Tag: current affairs

Insult Of Jadhav’s Family Is Insult Of India

Coming straight to the key point, I fully agree with senior and eminent Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad that, “Insult of Jadhav’s family is insult of more than 130 crore Indians”. The moot question is: Why do our leaders of all parties speak strong language against Pakistan but never take any tough action against them? How long we will keep drinking poison like Lord Shiv and keep tolerating everything cheerfully? We are not Lord Shiv nor can we ever dare to even dream to become like him! Also, we should not forget that Lord Shiv certainly drank poison but he never tolerated insult and had not spared even the father of his consort Parvati when he insulted him publicly!
                                           But leaders of India are crossing all tolerable limits. They may shout against Pakistan, they may scream against Pakistan, they may demand terming Pakistan as Aatankistan as they did just recently in UN but when it comes to taking action themselves directly on the ground, they are just not prepared to do anything substantial! The Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status to Pakistan was given unilaterally to them in 1996 even though they kept sending terrorists to India most actively since 1989 onwards and forced lakhs of Kashmiri Pandits and all those Muslim families who helped them to leave Kashmir and live like a refugee in their own country!
                                          Dr BR Ambedkar never favoured special status for Jammu and Kashmir which Jawaharlal Nehru did which was his worst blunder but what is more tragic is that no PM till now has ever dared to set right that historical blunder. Article 370 was not there in original Constitution but inserted later after Ambedkar’s death! Why is it there still in Constitution?
                                When we treat Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India then why have we not fully and finally merged it with India? Why as former CJI JS Khehar rightly pointed has separate flag, separate Constitution and separate laws when we treat as an integral part of India? This open sham must end now once and for all if we are really serious in treating as Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India!
                                      Coming back to the main issue, Kulbhushan Jadhav who was wrongly kidnapped from Iran border by Taliban and later sold to Pakistan’s ISI was termed a terrorist and when his mother and wife were keen to meet him, they were made to wait for nearly two years and then humiliated in the most shameful manner! Which self-respecting country will tolerate this quietly? Why India keeps taking things lying down? Why Pakistanis are given a VVIP treatment in India and allowed to dine and enjoy with whomever they like? Is this really fair? Yet shamelessly our politicians allow this to happen most brazenly right under our very nose!
                                         It is not Sanjeev Sirohi but Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar who disclosed to media after Kulbhushan Jadhav and his wife and mother – Chetna and Avanti returned to India along with Indian diplomat JP Singh who had accompanied them to meet Jadhav that, “Under the pretext of security precautions, the cultural and religious sensibilities of family members were disregarded. This included removal of mangalsutra, bangles and bindi, as well as a change in attire that was not warranted by security. For some inexplicable reason, despite her repeated requests, Chetana’s shoes were not returned to her after the meeting. We would caution against any mischievous intent in this regard.”
                                           What a national disgrace! If this thing were to happen with PM Modi’s family members or with even some Minister’s family members, would they still have given such muted response? Why do we tolerate so much everything quietly? Why can’t we pay back Pakistan in the same coin? This is the main reason why we are repeatedly subject to such insult time and again!
                                        Israel supports us but still we vote against them and reiterate our solidarity with Palestine! But see what Palestine does to us? Their leaders openly share platform with dreaded terror leaders like Hafiz Saeed who is leader of Lashkar-e-Taiba and reiterate their full support for Jammu and Kashmir’s integration with Pakistan at all cost and under all circumstances! Leaders like Farooq Abdullah don’t say a word when such shameful incidents happen but are quick to react otherwise at the drop of a hat and keep warning India against any measure to integrate them with India!
                                          Jadhav’s mother revealed that Jadhav kept on making tutored statement when she enquired him about the injuries. It was further revealed that Jadhav and his family were not allowed to speak in Marathi. Besides, the accompanying Indian diplomat Deputy High Commissioner JP Singh was initially separated from family members who were taken to the meeting without informing him. The Pakistani press was allowed to approach the family members closely, harass and hurl false accusations about Kulbhushan Jadhav. Kulbhushan and his mother were separated by a glass partition throughout the meeting.
                                      Indian leaders are squarely responsible for this! Why they lavishly throw dinners and parties for Pakistani leaders and invaders like General Musharraf who should not be allowed even an entry to India? Why they care a damn even when our soldiers are getting killed daily while fighting against their soldiers and terrorists trained and armed by their army and ISI?    
                                         At the very least, why can’t Centre revoke the unilateral MFN status conferred to them since 1996 thus disregarding the supreme sacrifices of our soldiers? Why can’t Centre declare Pakistan as a terror state instead of just demanding it once in a year in a UN platform or any other platform? Why can’t Centre expel all unnecessary Pakistani former diplomats fishing in troubled waters in India like Mehmood Kasuri?
                                          Why can’t Centre nuke all relations with Pakistan till they start behaving with us properly? Why can’t Centre revoke all benefits wrongly given to Pakistan under the Indus Water Treaty agreement signed with them in 1960? Why can’t Centre expel all Pakistani nationals from India like Kuwait did as they foment trouble and terror wherever they go?
                                             It is because politicians and not Pakistan are the real danger to India because they are ready to tolerate everything and compromise on everything! Justice Markandey Katju termed Pakistan and Bangladesh as fake countries who were created by Indian politicians. Jinnah himself said to a boy long time back “No my boy, you are an Indian first and then a Muslim!” The creation of Pakistan was an act of treachery and we are still suffering because of it! Even Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan who was a Pakhtoonistan leader said, “What is this Nehru? You have made me a foreigner in my own country? What sense does it make?”
                                       Seventy years down the lane nothing has changed. Still politicians keep appeasing separatists and keep appointing interlocutors to engage them even as they collude with Pakistan and regularly get funds from them to bleed India and cut it by a thousand wounds! What difference does it make to our politicians?
                                        What an unbeatable irony that those who are so senior politicians with exceptional academic background and even coming from royal families and served themselves in elite services hail Pakistan invader Gen Musharraf as “Musharraf Sahab” and terror leader like Hafiz Saeed as “Hafiz Sahab”! Are they peons and chaprasis of Musharraf and Hafiz or are they engaged as servants by them? If not then why do they indulge in so much of servility? Are they getting some pay from them? Then why so much of chamchagiri?
                                   Kulbhushan Jadhav is an ex servicemen and an officer who served in the Navy! Why India tolerates his insult so quietly? India must react very strongly and our politicians must start behaving themselves if India is to gain its pride and prestige in the international forum!
                                       But most shockingly politicians never learn anything even after facing repeated terror attacks from Pakistan and this alone explains why many feel that, “Fear politicians and not Pakistan! What is Pakistan? Nothing but a fake country created by politicians of India in collusion with England who formerly ruled over us!”
                                      Justice Markandey Katju went to the extent of calling politicians as “rogues and scoundrels”. It is high time and politicians must salvage their ever sinking reputation by really acting tough against Pakistan as Subramanium Swamy advocates but he is not listened to even in his own party that is BJP! The day our politicians start acting tough against Pakistan it dare not take us for granted! It will start to behave itself! But the moot question is: When will politicians make that day to come? It is all in their hands alone!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkehra,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Govt Mulls Lifer For Repeat Offenders For Human Trafficking

