4 current Lok Sabha MPs have increased by 1200%. 22 MPs have declared an asset increase of over 500%. One newly elected Rajya Sabha MP Anil Madhav Dave has declared an asset growth of over 100% since he last filed his affidavit. It also said that seven other newly elected Rajya Sabha MPs have declared increase of over 200%.
                                      On the face of it, the CBDT in its affidavit had indicated prima facie discrepancy with known sources of income in the case of 7 Lok Sabha MPs and 98 MLAs but on the disclosure of names, the affidavit stated that investigation report by DGIT is exempt under Section 24 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Hence these reports cannot be shared in public. But the CBDT added, “The certified true copy of the reports received from DGIT (Investigation) will be submitted separately in sealed cover for the perusal of the Supreme Court.”  
                                       It must be added here that the Attorney General KK Venugopal pointed out that the right to privacy now declared a fundamental right, the returns filed by individual candidates is part of his/her privacy that needs to be protected. The Bench said it will have to be balanced against the citizen’s right to know under Article 19(1)(a) for determining which interest is superior. Although Centre refused to disclose details claiming immunity available to DGIT investigation under Right to Information Act, the Bench wondered whether such immunity can exist for lawmakers when people have a Constitutional right to know details of their elected representatives. Justice Chelameswar quoted the Vohra Committee report pertaining to nexus between politicians, businessmen and bureaucrats and said nothing has changed since then! Absolutely right!
                             “What happened after that? Is it not high time we did something about it?” the Apex Court asked Venugopal as it reserved its order on a PIL that wants it mandatory for politicians to declare their and their family members sources of income at the time of filling up nomination papers. The department court felt, should ascertain the factors that lead an MLA and MP to amass huge wealth within a short span of time.          
                                    All said and done, Centre must come clean on it. When PM Narendra Modi wants highest transparency from the people by giving the detailed account of each and every source of income then why should MPs and MLAs be exempted from it? Why should political parties be exempted from it? Why Modi has never spoken on this? Why even no explanation has been sought leave alone action from those MPs and MLAs whose assets have shot up immensely in a very short span of time?
                                         Let me be direct in asking: Why BJP and Congress got 77% donations from unknown sources in 2016? Even Delhi High Court had recently expressed its anger over BJP and Congress getting foreign funds which they were unable to explain the sources from which they got! Supreme Court is absolutely right that Centre must reveal what action it has taken against MPs whose assets have shot up disproportionately! Centre just cannot afford to be a silent spectator as by doing so it will only invite the ire of the highest court of India – Supreme Court! When Centre wants people to give their account of each and every rupee then why MPs and MLAs should at all be exempted? Why Centre allowed a former Rajya Sabha MP and a big business tycoon Vijay Mallya to escape very conveniently to England even after he owed Rs 9000 crore to various banks and had not paid salary to his employees for a long period? Why among the unknown sources of funding, maximum funds were collected under “voluntary contributions” by the BJP, which amounted to Rs 459.56 crore in fiscal 2016 as was revealed by Association for Democratic Reforms? Why rules and regulations only for common man? Why not for MPs, MLAs, political parties and powerful?
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.