Citation
Ezeme, P. E., & Ohabuenyi, J. (2026). The Comparative Assessment of Nigerian and Ugandan Gender Policies. International Journal of Research, 13(4), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.26643/ijr/edupub/14
1Ezeme, Paulinus Ejiofor
Department of Political Science,
Faculty of the Social Sciences,
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Email: paulinus.ezeme@unn.edu.ng
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3638-7360
2**Jonas Ohabuenyi**
Department of Political Science, Faculty of the Social Sciences,
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Email: jonas.ohabuenyi@unn.edu.ng
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3614-7864
Corresponding author***
Abstract
Since women’s rights and participation are impacted by historical, societal, legal, and institutional issues, gender equality is a significant issue in both Nigeria and Uganda. The changes in gender policy in Nigeria and Uganda are examined in this essay. Comparing the efficacy of gender laws in the two nations, identifying obstacles to their full implementation, and making policy recommendations for enhancing gender parity were the goals. The study uses a doctrinal research strategy, which includes a thorough examination of international frameworks, state policies, and legal documents pertaining to gender equality in Nigeria and Uganda. The results demonstrate how the legal systems in Uganda and Nigeria have significantly improved gender equality. However, it will be challenging to successfully apply these laws due to social opposition, a lack of finance, insufficient institutional ability, and unpredictable political will. The study comes to the conclusion that, despite advancements, legislation pertaining to gender equality can occasionally be challenging to implement due to societal biases, a lack of political will, and a lack of funding. The study suggests, among other things, improving the competence of institutions in charge of carrying out gender policy and fortifying institutional frameworks.
Keywords: Comparative Assessment, Gender Policies, Institutional Structures, Legal Frameworks, Socio-Cultural
Introduction
In many facets of society, such as economic empowerment, educational access, and violence prevention, gender policies are essential for creating equal opportunities and protections. Smith and Sinkford (2022) argue that promoting gender equality is not only a legal or economic necessity but also requires altering deeply rooted social norms, creating inclusive institutional structures, and changing policy frameworks in order to acknowledge and address the particular difficulties faced by women and gender minorities. Two African nations with distinct historical trajectories and complex social dynamics—Nigeria and Uganda—make compelling arguments for examining gender policy reform projects throughout the continent. This study aims to identify barriers and practical solutions for achieving gender equality by comparing and contrasting their approaches, offering knowledge pertinent not just to these two countries but also to the greater African context.Gender inequality is a major barrier to social progress in Uganda and Nigeria, impacting development, human rights, and overall societal well-being. Despite efforts to address these issues, cultural, economic, and political constraints have impeded the implementation and effectiveness of gender programs (Hervías Parejo & Radulović, 2023). Gender roles and actions in Uganda and Nigeria now are greatly influenced by past occurrences. For example, indigenous gender relations were changed and patriarchal norms were often reinforced by colonial laws and social institutions that privileged men’s access to formal employment, education, and leadership roles (Ajibade et al., 2020). The strengthening of regional and religious divisions brought forth by British colonial authority had distinct effects on gender roles in Nigeria’s North and South (Olonade et al., 2021). However, Uganda’s colonial experience under British rule resulted in unique social and economic policies that specifically changed the roles of men and women in politics and the economy (Sseremba, 2023). Women’s social standing, access to resources, and capacity for decision-making were all impacted by a number of firmly embedded gender norms, notwithstanding post-colonial efforts to bridge these gaps.Both Uganda and Nigeria have made strides toward enacting laws and policies that promote gender equality. For instance, according to UN Women (2021), Uganda’s Constitution recognises women’s rights and has several provisions, such as affirmative action programs to increase the representation of women in politics. Nigeria’s National Gender Policy (NGP) places a strong focus on women’s rights, political participation, and the eradication of gender-based violence (Okunade et al., 2023). However, the effectiveness of these tactics varies widely due to differences in political will, cultural resistance, and financial allocation. Nigerian implementation gaps are sometimes brought about by differences in how policies are carried out in various states, primarily because of the influence of customs and religion (Adenekan, 2022). Although Uganda is more progressive in certain ways, there are still problems with implementation, especially in rural areas where traditional ideas may clash with gender norms (UN Women, 2021). Gender legislation is still difficult to change, despite significant progress in both countries.