Coming straight to the key issue, it is a matter of great satisfaction to learn that the government is now all set to introduce a new law to guard against human trafficking. It has proposed a 10-year punishment for those engaging in “aggravated forms of trafficking” while seeking life imprisonment for repeat offenders. Trafficking any person just for the sake of earning extra cash and thus ruining the entire life of that person  is a completely unpardonable offence which must invite the strictest of punishment. Even death penalty will not be too harsh and must be used as long as this death penalty itself is not abolished!
                                         To be sure, this landmark Bill which has been proposed to identify various forms of trafficking, including for the purposes of bonded labour, sexual exploitation, pornography, removal of organs and begging, has proposed severe punishment for those engaging in the heinous crime. Very rightly so! No leniency is warranted under any circumstances for such despicable and ghoulish crimes!
                                       To put things in perspective, the Trafficking of Persons (Prevention, Protection and Rehabilitation) Bill 2017, initiated by the Women & Child Development Ministry, is currently with a Group of Ministers (GoM) that will take a final view on the matter. The draft Bill was released in May 2016. The Bill proposes the establishment of a national anti-trafficking bureau, which shall be entrusted with the gamut of issues aimed at controlling and tackling the menace under various forms. These include coordination, monitoring and surveillance of illegal movement of persons and their prevention.    
                                             It is noteworthy that the national anti-trafficking bureau will also be entrusted with increasing cooperation and coordination with authorities concerned with organisations in foreign countries for strengthening operational and long-term intelligence for investigation of trafficking cases, and driving in mutual legal assistance. This will certainly go a long way in ensuring that trafficking cases don’t go on unchecked and those involved in it are prosecuted and punished according to the law of the land! There can be no denying it.
                                   Let me bring out here that while listing out the ‘aggravated forms of trafficking’, the Bill speaks about offences such as bonded labour, by using violence, intimidation, inducement, promise of payment of money, deception or coercion. It also mentions trafficking after administering any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or alcohol, or for the purpose of marriage or under the pretext of marriage. The aggravated form also includes trafficking for begging or forcing those who are mentally ill or are pregnant.
                                           No doubt, such aggravated forms of trafficking must invite the strictest punishment. Even lifer is not enough. It must invite death. No person can be allowed to indulge in trafficking of any person and then escape with just lifer! This is just not done under any circumstances!
                                         Let me also bring out here that this Bill proposes specifically that, “Whoever commits the offence of aggravated form of trafficking of a person shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 10 years, but which may extend to life imprisonment.” For repeat offenders, it suggests imprisonment for life “which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life”, apart from a fine that will not be less than Rs 2 lakh. I very strongly feel that for repeat offenders the punishment should be mandatory death penalty and fine should not be less than Rs five lakh.
                                             While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me also inform them that as per data released by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), human trafficking numbers rose by almost 20% in 2016 against the previous year. NCRB said there were 8,132 human trafficking cases in 2016 against 6,877 in 2015, with the highest number of cases reported in West Bengal (44% of cases), followed by Rajasthan (17%). How can all this be allowed to go unchecked and unpunished? This alone explains why this Bill proposes stringent punishment for those indulging in human trafficking!
                                        For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that of the 15,379 victims who were caught in trafficking, 10,150 were female and 5,229 males. NCRB revealed that the purpose of trafficking included forced labour, sexual exploitation for prostitution; other forms of sexual exploitation; domestic servitude; forced marriage; child pornography; begging; drug peddling; and removal of organs. It is widely believed that the numbers recorded by NCRB are a far cry to actual incidences of trafficking as many cases went unreported with many people still unaware of the crime or lacking faith and confidence in seeking police help.
                                    As it turned out, for those engaging in ‘buying or selling’ a person, the Bill proposes rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than seven years which can be extended to 10 years with a fine upwards of Rs 1 lakh. It must be pointed out that the Bill also seeks punishment for those engaging in trafficking with the help of media, including print, internet, digital or electronic. It stipulates a punishment of not less than seven years which can extend up to 10 years and a fine of not less than Rs 1 lakh.
                                       It is also pertinent to mention here that it is provided explicitly that, “Whoever distributes or sells or stores, in any form in any electronic or printed form showing incidence of sexual exploitation, sexual assault or rape for the purpose of extortion or for coercion of the victim or his/her family members, or for unlawful gain, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but may extend to seven years.”
                                             Truth be told, apart from the national bureau, the proposed Bill also aims at having state-level anti-trafficking officers who shall also provide relief and rehabilitation services through district units and other civil society organisations. The Bill also spells out measures towards relief and rehabilitation for the victims of trafficking. This is really commendable!
                                         What I like most about this proposed Bill is that in a sharp departure from the past, it does not treat a trafficked person as an offender but a victim. It has to be noted with deep regret that the existing laws do not take this laudable approach and instead most atrociously and unfairly treats both the trafficked person and the trafficker as criminals which under any circumstances can never be justified!  
                                         Be it noted, the Bill mandates that the constitution of District Anti-Trafficking Committee for every district. This Committee will perform various functions pertaining to the prevention, rescue, protection, psychological assistance etc of the victims. There will also be a State Anti Trafficking Committee to oversee the implementation of the law and advise the state government on matters pertaining to the prevention of trafficking and protection/rehabilitation of victims. A Central Anti-Trafficking Advisory Board will perform similar functions at the Union level.
                                                It cannot be lost on us that the Bill also takes into account various aspects of trafficking and the punishments as defined in Sections 370 to 373 of the Indian Penal Code. It also cannot be ignored that the Bill also aims to include other offences which are not dealt with in other laws for the purpose of trafficking, such as punishment for disclosing the identity of the victim, using narcotics/alcohol for the purpose of trafficking etc. The Bill stipulates mandatory reporting within 24 hours by a police officer, public servant, any officer/employee of protection homes or special homes having custody of the victim to the District Anti-Trafficking Committee or in case of child victim to the Child Welfare Committee.   
                                             Let me hasten to add here that a separate chapter on offences and the penalties is also a part of the Bill. It seeks to establish special courts in each district of the country and simultaneously also ensure that special prosecutors are appointed to fast-track the trials and increase prosecution. It also envisages the creation of a fund for rehabilitation of victims of trafficking.
                              It would certainly not amount to an exaggeration to say that the earlier this landmark proposed Bill is passed, the better it shall be in the interests of those who are trafficked and their families because it is they who are ultimately the worst affected in the whole process. Once this landmark Bill is finally approved by the Cabinet after giving it the requisite thoughtful consideration, it will then be tabled in Parliament where MPs of different parties would be free to give their valuable suggestions and then it will be referred to the Select Committee before being taken up for debate and getting it passed!
                                       It merits no reiteration that the menace of human trafficking has acquired serious proportions in last few decades. It has to be addressed on a war footing. This certainly entails strict punishment for offenders indulging in human trafficking and strictest punishment for repeated offenders! The Bill must be promptly enacted into a law and implemented swiftly and strictly to ensure that those indulging in it reap the consequences of their heinous acts and don’t escape lightly!
                                 All said and done, human trafficking is the worst form of crime for which there can be no justification. Those indulging in it must be awarded not just life term but death penalty also especially repeated offenders! Only then will a right, strong and clear message go out to all those indulging in it that they will have to face either life term or death penalty and also would have to pay a very heavy penalty not less than Rs 5 lakh for daring to indulge in it!
                                           It brooks no more delay and the punishment prescribed must be enhanced significantly especially in case of repeated offenders much more as I have spelt out so that those indulging in it are made to pay through their nose! Only then will it go a long way in serving as an effective deterrent in discouraging potential offenders from indulging in it! Hope so!              
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,

Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.   

