By Kavita Dehalwar
The Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) is an innovative public transportation solution designed to provide fast, efficient, and cost-effective transit services in urban areas. By integrating features traditionally associated with rail systems, such as dedicated lanes, rapid boarding, and high service frequency, BRTS aims to deliver the benefits of rapid transit systems like metros or trams but at a significantly lower cost.
This article will explore the concept, design, features, benefits, and challenges of BRTS, alongside examples of successful implementations worldwide.
1. What is BRTS?
Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) is a high-quality bus-based transit system that operates on dedicated lanes, known as busways, ensuring faster travel times by avoiding the usual traffic congestion that affects traditional bus services. BRTS combines the flexibility of buses with the speed and capacity of rail systems, thus providing an affordable alternative to more expensive infrastructure-heavy solutions like subways.
Key Elements of BRTS:
- Dedicated Lanes: The hallmark feature of BRTS is its use of bus-exclusive lanes, allowing buses to avoid general traffic, thus ensuring faster transit times.
- Priority at Intersections: BRTS often incorporates traffic signal priority, meaning buses receive green signals before other vehicles to further reduce delays.
- Modern Stations: BRTS stations are well-designed, often resembling metro stations, with features like platform-level boarding, real-time information, and passenger amenities.
- Articulated or Double-Decker Buses: Buses used in BRT systems are often larger than regular city buses, maximizing passenger capacity.
- Frequent and Reliable Service: High service frequency reduces waiting times, and reliability is improved with dedicated infrastructure and scheduling.
2. Key Features of BRTS
a) Dedicated Bus Lanes
Dedicated lanes are one of the most important features of any BRTS. By removing buses from mixed traffic, these lanes enable fast and reliable service. These lanes are typically marked with distinct colors or signage and are off-limits to other vehicles.
- Median Bus Lanes: Positioned in the center of the road, ensuring buses avoid the congestion often found in curbside traffic.
- Curbside Bus Lanes: Positioned on the outer side of roads, providing an easier integration into the city but often more prone to obstruction from parked or turning vehicles.
b) Platform-Level Boarding
Similar to train or metro systems, BRTS stations are designed with platforms that align with the floor level of buses. This eliminates the need for passengers to climb steps, making boarding quicker and easier, especially for elderly, disabled, or wheelchair-bound passengers. It also reduces bus dwell times at stops, enhancing efficiency.
c) Fare Collection Before Boarding
To save time and minimize delays at stops, many BRT systems adopt an off-board fare collection system, where passengers pay their fare before boarding the bus, often via ticket machines or contactless systems at stations. This system reduces boarding times and eliminates the need for onboard fare transactions.
d) Real-Time Information Systems
Many BRTS networks are equipped with real-time tracking and passenger information systems, which provide updates about bus arrival times and service delays. These systems use GPS to monitor buses and relay accurate data to passengers via digital boards, apps, or announcements at stations.
e) High-Capacity Buses
BRT systems often use buses that are larger than typical urban buses. These may include articulated buses, which are longer and have two sections connected by a pivoting joint, or even double-decker buses. This allows BRT systems to carry more passengers per bus, reducing crowding and improving the overall experience.
f) Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
BRT systems are often planned in coordination with Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), where residential, commercial, and recreational spaces are developed around BRT corridors. This fosters a higher density of population and activity around transit systems, encouraging the use of public transport.
g) BRT Stations
Unlike traditional bus stops, BRT stations are often enclosed, providing shelter and amenities like seating, real-time information displays, and sometimes even shops or kiosks. Stations are usually placed at major intersections or hubs, making them convenient for a large number of passengers.
3. Benefits of BRTS
a) Cost-Effective
One of the major advantages of BRTS is its cost-effectiveness compared to rail-based systems. Constructing a metro or light rail system involves significant infrastructure investments, whereas BRTS can be implemented using existing roadways with relatively minor modifications.
- Lower Infrastructure Costs: BRTS avoids the expensive tunneling, tracks, and stations associated with rail systems.
- Rapid Implementation: BRTS projects can be completed in a fraction of the time needed for rail systems, enabling cities to address transit needs quickly.
b) Flexibility and Scalability
BRTS systems are highly flexible. Buses can easily deviate from dedicated lanes when necessary, serving a broader range of areas. The system is also scalable, allowing for gradual expansion as demand grows or as funding becomes available.
c) Environmentally Friendly
By promoting the use of public transport, BRTS can help reduce the number of private vehicles on the road, leading to lower emissions and reduced traffic congestion. Many modern BRT systems also use eco-friendly buses powered by electricity or low-emission fuels, further enhancing their environmental benefits.
d) Improved Accessibility and Equity
BRTS provides affordable, fast, and reliable transport options to a large portion of the population, including underserved communities. By making transportation more accessible, BRTS promotes equity, especially for individuals who rely on public transit to access jobs, education, and healthcare.
e) Enhanced Urban Mobility
The speed and reliability of BRTS lead to enhanced mobility for urban residents. By reducing travel times and providing frequent service, BRTS helps make cities more accessible and livable.
f) Reducing Traffic Congestion
BRT systems have the potential to significantly reduce road traffic by providing a reliable and attractive alternative to private vehicle use. Dedicated lanes ensure that BRTS is not subject to the delays caused by traffic congestion, making it a more appealing option for daily commuters.