Frameworks and Initiatives for National Policy
Nigeria
The gender equality policies in Nigeria are the outcome of intricate relationships between regional differences, cultural norms, and legislative frameworks. Nigeria has passed important legislation to combat gender-based violence and advance gender equality, but the country’s diverse ethnic and religious terrain makes it difficult to completely achieve these objectives. Initiatives to advance gender parity include the following:
The historic Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (2015) seeks to end all forms of violence against women, including female genital mutilation, sexual harassment, and domestic abuse. The Act offers survivors legal protection and forbids harmful behaviours like forced marriage and spousal abuse. Nigeria, like Uganda, finds it difficult to put this law into effect, especially in areas where its goals clash with regional traditions and religious beliefs.
By encouraging female education, economic involvement, and protection against gender-based violence, Nigeria’s National Gender Policy aims to lessen gender inequities. Maternal mortality, gender-based violence, and the under-representation of women in government are some of the challenges that the strategy aims to address. Despite the policy’s broad goals, there are geographical differences in women’s access to healthcare, education, and employment prospects due to its uneven implementation. Gender initiatives encounter strong opposition in northern Nigeria, where traditional cultural and religious beliefs may restrict women’s rights (Olonade et al., 2021).
Uganda
Uganda has made great progress in passing legislation that protects women’s rights, prevents gender-based violence, and grants access to healthcare and education. The country’s national policy frameworks aim to promote gender parity and protect women’s rights, but there are still barriers to their effective execution and the achievement of measurable outcomes for women. The following is a list of the operational frameworks.
The Domestic Violence Act (2010) is a significant piece of legislation in Uganda that addresses financial, psychological, and physical abuse in homes (Ahimbisibwe, 2023). It provides victims of domestic abuse with legal protection in addition to safety measures like shelters and legal aid. However, enforcing the Act has been challenging due to a lack of funds, inadequate training for law enforcement officers, and persistent cultural ideas that normalise violence against women.
According to Mukasa et al. (2024), Uganda’s Gender Policy was developed to address gender inequities and promote gender equity in areas like education, health, employment, and political involvement. The policy encourages the creation of gender-sensitive programs and activities in order to empower women and give them equal opportunity. For instance, the policy emphasises the importance of women’s participation in leadership and decision-making processes, as well as their access to financial resources and healthcare.
The 1995 Ugandan Constitution, which gives equal rights to all persons, including special protections for women, enshrines gender equality. The Constitution mandates that men and women have equal opportunities in all spheres of life, including employment, education, and political participation. This legislative framework serves as the foundation for numerous gender-sensitive government programs and is crucial to the advancement of gender equality. The Constitution is reformist, but because of deeply ingrained sociocultural practices and viewpoints that still marginalise women, its implementation has proven challenging.
Frameworks for Law and Policy Encouraging Gender Equality
One important piece of Nigerian legislation that supports equal rights and aims to stop discriminatory practices against women is the National Gender Policy (2006), which has been revised to the National Gender Policy 2021-2026. Aspects of women’s rights covered by this policy include their access to economic opportunities, healthcare, education, and decision-making (Ayamba et al., 2024). By prohibiting violent actions like female genital mutilation, domestic violence, and the destruction of widowhood customs, the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (2015) further promotes gender equity (The National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons [NAPTIP], 2022). However, poor enforcement procedures and uneven state-by-state implementation frequently undermine the efficacy of these legislation.A strong legal basis for gender equality in Uganda is provided by the 1995 Ugandan Constitution, which ensures equal rights for men and women in a number of areas of life, including employment, education, and political involvement (Ndagire, 2022). Another important piece of legislation that attempts to shield people from gender-based violence is the Domestic Violence Act (2010), which forbids domestic abuse and establishes victim support programs. Despite the progressive legislative framework, Bauer (2021) pointed out that societal beliefs that normalise gender inequity and violence against women, especially in rural regions, frequently impede the execution of these laws.
Opportunities for Economic Growth and Education
In order to advance gender equality, economic growth and education are crucial. Economic opportunities guarantee that women can become financially independent and actively engage in society, while access to education allows them to raise their social and economic standing. The Ugandan Ministry of Education and Sports (2015) reports that female enrolment in basic and secondary schools has significantly improved and that there is gender parity in elementary education. Teenage pregnancy, child marriage, and cultural beliefs that value boys’ education over girls’ are barriers that prevent women from pursuing an education (UNICEF, 2015). Furthermore, many women still do not have access to higher education, particularly in rural areas. More focused efforts are required to reduce gender-specific educational barriers, even though programs like Universal Secondary Education (USE) and Universal Primary Education (UPE) have shown promise.Barriers like early marriage, poverty, and gender-based violence continue to prevent girls from attending school despite the Nigerian government’s efforts to improve girls’ education, especially through programs like the Girls’ Education Programme Phase 3 (GEP3) (Egberi & Madubueze, 2023). Additionally, women’s access to credit, financial resources, and land ownership is restricted, particularly in rural areas, which limits their economic potential (Udoh, 2024). Gender discrimination and a lack of support for work-life balance further hinder women’s involvement in the formal employment market.