BCI Mulls Ban On Practice By Lawmakers

Coming straight to the nub of the crucial matter, let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost pointing out that it has been very rightly demanded by some eminent lawyers, activists and leaders in a letter written to the Bar Council of India (BCI) that those lawyers who become MPs and MLAs should be stopped from practising. The main ground on which they are demanding that the MPs and MLAs should be stopped from practicing is that they are drawing salary just like in any other profession. Then why should they be allowed to practice?
                                 More specifically, let me reveal here that a prominent BJP leader has requested the Bar Council of India to debar MPs and MLAs from practicing as advocates, saying that it was against the spirit of BCI rules which require advocates not to be engaged in any full-time trade, business, occupation or profession. There can be no denying or disputing it! The earlier this is done, the better it shall be in the long term interests of the legal profession which must have full time lawyers and not part time lawyers!
                                       Elaborating further, let me also reveal here that in a letter written to the BCI Chairman – Manan Kumar Mishra, the Delhi BJP leader Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya who is also an advocate stated clearly and categorically that the practice of lawmakers doubling up as advocates also went directly against the Supreme Court’s landmark verdict in Dr Haniraj L Chulani v Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa (1996). In this landmark verdict it was held that, “Legal profession requires full time attention and would not countenance an Advocate riding two or more horses at a time”. This merits prompt and positive response.
                                     It is heartening to note that the BCI has also taken serious note of it. This alone explains that why a high powered Committee constituted by it would deliberate and decide this all-important issue in next three days! Before deciding, it will certainly go into all aspects and consider each issue in detail!    
                                      Truth be told, the letter – a copy of which has also been sent to CJI Dipak Misra cited BCI rules to list out restrictions on MPs and MLAs on taking up any employment and sought to highlight that those working with the executive and the judiciary were not allowed to practice as advocates. Upadhyaya who had pointed out this glaring anomaly has termed it a violation of right to equality and right to non-discrimination guaranteed under Article 14 and 15 of the Constitution. Absolutely right!
                                  It would be pertinent to mention here that it has been noticed that several MPs and MLAs appeared as advocates during Parliament and Legislative Assembly sessions, which was not only immoral and unethical but also in violation of Rule 49 of BCI Rules. Upadhyaya wrote in his nine-page long letter dated December 18 that, “A legislator enjoys better salary, allowance and post-retirement benefits than members of executive and judiciary. It is an honourable and fulltime profession but does not remain noble merely by calling it as such, unless he is dedicated for welfare of people. Legislators are expected to put fulltime service to public and their constituents ahead of their personal interests. Nobility of the profession of law also has to be preserved and protected. Therefore, provisions of the Advocates Act and BCI rules must be given effect in letter and spirit to maintain clean and efficient Bar to serve the cause of justice.”  
                           To put things in perspective, according to BCI Rule 49 those who are drawing salary in any field are not entitled to practice as a lawyer. BCI Rule 49 reads as follows: “An Advocate shall not be a full-time salaried employee of any person, Government, firm, corporation or concern, so long as he continues to practice, and shall, on taking up any employment, intimate the fact to the Bar Council on whose roll his name appears, and shall thereupon cease to practice as an Advocate so long as he continues in such employment”.  The BCI will decide on this key issue in next three days. A high powered Committee has been constituted to look into this entire matter after a meeting held on this key issue decided on the same.
                                      Be it noted, BCI Chairman and senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra said that, “The three-member panel is examining the provisions of the Advocates Act and the Bar Council of India Rules in this respect. They will file their report in the next few days.” Ashwini Upadhyay who filed the petition contended that MPs and MLAs draw their salaries from the Consolidated Fund of India, hence, are “employees of the state”. Upadhyay also submitted before the BCI that, “Under Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, MLAs and MPs are public servants. Hence, allowing them to practice as an advocate and restricting other public servants is arbitrary, irrational and violation of Articles 14-15 of the Constitution.”
                                            It is also noteworthy that Ashwini contended that it amounted to “professional misconduct” that MLAs and MPs who get salary and other benefits from the public fund, appear against the government. Some of these lawmakers even hold corporate retainer-ships. He also rightly submitted that, “They appear against the State to defend their lawbreaker clients in the Court of Law, which is the matter of conflict of interest.” The petition which Ashwini submitted also pointed out that while an advocate should be fully dedicated to his profession, legislators are also expected “to dedicate their fulltime to public and their constituents ahead of their personal and financial interests.”
                                         While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that among the members of the Committee are DP Dhall, RG Shah and BC Thakur. According to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, MPs and MLAs come under the category of public servants. In such circumstances, it is considered highly inappropriate that MPs and MLAs are allowed to still practice while other public servants are explicitly barred from doing so! The plea submitted by Ashwini very rightly submitted that the lawmakers – Members of Parliament and Members of the State Assemblies should be banned from doubling up as practising advocates, saying they are salaried public servants and cannot ride two horses at the same time.
                                          Isn’t this the worst case of hypocrisy, double standards and discrimination of the highest order? If this is not, then what else is? This has been allowed to happen since last more than 70 years but anyway it is better to be late than never. It must now be set right!
                                           Why MPs and MLAs are given relaxation everywhere? Why are they treated as above others? Why are the same rules not applied to them like others?
                                     They are many such grey areas and what is most unfortunate is that everywhere it is MPs and MLAs who have been given the long rope! No person can get any government job even if someone maliciously files a false case in any police station but to become an MP or an MLA even if you have many cases pending against you like late Phoolan Devi you can still freely contest elections! All such highly discriminatory practices must be thrown in the dustbin of history!
                                        Why MPs and MLAs alone have the unfettered right to increase manifold their salary without being checked by anyone when even Judges have no such similar rights? Why MPs and MLAs can fight elections even from jail? Why MPs and MLAs alone enjoy so many colonial privileges like providing many of them whomever the government of the day likes with the highest security at taxpayers cost? Why should they not be abolished?
                                             It still remains to be seen what the high powered Committee recommends on this. But I am quite certain that it will henceforth explicitly bar MPs and MLAs from practising and put a full stop to this entire controversy! It needs no rocket scientist to conclude that when BCI Rule 49 explicitly bars salaried class from practicing then why should MPs and MLAs be treated on a different parameter and exempted from the same when they not just get huge salary but also lots of other benefits like housing, vehicles, pension and a lot more!        
                                           All said and done, this should have been done a lot earlier probably right after independence. But seventy years down the lane we see still nothing being done till now in this direction. But again like a true optimist I would say that it is better to be late than never!
                                         It cannot be denied that a good beginning has been made by the Bar Council of India in this direction after getting complaints from leaders, lawyers and others. Let us hope that in the next three days we would see some decisive action on this. It is highly inappropriate that MPs and MLAs who don’t get time for even talking are allowed to continue as lawyers for namesake only!
                                    This must be discarded and I am  cent percent sure that now this will be done soon! A uniform policy must be framed to restrict the public servants, people’s representatives and members of the judiciary to practice other professions in violation of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution and such conflict of interest must be treated as criminal misconduct to check what has been going on unabashedly since last more than 70 years in our country!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Why Should Adultery Be Treated As Crime?