4. Challenges and Limitations of BRTS
a) Space Requirements
Implementing dedicated bus lanes in dense urban environments can be a challenge, as it may require reallocating road space or even acquiring additional land. In some cases, dedicated lanes can lead to resistance from drivers and businesses concerned about reduced car access or parking.
b) Maintenance and Management
Like all transit systems, BRTS requires proper maintenance and management. Poorly maintained infrastructure, including bus lanes and stations, can lead to system inefficiencies, delays, and reduced passenger satisfaction. Regular maintenance and robust operational management are critical for the long-term success of BRTS.
c) Overcrowding and Capacity
In rapidly growing cities, BRTS systems can sometimes become victims of their own success. As ridership increases, buses may become overcrowded, reducing comfort and efficiency. While articulated buses can accommodate more passengers, there is a limit to how much capacity BRTS can offer compared to heavier rail systems.
d) Public and Political Support
Successful implementation of BRTS often requires strong public and political support. In some cases, resistance from local businesses, car users, or residents may slow down or impede BRTS development. Effective communication about the long-term benefits of BRTS is essential to gaining the necessary support.
5. Global Examples of Successful BRTS
a) Curitiba, Brazil
Curitiba is often cited as one of the earliest and most successful examples of BRTS implementation. The system was introduced in the 1970s, featuring dedicated busways, high-capacity articulated buses, and integrated urban planning. Curitiba’s BRTS became a model for other cities around the world.
b) Bogotá, Colombia – TransMilenio
TransMilenio, Bogotá’s BRT system, is one of the largest and most well-known BRT networks globally. Launched in 2000, it features a network of dedicated lanes, modern stations, and large, articulated buses. TransMilenio has played a significant role in improving urban mobility in Bogotá, reducing congestion, and offering a reliable transit option for millions of people.
c) Ahmedabad, India – Janmarg BRTS
Ahmedabad’s Janmarg BRTS, launched in 2009, is considered a success story in India. It features dedicated bus corridors, a focus on high-quality service, and integration with other forms of public transit. Janmarg has improved mobility in Ahmedabad while reducing travel times and pollution.
d) Istanbul, Turkey – Metrobüs
Istanbul’s Metrobüs system is another excellent example of BRTS implementation. The Metrobüs operates in a densely populated and traffic-congested city, providing a vital alternative to private vehicles. With over 50 km of dedicated lanes and buses running frequently, the system serves millions of passengers daily.
e) Mexico City, Mexico – Metrobus
Mexico City launched its Metrobus system in 2005, and it now has over 100 kilometers of dedicated bus lanes. This BRTS has significantly reduced travel times for commuters and contributed to the city’s goal of reducing air pollution and improving urban mobility.
Conclusion
The Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) offers a practical, efficient, and cost-effective solution to urban transportation challenges. By combining the speed and reliability of rail systems with the flexibility and affordability of buses, BRTS is transforming public transportation in cities worldwide. Its implementation brings numerous.
References
Basso, L. J., Feres, F., & Silva, H. E. (2019). The efficiency of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems: A dynamic congestion approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 127, 47-71.
Hidalgo, D., & Muñoz, J. C. (2014). A review of technological improvements in bus rapid transit (BRT) and buses with high level of service (BHLS). Public Transport, 6, 185-213.
Jaiswal, A., Dhote, K., Krishnan, R., & Jain, D. (2012). Bus rapid transit system: a milestone for sustainable transport: a case study of Janmarg BRTs, Ahmedabad, India. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(11), 45-62.
Kathuria, A., Parida, M., Ravi Sekhar, C., & Sharma, A. (2016). A review of bus rapid transit implementation in India. Cogent Engineering, 3(1), 1241168.
Wirasinghe, S. C., Kattan, L., Rahman, M. M., Hubbell, J., Thilakaratne, R., & Anowar, S. (2013). Bus rapid transit–a review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 17(1), 1-31.
Sharma, S. N. (2005). Evaluation of the JnNURM Programme of Government of India for Urban Renewal. Think India Journal, 8(2), 1-7.
Eduindex News 
You must be logged in to post a comment.