Gender-Based Violence
In both Nigeria and Uganda, gender-based violence (GBV) is a major obstacle to attaining gender equality. According to O’Mullan et al. (2024), gender inequality and power disparities are the main causes of GBV, which disproportionately affects women and girls. The goal of Uganda’s 2010 Domestic Violence Act is to shield women and children from emotional, sexual, and physical abuse (Amegbor & Pascoe, 2021). GBV is nevertheless common despite this legal framework, and survivors have little access to support services, especially in rural regions (Anguzu et al., 2022). Women find it challenging to pursue justice due to societal beliefs that favour violence against women as well as inadequate law enforcement and support networks.Among the most common types of gender-based violence in Nigeria include child marriage, female genital mutilation, and domestic abuse (United Nations, 2020). By giving victims legal protection and punishing criminals, the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (2015) aims to solve these problems. However, Mshelia (2021) noted that enduring obstacles to implementation include deeply ingrained patriarchal practices, a lack of public awareness, and inadequate legislative enforcement. Furthermore, because of cultural taboo, GBV is frequently underreported, and survivors frequently struggle to access mental and legal support.
Thinking About Uganda’s and Nigeria’s Gender Policy Reforms
The challenging process of changing gender policy in Nigeria and Uganda must include the removal of long-standing institutional, legal, and societal barriers to gender equality. In addition to enacting new laws, this reform aims to create an atmosphere that promotes significant social, political, and economic change. Therefore, a comprehensive approach to reforming gender policy is required, considering the connections between legislative frameworks, societal norms, and women’s involvement in governance (Okunade et al., 2023; Vijeyarasa, 2021). This section looks at the legal and regulatory frameworks, women’s rights and participation, gender-based violence (GBV), access to economic and educational opportunities, and inclusive governance structures—all of which are essential to the reform process in both nations.
Structures of Inclusive Governance
In order to achieve gender equality, inclusive governance is essential since it ensures that women’s opinions are heard during decision-making processes. According to the United Nations Development Programme, UNDP (2022), the Ugandan Equal Opportunities Commission works to ensure that men and women have equal access to opportunities and resources and has helped close gender inequalities in a variety of areas. However, women continue to be under-represented in the executive, judicial, and local branches of high-level government. To promote gender-inclusive governance, more work is needed to ensure that women have a meaningful voice in policy decisions and to increase the representation of women in important jobs.Affirmative action laws have considerably improved women’s political representation in Nigeria, although they are still under-represented in high-level positions, particularly in local government and traditional leadership roles. Gender-inclusive governance institutions must not only promote women’s participation but also provide an environment where women can reach their leadership potential without fear of discrimination or violence (World Health Organization, 2017).
Engagement in Women’s Rights and Governance
Improving women’s rights and involvement in governance is a crucial part of changing gender policy. To guarantee that policies represent their needs and viewpoints, women must participate in decision-making processes at all levels. The Ugandan Constitution guarantees women a direct say in the legislative process by assigning them seats in the Ugandan Parliament (Muzee, 2023). Although the number of women in political office has increased since affirmative action was implemented, gender stereotypes and cultural norms still prevent women from assuming leadership positions (Chemutai & Mulyampiti, 2023). Lack of funding and strongly ingrained patriarchal ideas that support male leadership further limit women’s access to leadership roles in political parties and other public roles.Nigeria has seen notable advancements in the representation of women in politics, including female legislators, governors, and ministers. The Beijing Platform for Action and other international commitments have established a target for their representation, but it still falls short. Agbalajobi (2021) claims that institutional and cultural barriers that keep women from fully engaging in politics include intimidation, gender-based violence, and political parties’ preference for male candidates. The problem is made worse by the underfunding of women’s political campaigns. Quota systems and affirmative action, two policies that support gender equality in government, have not been successful in removing these obstacles (Adigun Yusuf, 2024).
The Global Legal Structure for Reforming Gender Policy
The global legal frameworks are essential for promoting gender equality and directing nations to enact laws, regulations, and policies that protect women’s rights. These frameworks hold nations responsible for their pledges and create a global consensus on what gender equality and women’s empowerment entail. Uganda and Nigeria have accepted a number of international agreements aiming at advancing gender equality, but they differ in terms of compliance and how well they are carried out. The main international frameworks that guide the reform of gender policy are listed below.