It is most astonishing to see that the colonial era law of adultery made in Britishers era is still flourishing with no real change being made in it. Many feel that women should also be punished as now she too stands on par with women, gets educated in best of institutions and gets the best of job and yet has no qualms  at all to indulge in adultery. They point out that in Jammu and Kashmir also both men and women are equally punishable then why not the same be applied all over India?
                                        To say the least, this is ridiculous argument and in the era of globalization we too must flow with the wind and appreciate that if something wrong is happening in Jammu and Kashmir then by the same token that cannot be extended to all other states as well! Two wrongs cannot make a right and where it is written that if once a wrong is done then it can’t be corrected? The adultery law in Jammu and Kashmir also must be amended to meet the present circumstances!
                                           It would be pertinent to mention here that many countries have decriminalized adultery and even England which ruled over us and made adultery punishable in India have also decriminalized adultery a long time back. Why can’t it then be now decriminalized in India also? It can certainly be decriminalized and it must be done forthwith!
                                     How can it be ignored conveniently that in 2012, a United Nations Working Group on laws that discriminate against women wanted countries that treat adultery as a crime, to repeal such laws? Is it not the duty of each of the countries who are members of UN which includes India who is a founder member to abide by it? Why can’t such an archaic and highly discriminatory law which most unfairly and unabashedly discriminates between men and women be promptly repealed?
                                                                        There can be no gainsaying the indisputable fact that a reconsideration of the law on adultery is not just long overdue but also it being decriminalized is most crucial!  This law of adultery which is right now before the Supreme Court has to pronounce now on the all important question which is an open question as to whether this Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code  really discriminates against men just on the basis of gender and gives not just an unconstitutional exemption to women but also abets her to indulge in it freely as she is not punishable at all under any circumstances! Is this really fair?
                                          To put things in perspective, while agreeing to issue notice to the government, the Bench has observed that the provision is archaic. It has also went further to observe that in a case of adultery, one person is liable for the offence but the other is absolved, and that the concept of gender neutrality, on which criminal law normally proceeds, is absent. The Apex Court has also noted that once the consent or connivance of the husband is established, there is no offence of adultery at all.
                                           Going forward, the Apex Court deems it as subordination of a woman and something that “creates a dent on the independent identity of a woman”. It is so shocking to see that a woman under the present law of the penal code is treated as a subordinate woman who cannot complaint of her husband indulging in adultery and also who can never be considered fit of giving consent! Why can a women be punished for theft, cheating etc but not for adultery? Why only the husband alone has the unfettered to prosecute an outsider for adultery?
                                             Most importantly, why should the offence of adultery be punished as a crime at all? Why can’t two adults who are consenting and willing be allowed to do what they want to do? Why should they be jailed for it?
                                         Why can’t India also like its former colonial ruler – UK decriminalize adultery and allow two consenting adults to do what they want to do? Why can’t India follow so many other countries who have all decriminalized adultery as they consider it to be no offence at all? Why can’t it be treated as their private affair?  
                                          Why burden courts with such useless case which is already overburdened with a huge backlog of pending cases thus consuming the precious time of the courts which can be utilised for pursuing other serious crimes like rape, gang rape, murder etc? Why do we disregard the irrefutable truth that it is one thing for adultery to be treated as a ground for divorce which is a civil proceeding and quite another for it to be made a basis for incarceration which is the most foolish thing that can be ever done which alone explains that why even UK has decriminalized it? When UK can do it then why can’t we do it?
                                          When so many other countries can do it then why can’t we too do similarly? Are we waiting to be the last country in the world to decriminalize adultery? We must introspect seriously!
                                        In a nutshell, criminalizing adultery cannot be justified under any circumstances. Every adult person must have the right to live a life of his/her choice! Why criminalize it? There can be no ground to justify it!
                                         Why punish those who are having sex with consent? Why can’t we come out of our medieval mindset? Why treat woman as “inferior person” who just does not understand anything when she decides to have sex with any men of her choice?
                                             Why put restrictions on women to have sex with any men of her choice? Why can’t it be left to the men and women to do what they want to do in their personal life as long as the sex is not rape? Why punish sex with consent?
                                               On a parting note, let me say this very clearly and categorically that law makers must step in and immediately decriminalize adultery as we see in so many other countries! We are living in a modern and progressive world. Why then should we follow British era rules and laws notwithstanding the irrefutable fact that even Britishers have decriminalized adultery in their own country?
                                   Why then can’t we also decriminalize it accordingly to meet the present circumstances? It is never too late! We must all understand this fundamental truth fully well! Most of all, Centre must act suitably and waste no time further in amending the law of adultery to meet the present circumstances by decriminalizing it accordingly!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.       

Lawyers Lead The Health & Wellness Vacation Trend

A new trend that can be observed is more and more people, and especially lawyers in seems, are packing their bags and heading for healthy holidays instead of the usual binge vacations where more beer is drank than water. This new trend can be observed by the number of fitness and weight loss retreats like this great one and many more in Bali, Thailand, India, and even in places like Mexico. They are capitalising on the fact that health and wellness is now the commonly held value of the majority of the population. It is especially clear in the educated populous, which is likely why we are seeing so many lawyers attending!

Lawyers Lead The Health & Wellness Vacation Trend

 In India there is an upward trend of both people attending this style of health holiday, and also new locations in tourist destinations such as Goa and Kerala where they are setting up new retreats to cater for the masses who wish to heal and lose weight. The one we attended in Bali was absolutely fantastic. It was compiled in three parts including a full detoxification to first cleanse the mind and body and allowing it to clear and heal before starting the training section of the program. The detoxification was possibly the highlight for us and for many others who accompanied us on the program, we felt so clean and pure after completing the cleanse and it set up perfect to lead into the remainder of the program where we really lost a lot of weight. Overall are experience was phenomenal and we can definitely see this trend continuing both lawyers and everyone else who cares about their health!

SC Dumps Draconian PMLA Clause Denying Bail

In a major relief to thousands of undertrials, the Supreme Court on November 23, 2017 very rightly struck down a draconian provision which can deny a person bail even if there is reasonable ground to believe that he or she did not commit the offence of money laundering. We are living in a democratic country in which every person has the right to live a free life. The State has no right to deny any person the right to live a free life on the slightest pretext just on the suspicion of having committed the offence of money laundering.
                                              Noting that the history of bail practices traces back to the Magna Carta, the Apex Court declared the draconian Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002 violative of the fundamental rights to equality, life and personal liberty guaranteed under the Constitution. How can then it be allowed to continue? This alone explains why Supreme Court has very rightly dumped the draconian Section 45(1) of the PMLA which arbitrarily denies bail without any reasonable grounds whatsoever! There can be no denying this!   
                                        While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that a Bench of Justices Rohinton Nariman and SK Kaul, in their judgment, passed a general direction to courts to take up thousands of cases of undertrials who have been languishing in prisons, unable to get bail, because they did not satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45(1) of the PMLA. By all accounts, this is a landmark order which will benefit thousands of undertrials who will thus be set free and live a normal live just like all others! It certainly deserves unqualified appreciation because if this order had not been passed, many undertrials especially those who are poor would have continued to languish in jail for a long time!
                                            For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that a Bench of Justices RF Nariman and Sanjay Kishan Kaul held Section 45(1) arbitrary and unjust because it allowed a Judge to deny bail to an accused charged with an offence that is punishable with more than three years in prison. It was held that, “We declare Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in so far as it imposes two further conditions for release on bail, to be unconstitutional as it violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India”. As per Section 45(1), an accused could get bail only after the public prosecutor is given an opportunity to oppose the application and if the court is satisfied that the person is neither guilty of the alleged offence nor likely to commit the crime again on his or her release. Secondly, the court should reasonably believe that he is not guilty of the “predicate” offence for which he received the laundered money as proceeds of the crime. The Apex Court set aside all orders by which bail to an accused was denied due to the twin conditions and directed that such cases be remanded back to the respective courts to be heard on merits.
                                        Going forward, let me also reveal here that “predicate” offences include a range of crimes from 26 different laws from waging war against the Government of India to offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Indian Penal Code to Wildlife Protection Act, Prevention of Corruption Act, Child Labour Law, etc. The Modi government had stoutly defended the stringent conditions on the ground that it was an attempt by the Parliament to get back the black money siphoned off from the economy. But the Apex Court held explicitly that the law leads to “manifestly arbitrary and unjust results and, therefore, violates Articles 14 (right to equality) and 21 (right to liberty) of the Constitution.” Justice RF Nariman, who authored the verdict, said Section 45(1) was violative of Article 14.
                                       Truth be told, the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment came on a clutch of petitions challenging the validity of Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It must be noted here that the petitioners in the case had moved the top court after they were denied bail following the twin conditions. The petitioners argued that they were wrongly denied bail.
                                         As it turned out, the Apex Court gave them the liberty to approach the trial court afresh and said their bail petitions should be heard and decided expeditiously thus bringing a fresh smile on their face. It must be recalled here that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was introduced to make money laundering an offence and to attach property involved in money laundering. It was aimed to adequately deal with the serious threat to the financial system of India.
                                        To put things in perspective, though the PMLA Act was passed by the Parliament in 2002, it was brought into force only in August 2005. Thus, in other words, it started functioning only from August 2005. It must be borne  in mind that the Scheduled offences defined in PMLA comprise various offences, including some under Indian Penal Code, anti-drug law, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act, Wildlife (Protection) Act, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, Prevention of Corruption Act and Antiquities and Arts Treasures Act.
                                             Be it noted, it was argued before the top court by the petitioners that the two conditions made grant of bail virtually impossible in money laundering cases. Also, to satisfy them the accused will have to disclose their defence at a point in time when they are unable to do so. On its part the government urged the top court not to strike down the provision but read it down to make it constitutional.
                                                     However, the government’s argument was not accepted by the top court, which rightly said the provision had no rational relation with the grant of bail for the offence of money laundering. The two-Judge Bench of Apex Court pointed out a glaring anomaly pertaining to the bail provisions. Such stringent conditions of bail being granted only if the court is convinced that the accused is not guilty are not applicable when someone applies for anticipatory bail to prevent being taken into custody for charges of money laundering and what is worse is that once arrested, his sliver of hope of his/her chances of getting bail shall stand banished!
                                 In hindsight, the Apex Court, while hearing a batch of petitions and appeals challenging the constitutional validity of Section 45 of PMLA termed it as a “drastic provision” which turns on its head the presumption of innocence which is fundamental to a person accused of any offence. It also said that, “Before applying such a Section which makes ‘drastic inroads’ into the fundamental right of a personal liberty under Article 21, we must be doubly sure that such provision furthers a compelling state interest for tackling serious crime.” It further went on to say that, “Without any such compelling state interest, the indiscriminate application of the provisions of Section 45 will certainly violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Provisions akin to Section 45 have only been upheld on the ground that there is a compelling state interest in tackling crimes of an extremely heinous nature. Merely ‘reading down’ the two conditions would not get rid of the ‘vice of manifest arbitrariness and discrimination’.”
                                      Needless to say, the Apex Court also very rightly pointed to one of the anomalies in Section 45 and said that anticipatory bail could be granted to a person who is prosecuted for the offence of money laundering which may last throughout the trial of the case against him. It said if the person is arrested for the offence of money laundering, then in order to seek regular bail, Section 45 will apply, which was an anomalous situation. So it had to be set right which was done!
                                     So, on a concluding note, it can well be rightly said that this landmark judgment validates what once legendary and most learned Judge of Supreme Court of India – Justice VR Krishna Iyer once famously said in a case that, “Bail shall be the rule and jail shall be the exception”! It must be welcomed with both hands by one and all! It will certainly ensure that thousands of undertrials don’t keep languishing in jail just because of this draconian PMLA clause Section 45(1) which has rightly been dumped by the highest court of India and are able to lead a normal life just like all other countryfellows! There is no reason why this landmark judgment should be not appreciated in most grandiloquent terms!  
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Judges Taking Over Executive Power Violates Lakshman Rekha: Jaitley