Often called the “international bill of rights for women,” the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is the cornerstone of international efforts to abolish gender discrimination (Gouri, 2021). Adopted by the UN in 1979, CEDAW requires member governments to take all necessary steps to end discrimination against women in all spheres of life, including public participation, work, education, and healthcare. Nigeria and Uganda have both signed CEDAW, pledging to respect its tenets. The degree to which these nations have integrated the provisions of CEDAW into their own legal frameworks differs, nevertheless. With the passage of the Equal Opportunities Commission Act (2007), which attempts to eliminate gender disparity in a number of areas, Uganda has achieved notable progress (Jackline, 2024). However, there are still difficulties in putting CEDAW’s tenets into reality. The effective implementation of CEDAW is nevertheless hampered by sociocultural norms and deeply ingrained gender prejudices, especially in rural areas where conventional gender roles predominate (Nalule, 2022). Although CEDAW’s goals are reflected in Nigeria’s National Gender Policy and other legislative frameworks, such the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (2015), gender discrimination is still widespread in both law and practice. The full implementation of CEDAW’s provisions is hampered, for example, by the non-ratification of the Violence Against Women Bill and the inconsistent application of gender-related laws among states.Twelve crucial areas of concern, including women’s health, education, economic empowerment, and political engagement, were identified in the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, which was endorsed during the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995 (Gondal et al., 2023). This proclamation highlights the necessity for nations to develop thorough and well-thought-out programs to tackle the difficulties women encounter in these domains. It also emphasises how crucial it is to create a social and legal climate that allows women to reach their full potential in all facets of life. Nigeria and Uganda have both committed to the Beijing Platform, but their execution of its objectives has been uneven. The government of Uganda has made some headway in expanding women’s access to healthcare and education. However, problems including high rates of maternal death, gender-based violence, and the lack of economic prospects for women in the unorganised sector continue to be major obstacles (Tetui et al., 2024).Nigeria’s gender-related policies, especially those aimed at increasing female political involvement, have been influenced by the Beijing Platform. One notable accomplishment is the employment of women to key administrative positions. However, cultural barriers, religious prohibitions, and deeply embedded patriarchal structures continue to limit women’s participation in politics and other decision-making processes (Alokwu, et al., 2024). Despite these challenges, programs like the National Policy on Women’s Empowerment aim to increase women’s responsibilities in the political and economic spheres.In order to solve global concerns and advance sustainable development by 2030, the United Nations established the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015. Goal 5, which emphasises gender equality and women’s empowerment, calls for the eradication of all forms of violence, discrimination, and harmful practices against women and girls while ensuring their full participation in public, political, and economic life. As signatories to the SDGs, Uganda and Nigeria have pledged to accomplish Goal 5 as well as other associated objectives such expanding women’s access to economic, healthcare, and educational opportunities (Jackline, 2024; Egberi & Madubueze, 2023). In Uganda, women’s political representation and literacy rates have significantly improved. The government has also started programs to promote women’s economic development and reduce maternal mortality. However, problems such limited financial resources, gender-based violence, and inadequate access to reproductive healthcare persist (Mambo et al., 2023).Nigeria, on the other hand, has made some progress toward SDG 5, particularly in the areas of female education. However, the country has serious issues like economic inequality that disproportionately impacts women, especially in the northern regions, gender-based violence, and cultural practices such child marriage (United Nations, 2020). Nigeria has committed to several international frameworks, including the SDGs, however implementation is patchy and monitoring systems are often insufficient.
Conclusion
The implementation, difficulties, and effects of international legal frameworks for gender reforms have been highlighted by this study’s analysis of the gender policy frameworks in Nigeria and Uganda. According to the study, both nations have made great progress in enacting gender policies that uphold women’s rights and advance equality, but they still have a long way to go before reaching complete gender parity. However, cultural resistance, a lack of funding, and insufficient institutional ability hinder the implementation of laws such as the Gender Policy and the Domestic Violence Act, as well as Uganda’s constitutional provisions of gender equality. Enforcing national gender laws such as the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act and the National Gender Policy is more difficult in Nigeria due to its ethnic, religious, and regional diversity. Although these laws seek to safeguard women from gender-based violence and advance their rights, their implementation varies by region, especially in places where cultural and religious traditions clash with the goals of gender equality.Stronger institutional backing, improved legal enforcement, and a cultural movement toward gender equality are all necessary for effective gender policy reform in both nations. To guarantee that women may fully utilise their rights and opportunities, there must also be consistent political will and sufficient resources for gender programs. Governments, the general public, and international partners must work together to foster an environment that supports women’s inclusion and empowerment in order to overcome these obstacles.
References
Ajah, B. O., Onyejegbu, D. C., Chinweze, U. C., Nwangwu, C., Nwonovo, O. S., Onoh, F. C., Ugwu, I. P., Onwe, D. P., & Egbo, D. D. (2025). Critical Assessment of Trial De Novo and Its Implications for Justice Delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Nation-building & Policy Studies (JoNPS), 9(1), 33-51.
Anierobi, C. M., Obasi, C. O., Obioha, E. E., Onyejegbu, D. C., & Ajah, B. O. (2025). Community land conflicts and pro-poor urban land access in Enugu, Nigeria: Church involvement for social inclusion. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 81(1), 1-11.
Emeka, J., Etobe, E. I., Aloye, O. L., John-Okpa, P. A., Ozoemena, I. C., Enweonwu, O. A., Ilo, K. O., Nwonovo, O. S., Aigbe, D. S., & Ajah, B. O. (2025). African Union and the Quest for Socio-Economic Emancipation in the Face of Xenophobia. Journal of African Union Studies (JoAUS), 14(2), 5-23.
Ajah, B. O. (2026). Cultural Syncretism and Crime: Exploring the Blending of Igbo Practices and Modern Criminality in Uganda. Journal of Somali Studies (JOSS), 13(1), 1- 25.
Ajah, B. O., & Magadze, T. O. (2026). State Failure and the Rise of Organised Crime: A Case Study of Governance Gaps in Nigeria. African Renaissance, 23(1), 123-144.
Ajah, B. O., & Magadze, T. O. (2026). Combating Transnational Crime: Evaluating the Role of ECOWAS in West African Security Architecture. An-Najah University Journal for Research – B Humanities, 40(2), 1-15.
Ajah, B. O., Onyejegbu, C. O., Isife, C. T., Enweonwu, O. A., Chinweze, C. C., Anyadike, N. K., Ilo, K. O., Omaliko, J. C., Asadu, N., Ugwu, C. C. O., Okemini, O. O., Leweanya, K. C., Ohabuenyi, J., Uzoigwe, O. U., Iloma, O., Madubuko, J. C., & Ngwu, G. E. (2026). Narrative accounts, feelings, and perceptions of yahoo-plus offenders in Enugu and Abakaliki correctional centers, Nigeria. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 84, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100823
Ajah, B.O., Akwaji, F. N., Ogenyi, F., Nwonovo O. S., Antai, G. O., Shigaba, D. G., Onyejegbu, D. C., Chinweze, U. C., & Ngwu, G. E. (2025). An Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Impact of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 on the Implementation of Restorative Justice Practices in Enugu State, Nigeria. African Journal of Law and Justice System (AJLJS), 4(2), 79-103.
Ajah, B. O., Obioha, E. E. Obioha, O. O., & Onyejegbu, D. C. (2025). The Cost of Insecurity: How Terrorism Shapes Africa’s Economic Relations with Global Powers. Journal of African Foreign Affairs (JoAFA), 12(2), 49-68.
Ajah, B. O., Morojele, R., Phokojoe, M., Thabane, S., Mundau, M., & Matele, M. J. (2025). Strengthening Nation-Building in Nigeria Through Gender-Inclusive Health and Crime Policies. Journal of Nation-building & Policy Studies (JoNPS), 9(2), 49-63.
Perbawa, K. S. L. P., Aidonojie, P. A., Ajah, B. O. (2025). Disability and electoral justice for inclusive participation. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues, 3(2), 221-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v3i2.93
Ajah, B. O., Akwaji, F. N., Ossai, A., Ajah, M. C., Uzoigwe, C. O., Damina, J. J., Ugwu, I. P., Nzewi, N. L., Chinweze, U. C. (2025). Potential strategies of using virtual and augmented realities in Nigeria’s conflict resolution and interfaith dialogue. African Journal of Religion, Philosophy and Culture (AJRPC), 6(2), 157-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-7644/2025/v6n2a9
Ajah, B.O., Okpa, J. T., Eneji, R. I., Morojele, R., Asomba, I. U., Nwonovo, O. S., Ajah, M. C., Igwe, O., & Nweke, I. O. (2025). Incorporating Igbo Dialects into the Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Inmates in Nigeria’s Correctional Centres. Journal of African Dialects and Literary Studies (JoALLS), 6(1), 5-12. DOI https://doi.org/10.31920/2633-2116/2025/v6n1a1
Ilo, K.O., Ekwok, I. C., U. T. O., Ajah, B. O., Uzoigwe, C. O., Omaliko, C. J., Ukam, P. I., & Isife, T. C. (2025). How a Digital Repository Platform Can Be Used In the Administration of Awaiting Trial Issues in Uganda. Journal of Somali Studies (JoSS), 12(1), 171-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31920/2056-5682/2025/v12n1a8
Ajah, B. O., Obioha, E.E., Thaban, S., & Ogbuke, M. U. (2025). Exploring the Place of 4ir in Preventing and Addressing Ethnoreligious Conflict in Nigeria. Parkistan Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.172.61.75
Onah, C. C., Chekwube, O. M., Okechukwu, E., Olorunfemi, G. C., Asogwa, ,M. O., Ejim, E. P., Ajah, B. O., Oluwasanmi, O. I. (2024). Poverty and human capital development: The role of politico-administrative factors in a failed/fragile state, Nigeria. Journal of Somali Studies (JoSS), 11(3), 69-94.