Let me begin at the very beginning by pointing out that while crossing swords with the judiciary, the government on November 25 questioned judicial activism and criticized the “trend” of courts appointing retired Judges to head Committees and wondered aloud how Judges would feel if other organs stepped in to do their job. The government certainly has a valid point. As for instance, we saw how the Supreme Court stepped in to decide whether it was correct to send back those thousands of Rohingyas refugees who had illegally crossed over to India following the persecution they faced in Myanmar.
                                            If Government feels that they are a potential threat to the national security and must be sent back that should be final. Judiciary must refrain from stepping in an area which exclusively belongs to the executive. We all know how our national security gets compromised as it had been in the past when we allowed crores of Bangladeshis to illegally stay back in India even after their country got independence from Pakistan! Why should India allow Rohingyas to go and settle in Jammu and Kashmir from where Kashmiri Hindus and those Indian Muslims sympathetic to them were forcibly evicted and compelled to live as refugees in their own country! Why no voice is raised for them? Do they don’t have human rights?
                                       Why is it being treated so casually that Rohingyas entering India and being transported not to some other state close to Myanmar so that they can be deported easily when things calm down but to such sensitive places like Jammu and Kashmir which is directly attacked by Pakistan time and again which can never be good for the national security? Why should Supreme Court even think about allowing them to stay there after PIL is filed in their favour? How can human rights of foreigners who have nothing to do with India be bigger than our paramount national interests? How can it be ignored that many Rohingyas had killed about 100 Hindus and burnt their houses before fleeing to India and have links with dreaded terror organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba? How can Hafiz Saeed’s open call to Rohingyas to kill Indians be ignored while they are in India?
                                             To put things in perspective, while leading the charge was Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, who, addressing a session at the National Law Day function said that, “I have often heard an argument that judicial activism is born out of a phenomenon that other institutions are not doing their job, somebody has to fill the gap. It’s a flawed argument. It is flawed because if any organ of the state is not doing its duty, it can be directed to do its duty. Usurpation of power…by any other organ would never be the correct constitutional approach. What if the same argument was used the other way round against the judiciary? Arrears were pending, judges are not doing their job. So must somebody step in and now exercise that power? The answer is no…And therefore, it’s extremely important that the dividing line on separation of powers is maintained. And therefore, by creating arguments, the thin dividing line itself cannot be lost. Once it is lost, there is no limitation on which area it will go into.”
                                               What Arun Jaitley has said must be treated with utmost respect because he is not just any other Minister or Finance Minister who in the past has also handled Law Ministry but he was also one of the most revered senior lawyer of Supreme Court who even represented Central Government on many occasions till a few years back before ultimately plunging himself fully into politics and becoming a Minister! He thinks a lot before speaking anything and is not the sort of person who would say anything just to remain in news! This alone explains why Centre has very rightly handed him the key Finance portfolio and even the Defence portfolio has also been handled by him apart from Law!    
                                         Be it noted, the session, titled ‘Judicial Review and Parliamentary Democracy – Balancing the Separation of Powers’, was organized by the Law Commission of India and Niti Aayog. Calling for caution while exercising judicial review, Jaitley said, “While exercising the power of judicial review, one has to bear in mind that separation of powers is maintained in its entirety. The executive is not trained to exercise either legislative or judicial power. Parliament is not trained or really an institution to exercise judicial power. Judiciary is similarly not trained nor does it have that administrative maturity of exercising legislative power. In fact, if judiciary gets into the process of exercising executive or legislative power, directly or implicitly, the very institution of judicial review itself will suffer.” Judiciary must always bear this in mind what Jaitley has said!
                       It also must be borne in mind that Jaitley went on to talk of the “latest trend” of courts appointing “retired judges” to various committees to discharge executive functions. He said that, “Also this…new trend…alright, I don’t exercise the power myself (but) I will appoint my nominee to exercise the executive power, the nominees may be equally unsuitable to exercise the executive power because they have not been trained. Retired judges have been trained to write judgments…not to run sports organisations…Therefore this temptation of taking over executive power and exercising it yourself or through your nominees clearly violates the Lakshman Rekha (of separation of powers).”
                                     The moot question that arises here is: Why when judiciary exercises so much restraint that it has never till date ever ordered the creation of a single bench of high court in any part of India even though it is a judicial function and it understands the implications fully well of creating a bench in far off places due to which people have to face so many unnecessary inconveniences , it has never so ordered and always left it to the government to decide! The people of Uttarakhand from 1947 to 2000 till it became a separate state had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way to Allahabad to attend court hearings as there was no bench there but only one single bench had been created way back on July 1 in 1948 for such a big state like UP and that too in Lucknow which is just about 150 km away from Allahabad but Supreme Court never stepped in to save people from the huge inconvenience of travelling so far to Allahabad! Even now people of West UP about more than 9 crore of about 26 districts are compelled to travel all the way to Allahabad which ais about 700-800 km away from all these districts and benches and high courts of 8 states are nearer to West UP as compared to Allahabad still Supreme Court never stepped in!
                           As if this was no enough, Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge – Justice Jaswant Singh had recommended 3 benches of high courts to be created for West UP and hilly areas (now Uttarakhand) at Agra, Nainital and Dehradun but not a single bench was created even though on its order a bench was created at Aurangabad in Maharashtra, Jalpaiguri in West Bengal and Madurai in Tamil Nadu! Yet Supreme Cout never said a word on it! In 2012, Centre created 2 more high court benches for Karnataka which already had a bench at Hubli for just 4 and 8 districts at Dharwad and Gulbarga but not a single bench for more than double of the districts – 26 of West UP yet Supreme Court never said a word on this! The 230th report of Law Commission had recommended creation of more high court benches in big states in 2009 buit Centre implemented it only in Karnataka which till now remains the only big and sole beneficiary of it yet Supreme Court did not say a word on it!
                                 This despite the fact that Ban ki Moon who was UN Secretary General had slammed UP and not Karnataka as “rape and crime capital of India” and maximum pending cases are in UP about 10 lakhs and in Karntaka it is less than 2 lakhs yet it was awarded 2 more benches but Supreme Court said nothing! West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases of UP as was testified by Justice Jaswant Commission yet Supreme Court never ordered creation of a bench here! Even former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee demanded creation of a bench in Parliament but again Supreme Court kept aloof! It is no secret that maximum crime, maximum killings alkl take place in West UP yet it has no bench and UP tops the number of killings list of states and Bihar comes second yet UP has least benches in India and Bihar has none whereas peaceful states like Maharashtra, Karnataka and Assam have either 3 or 4 benches yet Supreme Court never stepped in even though it comes under its purview!
                               Truth be told, the lawyers of West UP have gone several times on strike as for instance for 6 months from July to December 2001, for 3 to 4 months in 2014-15 and have been striking work for more than 36 years every Saturday from May 1981 to December 2017 and is still continuing but judiciary has never stepped in to resolve this vexed issue! It has always chosen to kept aloof! Why has it never intervened for such a long time?
                                Truly speaking, the people of West UP who are litigants are compelled to travel whole night more than 700-800 km all the way to Allahabad without reservations many times and face many other inconveniences but judiciary never intervened! Why? When it can exercise itself restraint on this count where so many people have to face so many inconveniences which is a talking point everywhere especially in West UP then why can’t it act similarly in other cases also?
                               Warning that there would be no limits if the “Lakshman Rekha” is crossed, Jaitley said, “You probably (will) have a court saying where security forces are to be deployed is something which I will decide…” He added that if every high court were to decide on where security forces are to be deployed, for instance, “it’s an invitation to anarchy.” The Kolkata High Court had in October stayed the Centre’s move to withdraw Central forces from Darjeeling and Kalimpong districts, where they had been deployed during the recent Gorkhaland protests. This was subsequently lifted by the Supreme Court.
                           It has to be borne in mind that in his inaugural address, President Ram Nath Kovind who earlier has himself practised inm Delhi High Court and Supreme Court too touched upon the need for sepration of powers between the judiciary, legislature and executive, saying, “They need to be careful not to cross into each other’s defined spaces or give the opportunity to read transgressions where none is intended. This can occur in many circumstances. For instance, when extraneous comments and obiter dicta come to dominate public debates, crowding out of substantive understanding and deliberation of a well thought out judgment.”
                          It also cannot be lost upon us that earlier, addressing the inaugural session, CJI Dipak Misra asserted that judiciary was duty bound to stand with citizens if other organs of state encroached on their fundamnetal rights. He said that, “The fulcrum of governance – let it be legislature, let it be judicary, let it be executive – is that the citizens have been guaranteed fundamental rights and the governing entities are not expected to encroach upon it. The moment thery encroach upin it or there is an apprehension there shall be encroachment, the judicary is obliged to stand by them.”
                                   It is also of immense significance that the CJI sought to allay fears of judicial activism but stressed that it was the job of the courts to interpret government policies. He said that, “There is a perception that there is judicial activism. I must clarify. Protection of fundamental rights of each and every citizen is trhe sacrosanct duty of the judiciary which has been conferred on it by the Constitution. Fundamental rights have been expanded from the date the Constitution came into existence. Expansion of fundamental rights is done by the process of interpretation…Nobody intends, nobody has the desire to enter upon policy making areas. We don’t make policies, we interpret policies and that’s our job.” He has a point!
                                  Well said but again I must ask: Why Supreme Court has never ordered the creation of more high court benches in big states like UP and Bihar which are notorious for their lawlessness when even Union Cabinet Ministers like former Satyapal Singh have in past demanded the creation of 5 more benches at Meerut, Agra, Jhansi, Gorakhpur and Varanasi and considering the indisputable fact that Allahabad High Court is oldest in India completing its 150 years in 2016 and is biggest court in whole of Asia yet has least benches in India! All high courts come under the jurisdiction of Supreme Court still why has it never taken any action on this score?
                                 Why UP sends maximum MPs, maximum MLAs and maximum elected representatives and has maximum population more than that of Pakistan still has least benches and why when even Justice Jaswant Commission recommended creation of bench here in Agra was not a bench created here? Why Supreme Court till now has chosen to look the other way? Why has it never shown any activism in this regard not just in UP but for any other state as well? Why can’t it exercise such restraint in other areas also? It is high time and some serious introspection must be done and it must be always rememebred that “Even Judges are not infallible”! A good rapport is needed between executive, legislature and judiciary for running the country smoothly and clashes must be avoided by paying heed to what Arun Jaitley has said so elegantly! This is what our nation needs now!   
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Strike By Lawyers Of West UP Every Saturday For 36 Years Is Most Concerning