Antai, G. O., Ajah, B. O., Onyejegbu, D. C., Nwonovo, O. S., Enweonwu, O. A., & Agwano, D. E. (2024). An Examination of the African Response to International Crimes and Extradition vis-à-vis Inter-Regional Cooperation. African Journal of Law and Justice System (AJLJS), 3(2), 5-24.
Obasi C. O., Igbo, P., Onyenali, R., Enweonwu, O. A., Onyejegbu, D. C., Isife, C. T., Nwonovo, O. S., & Ajah, B. O. (2024). Religion and Legitimization of Violence in Nigeria: Towards Peace Education. African Journal of Religion, Philosophy and Culture (AJRPC), 5(2), 133-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-7644/2024/v5n2a8
Ajah, B. O., Ekwok, I. C., Akwaji, F. N., Onyejegbu, D. C., Nwonovo, O. S., Isife, C. T., Nwangwu, C. N., Agwanwo, D. E., & Umahi, O. T. (2024). Assessing the Role of the African Union in Addressing Democratic Recession in Africa. Journal of African Union Studies (JoAUS).
Osadebe, N. O., Ajah, B. O., Onyejegbu, D. C., Obumunaeme, I. K., Theresa, I. C., Chuwkuka, U. C., Ohabuenyi, J., & Ugwu, C. C. O. (2024). Incorporating virtual reality and augmented reality into the rehabilitation and re-empowerment of victims of Sudanese political unrest. African Renaissance (AR), 21(4), 437-456.
Onyejegbu, D. C., Ajah, B.O., Ekwok, I. C., Obisessan, O. O., Uzoigwe, C. O., Isife, C. T., Enweonwu, O. A., Okemini, O. O., & Eze, O. J. (2024). How Nollywood Can Facilitate Criminal Justice Responses to Herdsmen Issues in Nigeria. Journal of African films and Diaspora Studies (JAFDIS) (Research on African Films, Diaspora Studies, Performance Arts and Communication Studies), 7(3), 291-306.
Chinweze, U. C., Ajah, B. O., Osadebe, N. O., Isife, C. T., Umahi, O. T., Enweonwu, O. A., Ogbodo, C. S., Chukwuanu, S. C., Aladokiye, E. G. (2024).
Prospective Strategies for the use of Virtual and Augmented Realities by the Somali Criminal Justice System in Bringing Al-Shabab Terrorists to Justice. Journal of Somali Studies (JoSS), 11(2), 79-104.
Anierobi, C. M., Obasi, C. O., Nnamani, R. G., Ajah, B. O., Iloma, D. O., Efobi, K. O., Nwaoga, C., Asadu, N., Okonkwo, U. T., Chigbe, E. I. (2024). Communal conflicts in Nigeria: Assessment of the impacts on internally displaced persons and settlements amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 10(1), e30200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30200
Eze, O.J., Onyejegbu, D.C., Chinweze, U.C., Nwokedi, M., Ajah, B.O., & Obi, D.O (2023). Dark Figure: Traders’ Crime Reporting Behaviour in Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal of African films and Diaspora Studies (JAFDIS) (Research on African Films, Diaspora Studies, Performance Arts and Communication Studies), 6(4), 45-63.
Ugwuoke, C.O., *Ajah, B.O*., Akor, L., Ameh, S.O., Lanshima, C.A., Ngwu, C.E., Eze, U.A, & Nwokedi, M. (2023). Violent Crimes and Insecurity on Nigerian Highways: A Tale of Travelers’ Trauma, Nightmares and State Slumber. HELIYON, HLY_e20489
Asogwa, U., Ajah, B. O., Okpa, J. T., Ugwu, I. P., Nnamani, R. G., & Okorie, A. (2023). Examining the views and opinions of itinerary-traders on adherence to covid-19 lockdown in Enugu State, Nigeria. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s40647-023-00376-y
Ezeanya, O.C.P., Ajah, B. O., Okpa, J.T., Chinweze, U. C., Onyejegbu, D.C., Enweonwu, O. A., & Obiwulu, A. C. (2023). Elite complicity in the non-egalitarian structures, occasioning violence and anarchy in the Nigerian State. African Renaissance, 20(1), 77- 92.
Okpa, J.T., Ugwuoke, C.U., Ajah, O. B*., Eshioste, E., Igbe, J. E., Ajor, O.J., Ofem, N.O., Eteng, M.J., & Nnamani, R.G. (2022). Cyberspace, black-hat hacking and economic sustainability of corporate organizations in Cross-River State, Nigeria. SAGE OPEN. 10.1177/21582440221122739.
Okpa, J. T., Ajah, B. O., Nzeakor, O.F., Eshioste, E., & Abang, T.A. (2022). Business E-mail compromise scam, cyber victimisation and economic sustainability of corporate organisations in Nigeria. Security Journal, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-022- 00342-5
Iloma, D.O., Nnam, M. U., Effiong, J. E., Eteng, M. J., Okechukwu, G. P., & Ajah, B. O. (2022). Exploring socio-demographic factors, avoiding being a victim and fear of crime in a Nigerian university. Security Journal, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-022- 00336-3
Ajah, B. O., Chinweze, U.C., Ajah, A.I., Onyejegbu, D.C., Obiwulu, A., Onwuama, E.M., & Okpa, J. T. (2022). Behind bars but not sentenced: the role of computerized central repository in addressing awaiting-trial problems in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079822
Ajah, L.O., Ajah, M. I., Ajah, B. O., Onwe, E. O., Ozumba, B.C., Iyoke, C.A., & Nwankwo, T.C. (2022). A 20 Year retrospective review of rape pattern in Ebonyi State, South-East Nigeria. Heliyon, 8, e08894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08894
Ezeanya, O.C.P., Ajah, B. O., Ibenwa, C.N., Onuorah, C. & Eze, U. (2022). A critical analysis of the impact of religion on the Nigerian struggle for nationhood. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(4), a7225. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts. v78i4.7225.
Ajah, B. O., Nnam, M. U., Ajah, I. A., Idemili-Aronu, N., Chukwuemeka, O. D., & Agboti, C. I. (2021). Investigating the awareness of virtual and augmented realities as a criminal justice response to the plight of awaiting-trial inmates in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Crime, Law and Social Change, DOI:10.1007/s10611-021-09988-5.
Eze, O.J., Ajah, B. O., Nwonovo, O. S., & Atama, C.S. (2021). Health sector corruption and COVID-19 outbreak: evidence from Anambra and Enugu States, Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 40(1), 34-46. DOI:10.1080/02589001.2021.1921129
Nnam, M.U., Effiong, J.E., Iloma, D.O., Terfa, I.M., & Ajah, B. O. (2021). Hazardous drinking and the dark triad: an antidote for manipulative behaviour among students. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1-7.
Anthony, E.O., Obasi, C.O., Obi, D.O., Ajah, B. O., Okpan, O.S., Onyejegbu, C.D. et al., (2021). Exploring the reasons for perennial attacks on churches in Nigeria through the victims’ perspective. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(1), a6207.
Ezeanya, O. C. P. & Ajah, B. O. (2021). Addressing the biblical and ecclesial obligation of Nigerian Roman-Catholic priests in promotion of peace and social justice. HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, 77(4), a7138. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.7138
Nnamani, G. R., Ilo, K. O., Onyejegbu, D. C., Ajah, B. O., Onwuama, M. E., Obiwulu, A. C., & Nzeakor, O. F. (2021). Use of noncustodial measure and independent monitoring body as panacea to awaiting-trial problems in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 16(1), 51-63.
Ugwuoke, C. O., Ajah, B. O., & Onyejegbu, C. D. (2020). Developing patterns of violent crimes in Nigerian democratic transitions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53, 1-8.
Ajah, B. O., Ajah, A.I., & Obasi, C. O. (2020). Application of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in the investigation and trial of herdsmen terrorism in Nigeria. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 15(1), 1-20.
Okpa, J.T., Ajah, B. O., & Igbe, J. E. (2020). Rising trend of phishing attacks on corporate organisations in Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 14(2), 460–478.