To begin with, it is no ordinary matter that the lawyers of West UP have been on strike every Saturday since May 1981 to protest against denying West UP even a single bench of high court even though the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission had recommended the setting up of a high court bench at Agra apart from Nainital and Dehradun which are now in Uttarakhand but not a single bench was created anywhere. On the contrary, Centre took just no time to create a high court bench at Aurangabad in Maharashtra in 1985 on the recommendations of the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission as also at Madurai in Tamil Nadu and Jalpaiguri in West Bengal! It was then that the lawyers of West UP decided to set up a Central Action Committee to pursue the most sacred and legitimate demand for a high court bench by fighting for it relentlessly till it reaches its logical conclusion.  
                                    It needs no rocket scientist to conclude that it is the “poorest of the poor” people among the more than 9 crore people of all religions, castes, communities and sexes without any discrimination whatsoever who will stand to gain the maximum if a high court bench is created in West UP! What is the problem then in creating a high court bench for more than 9 crore people living in 26 districts of West UP in 2018 when a high court bench for Lucknow for just 12 districts was created way back in 1948 on July 1? Why even after 70 years is Centre not prepared to create a high court bench in West  UP even though the people are compelled to travel for about 700-800 km whole night all the way to Allahabad as there is no bench here and have to spend huge money for staying, lodging and other expenses? Why can’t all this be avoided by setting up a high court bench in West UP or by attaching 26 districts of West UP with Delhi High Court which is so nearby?
                                             Why the high court and benches of 8 states and above all even Lahore high court in Pakistan is nearer to West UP as compared to Allahabad? Why the lawyers of West UP were compelled to go on strike for 6 months from July to December 2001 demanding the creation of a high court bench in West UP yet no action taken? Can anyone in Centre even dream as to how the lawyers managed to strike for so long thereby depriving themselves from livelihood for full 6 months and how they struggled to meet their daily end yet no bench created?
                                      Even in 2014-15, the lawyers of West UP went on strike for 3 to 4 months and even boycotted Lok Adalats and protested whole night outside the court but again Centre just gave empty assurances but nothing materialized on ground! Even in 2009, the lawyers of West UP went on strike and even called a bandh in whole of West UP to protest the decision to not create a single bench here! Even in 2010, the lawyers of West UP went on strike for a month demanding bench.
                                                      Most recently, the lawyers of West UP went on strike for a week from 14 October to protest against the Governor of West Bengal Kesarinath Tripathi being accorded a guest honour in CCSU and while staging peaceful protest, many senior and eminent lawyers among others got injured badly, the most prominent being Chaudhary Narendrapal Singh, OP Sharma, MP Sharma and Vinod Rana among others as Kesarinath Tripathi had opposed the creation of a bench in West UP in 1995-96 when Mayawati wanted the same to be done and had infamously said that, “Creation of a bench in West UP will be over my dead body”. Why this hatred for West UP? Have people of West UP ever opposed the creation of just one bench for whole of UP in Lucknow which is just 150 km away from Allahabad where high court itself is located? If Lucknow is capital then so are Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Dehradun and Thiruvananthapuram among others?   
                                      Why a high court bench at Port Blair for just 3 lakh people, a high court for just 6 lakh people of Sikkim, for just few lakhs of people of people in Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura as also in many other smaller states? Why a high court now for Uttarakhand since 2000 for just 88 lakh people but not even a bench for more than 9 crore people of West UP? Why such a raw and third rated treatment for them?
                                             Recently, President, PM and Chief Justice of India among others wished the nation on “Constitution Day” and everyone reiterated the dire need to make justice accessible to poor people! But I fail to understand why since last 70 years a single bench has been denied to West UP thus compelling people to travel without any reason so far to Allahabad to get justice? Why when 230th report of Law Commission recommended creation of more high court benches was it not implemented in big states like UP and Bihar which top in the crime rate, murder rate and still UP has just one bench and Bihar has no bench even though Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad is from Bihar? Why more than half of pending cases from West UP as acknowledged even by Justice Jaswant Commission yet no bench created here?       
                                         Why for a peaceful state like Karnataka 2 more benches were approved in 2012 at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts even though a bench existed at Hubli even though the pending cases are less than 2 lakh and that of UP stands at more than 10 lakh pending cases? Similarly why many other states like Maharashtra and Assam have 3 and 4 benches but for UP which has maximum population more than 22 crore as CM Yogi Adityananth keeps boasting still has least benches in India inspite of having maximum pending cases in high court about 10 lakh and more than 58 lakh in lower courts?
                                          Why maximum MPs, maximum MLAs, maximum villages more than 1 lakh whereas in other states the number is not more than few thousands at the most, maximum districts, maximum crime etc all in UP yet least benches here? Why former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon slams UP as “crime and rape capital of India” still we see least benches here and here too West UP which accounts for maximum crime has least benches? Why even leaders of BJP as also other parties are repeatedly killed by criminals without any fear and crime rate is exceeding so much that even foreign tourists are not spared as we saw a Swiss couple beaten up badly in Agra still no bench here? Why even 100 year old woman is raped by criminals without any fear still no bench here?
                               Why Centre does not have pity on more than 9 crore people of West UP in whose support lawyers have been waging agitating for a bench since independence and which has intensified since 1981 when lawyers decided to strike every Saturday and make sure that no lawyer does any work on this day and unitedly demand the creation of a bench here? Why lawyers even started striking many times even on Wednesdays yet Centre took no notice? Why even Atal Bihari Vajpayee demanded bench for West UP inside Parliament yet no action?
                                         Why all Union Ministers, MPs and MLAs have unitedly demanded creation of a bench here yet no action? Why for 36 years lawyers of West UP have been striking which should find entry even in Guiness Book of World Records for most period of strike still no bench is being created here? Why in 1955 the then UP CM Sampoornanand had demanded the creation of a bench in Meerut but Centre didn’t agree even though Lucknow had a bench since 1948?
                                             Why this stupidity that the people of Uttarakhand had to travel thousands of kilometers as it had no bench and for more than 50 years were compelled to travel all the way to Allahabad as a single bench was created at Lucknow in 1948? Why bench was not approved for any other place? Why even after 70 years nothing has been done to remedy this grave injustice? Why inspite of population of West UP being more than any other state except Maharashtra and Bihar and here too areawise Bihar with 94000 square km is smaller than West UP with 98000 square km still it has no bench?
                                    Why inspite of repeated assurances by successive governments in Centre was nothing done to fulfil it? With what face is Centre denying a bench even now when Amit Shah who is BJP national President and Rajnath Singh who is Union Home Minister had repeatedly assured that a bench would be created once NDA comes to power in Centre and in UP? Why Centre feels that even if lawyers of West UP strike for 100 more years nothing will change?
                                      Why only lip service of “speedy justice”, “justice to be made accessible to the poor” and “justice at doorsteps” if no step is taken to create a bench in West UP where incidents of crime are touching dizzying heights? Why Centre fails to appreciate that lawyers of West UP striking since such a long time for 36 long years every Saturday and regularly holding meetings after meetings to chalk out new strategy to push forward the surge of creating a bench can be resolved only by creating a bench here in any of the 26 districts wherever Centre wishes to do so? Is it such a big deal?
                                       Should it not be done immediately? It is the litigants who will stand to gain and here too it is the “poorest of poor” who will benefit most if a bench is created here and all strikes every Saturdayand sometimes even on Wednesday and sometimes for 6 months in a row will become a matter of past! Does Centre not wishes this happens?
                                              Why then it refuses to take any action on this score? Why is Centre not taking some action to ensure that this more than 36 year old strike by lawyers of West UP is brought to an end by mutual deliberations, discussions and decisions? Why is decision on this score being postponed inordinately when a bench was created at Lucknow in 1948, in Dharwad and Gumbarga for just 4 and 8 districts and in many other places even though the law and order situation is worse in West UP as compared to any other place for which benches were approved? Why can’t Centre stop coughing preposterous excuses and create a bench in West UP by which more than 9 crore people will gain in equal measure?
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.    