Ajah, B. O., Dinne, C.E., & Salami, K. K. (2020). Terrorism in contemporary Nigerian society: conquest of Boko-Haram, myth or reality. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 15(1), 312-324.
Eze, O. J., Obi, D. O., & Ajah, B. O. (2020). Nigerian criminal justice system and victims of crime neglect in Enugu Urban. FWU Journal of Social Sciences 14(3), 41-53.
Ajah, B. O*, Uwakwe, E. E., Nwokeoma, B. N., Ugwuoke C. O., & Nnnamani, R. G. (2020). Ameliorating the plight of awaiting-trial inmates in ebonyi state, nigeria through reasonable bail condition. Pertanika Jounal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(4), 2897 – 2911.
Areh, C. E., Onwuama, E. M., & Ajah, B. O. (2020). Social consequences of wife-battering in Ogbaru and Onitsha North Local Government Areas of Anambra State, Nigeria. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 14(4), 80-92.
Ajah, B. O., & Okpa, J. T. (2019). Digitization as a solution to the problem of awaiting-trial inmates in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 14(2), 199–207.
Ajah, B. O., & Onyejegbu, D. C. (2019). Neo-economy and militating effects of Africa’s profile on cybercrime. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(2), 326–342.
Nnam, M. U., Ajah, B. O., Arua, C. C., Okechukwu, G., & Okorie, C. O. (2019). The war must be sustained: an integrated theoretical perspective of the cyberspace-Boko Haram terrorism nexus in Nigeria. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(2), 379–395.
Ajah, B. O. (2018). Educational training of inmates in Awka and Abakaliki prisons, Nigeria. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 13(2), 299–305.
Ajah, B. O., & Ugwuoke, C. O. (2018). Juvenile justice administration and child prisoners in Nigeria. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 13(2), 438–446.
Enweonwu, O. A., Ugwu, I. P., Onyejegbu, D. C., Areh, C. E., & Ajah, B. O. (2021). Religious fanaticism and changing patterns of violent Crime in Nigeria. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 1378–1389. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929- 4409.2021.10.158
Onyejegbu, D. C., Onwuama, E. M., Onah, C. I., Okpa, J. T., & Ajah, B. O. (2021). Special courts as Nigerian criminal justice response to the plight of awaiting trial inmates in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 1172- 1177. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.136
Nwadike, N. C., Okpa, J. T., Ofem, N. O., Ajah, B. O., Chinweze, U. C., & Isife, C. T. (2023). Socio-cultural practices and stress among working mothers of underage children in Nigeria Public Universities. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 15(3), 1-23.
Areh, C. E., Ajah, B. O., Ezeanya, O. C. P., Eze, A. U., Onwuchekwa, S. I., & Onyejegbu, C. D. (2021). The Troubling Epidemic of Wife-Battering in Ogbaru and Onitsha North Local Government Areas of Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 1349-1361.
Nzeakor, O. F., Nwokeoma, B. N., Hassan, I. M., Ajah, B. O., & Okpa, J. T. (2022). Emerging Trends in Cyber ends in Cybercrime A crime Awareness in Nigeria. International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime, 5(3), 41-67.
Onwuama, O. P., Ajah, O. B., Asadu, N., Ebimgbo, S. O., Odii, A., & Okpara, K. C (2019). Public perception of police performance in crimes control in Anambra state of Nigeria. African Journal of Law and Criminology, 9(1) 17-26.
Ajah, B. O., Eze, O. J., & Okpa, J. T. (2024). Reforming the Nigeria Criminal Justice System. Rowman & Littlefield.
Eze, O.J., *Ajah, B.O.*, Okpa, J.T., Ngwu, G. E. (2023). Ethnic-based violence: Nigeria perspectives. In: Martin, C., V. R. Preedy and V. B. Patel (Eds), Handbook of anger, aggression, and violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98711- 4_182-2
Eze, J.O., Okpa, J.T., Onyejegbu, C.D., & *Ajah, B. O*. (2022). Cybercrime: victims’ shock absorption mechanisms. UK: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.106818.
Alawari, B. M., & Ajah, O. B. (2017). Understanding the gender dimensions of cyberbullying among undergraduates in Nigeria. (A Book Chapter). Ahmadu Bello University Press Limited, Zaria.
Okpa, J. T., *Ajah, B. O*., Eze, O. J., & Enweonwu, O. A. (2022). Communal conflict and violence: Causes and impact. In C. Martin, V. R. Preedy and V. B. Patel (eds) Handbook of Anger, Aggression, and Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 98711-4_184-1
Eduindex 