Can Convicted Politicians Head Political Parties?

It must be said at the very beginning that there can be no two opinions about the indisputable fact that in India a lot of cleaning is required in political parties because politics has become quite a murky affairs as anyone can not just enter politics but even head political parties inspite of being convicted. It is also unquestionable that political parties are most reluctant to do anything on this score and let us not live in a fools paradise by hoping that their stand would change somehow in the coming years. So, it needs no rocket scientist to conclude that Supreme Court must step in and bar convicted politicians or even politicians who have serious criminal charges against them from heading any political party or from even being a member of it.
                                        While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me also inform them that the Supreme Court on December 1, 2017 sought the responses from the Centre and the Election Commission on a plea seeking to restrain convicted persons from forming political parties and becoming their office-bearers for the period they are disqualified under the election law. Can convicted politicians who incur disqualification to run for elections, head political parties? This question will now be dealt by the Supreme Court after a public interest litigation (PIL) suggested that political parties headed by convicted persons should be derecognized by the Election Commission.
                                             For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that a Bench of Apex Court comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra, Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud sought the response of the Centre and Election Commission in this regard.  This Bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra while asking whether the court could stop a person from propagating his political views, agreed to examine the Constitutional validity of Section 29A of the 1951 Representation of the People Act (RPA) which deals with the power of the poll panel to register a political party. The Court clarified that it was only dealing with the question whether the power of Election Commission to recognize political parties under Section 29A of the Representation of Peoples Act 1951 will also carry with it the power to derecognise such political outfits headed by convicted netas.  
                                                Needless to say, if an order is passed banning convicted netas, it is bound to take within its fold the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) whose chief Lalu Prasad is a convicted person and he will be worst affected by it. The fate of another important leader Sasikala, who claims to be the political heir to Jayalalithaa and who would have become Chief Minister if she was not convicted for corruption in a disproportionate assets case will also hinge on the outcome of this petition as she is presently in jail. Without getting personal, let me mince no words in stating unequivocally and unambiguously that all convicted politicians must be barred entirely not just from heading parties but also from being associated with politics in any manner as they are just not fit for it.
                                      Let me be upfront in saying: The real problem in India is that there are no parameters for politicians. Are politicians coming from some different planet? If not then why are they treated with kidgloves?
                                 Let me also be upfront in saying: Even for getting a very small job one has to be a minimum graduate nowadays but for becoming an MP or MLA or for heading a political party there is no such minimum educational qualification which is a huge mockery and an open travesty of justice which must be set right without forwarding any excuse of any kind! Why there is a proper police verification for getting any job no matter how small it may be but for becoming an MP or MLA, you can like Phoolan Devi indulge in mass murders or any other crime and yet no one can stop you from taking oath not just as an MP or MLA but also as Ministers and slam the charges as “politically motivated”! Why any person cannot vote from jail but contest elections from jail? Why are those who are in jail allowed to contest from jail?
                                          It is also worth asking: For how long will our democratic system be held hostage to such criminals and for how long will they be given a long rope? Why only politicians alone for whom the standards of recruitment must be comparatively much higher than other professions because they have a share in every pie and exercise untrammelled power in every field are given relaxations everywhere and are allowed to hold the entire system to hostage and make an open mockery of our democratic system? Why can’t politicians be also made accountable like others? Why politicians like Vijay Mallya who is a former Rajya Sabha MP are allowed to take huge loan of more than Rs 9000 crore and then allowed to flee India and enjoy luxurious live in London in UK with that money which is taxpayers hard earned money? Why special treatment for them alone?
                                               Be it noted, senior advocate Siddharth Luthra who is appearing for the petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay submitted that convicted politicians are barred from contesting elections but they indirectly call the shots by heading a political party and hold posts in them. He said rightly that if a person on conviction in a criminal case was barred from contesting elections, it would be incongruent to allow such person to form or head a political outfit. The plea said convicted politicians, who are barred from contesting elections, can still run political parties and hold posts in them, besides deciding as to who will become a lawmaker.
                                      Not stopping here, the plea has sought a ban on convicted persons from forming a political party and becoming office bearers for the period they are disqualified under the election laws. It has sought a direction to declare Section 29A of the Representation of the Peoples Act 1951 as “arbitrary, irrational and ultra-vires” to the Constitution and to authorize the poll panel to register and de-register political parties.
                                               Why should convicted netas have a say in deciding as to who should become a law maker? Why should they not be barred from heading political parties also? Why no action till now in this regard?
                                  Truth be told, the PIL sought framing of guidelines to decriminalize the electoral system and ensure inner-party democracy as proposed by the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC). The petition very rightly said that currently, even a person who has been convicted for heinous crimes like murder, rape, smuggling, money laundering, loot, sedition, or dacoity, can form a political party and become its president or office bearers. The petition named several top political leaders who have been convicted or have charges framed against them and were holding top political posts and “wielding political power”.
                                     Going forward, it said the proliferation of political parties has become a major concern as Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, allows a small group of people to form a political party by making a very simple declaration. “Presently about 20 percent of registered political parties contest election and remaining 80 percent parties create excessive load on electoral system and public money,” the plea said and rightly sought the implementation of the 1990 Goswami Committee on electoral reforms. The plea also claimed that in 2004, the poll panel had proposed amendment to Section 29A, authorizing it to issue apt orders regulating the registration or de-registration of political parties.
                                            It is noteworthy that senior lawyers Siddharth Luthra and Sajan Poovayya informed the Bench that under the statutory schemes, the poll panel was empowered to register political parties but it lacked the authority under the Representation of the Peoples Act 1951 to deregister them. But the Bench while not giving a final order on this and fixing the plea for hearing after six weeks hastened to ask that, “Can a court restrain a convicted person from forming a political party? Can you stop a man from propagating his political views? It would be against the freedom of speech and expression to debar a convicted person from propagating political views through a party”.
                                    With due respect to Supreme Court, I would like to ask: Why are candidates barred from any government job if even their name is falsely dragged in by their rivals? Why only politicians alone are given the long rope? Why is it conveniently ignored that it is politicians who are running this country and therefore there must be highest standards for them in all respects otherwise we will continue seeing MPs and MLAs bunking session even when important Bills are being presented and not just this but also throwing papers on Speaker and using filthy language in court and resorting to all sorts of uncivilized acts?
                                       Why can’t they also be treated like others? Why recognition of political parties is not cancelled when their supporters indulge in wanton violence and destruction of public and private property and why are they not compelled to pay for all the damage inflicted by them or their supporters with their active blessings? Why even after raping and killing are they shown undue leniency but applicants for all government jobs are not shown any such kind of leniency?
                                           Which job can be bigger and more prestigious than that of politicians who become MPs, MLAs, Ministers, Chief Ministers and even Prime Minister? Still why no strict parameters for them? It is high time and this must change now. The earlier this is done, the better it shall be for the healthy functioning of our democratic system because it is politicians and politicians alone who are the bedrock of democracy and exercise control in every sphere in our country! Can anyone dispute this also?
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.   

Karnataka Assembly Passes Anti-Superstition Bill

To begin with, it must be appreciated that the ruling Congress Government in poll bound Karnataka has finally on November 16, 2017 got the controversial “Anti-Superstition Bill” passed unanimously in the ongoing winter session of the Karnataka State Assembly to eradicate evil practices with some minor amendments. It is largely based on the Maharashtra model. The much-delayed, much-hyped and hotly debated “Karnataka Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices and Black Magic Bill, 2017” which is popularly known as the “Anti-Superstition Bill has finally been passed by the State Assembly by a voice vote.  
                                      It may be recalled here that this Anti-Superstition Bill was earlier cleared by the Karnataka Cabinet on September 27. The Bill has exempted stamping of mudras on the body which is a practice in the upper caste community (Madhwa Brahmins), but advertisements that offer miracle cures for diseases have been banned. The Bill bans “Vashikarna” which is an occult practice of subjugation and also bans performing Vashikarana or advertising about it.
                                 Truly speaking, a Cabinet meeting which was presided over by Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah cleared the Bill to protect people against evil and sinister practices and to combat and eradicate inhuman, evil and sinister practices propagated/performed in the name of the “supernatural” or “black magic”. Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister TB Jayachandra told the media after the Cabinet meeting that the Bill proposes to ban ‘made snana’, which is practiced at Kukke Subrahmanya temple in Dakshina Kannada district in violation of human dignity.     
                                  Be it noted, Janata Dal (S) President HD Kumaraswamy requested that the Government ban the practice of conducting poojas in Government offices. He has a valid point. This will certainly minimize superstition to some extent and this is exactly what is the basic aim of the Anti-Superstition Bill that has been passed recently.
                                    While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that performing any black magic, inhumane act and evil practices in search of treasure or bounty, tantric acts which include physical and sexual assault will be banned as per the Bill. Rituals of exorcism, assaulting people under the pretext of exorcism, misinformation and creating a panic-like situation under the pretext of ghosts and black magic comes under the purview of the Bill. Very rightly so!  
                        It also gives me immense satisfaction to note that not everything is banned under this Anti-Superstition Bill. Any form of worship including pradakshine, yatra, parikrama at any religious shrines, harikatha, keerthana, pravachana, bhajans do not come under the purview of the Bill. It is also noteworthy that providing knowledge of ancient arts and practices, speaking about miracles performed by deceased saints and literature on them offering prayers, upasana, religious rituals at places of worship or at people’s homes, religious celebrations, festivals, processions, piercing of ears and nose, shaving of head, astrology and vaastu are considered acceptable under the Bill.
                                For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that among other things, it seeks to ban the controversial ‘made snana’ ritual (where devotees roll over plantain leaves with leftover food) in public/religious places. It primarily seeks to protect people against evil and sinister practices and combat inhuman and sinister practices propagated/performed in the name of “supernatural” or “black magic”. In all, 16 practices  are banned under the legislation.   
                                      It needs no rocket scientist to conclude that organizing macabre and bizarre rituals, offering magical cures which is just not practically possible and threatening people with dire consequences as for instance incurring the peril of divine or supernatural displeasure are also covered by this law. It is very sad to note that some people are condemning it without even understanding it properly or knowing even the ABC of this highly commendable law which deserves to be implemented not just in Karnataka but all over the country as a whole. We all know how people are made fool by many of those who have made it their open loot in the name of God. So I am very happy to note that Karnataka Government has made some commendable effort to check this which has to be lauded without any “ifs” and “buts”.        
                                         It also must be appreciated that this Anti-Superstition Bill of Karnataka has tried to draw a distinction between religious traditions and superstitious practices. It has borrowed some features from Maharashtra’s law also against black magic and other evil practices. Those who term this Anti-Superstition Bill of Karnataka as violating the right to practice and propagate one’s religion under Article 25 of the Constitution are way off the mark because certainly reasonable restrictions can be placed on the right to practice and propagate one’s religion which under no circumstances can be “unfettered and unlimited”.   
                                      Truth be told, we all keep seeing for ourselves so many times reports of most bizarre rituals being carried out openly right under the nose of the administration without facing any restrictions whatsoever. It must be reiterated that among the rituals, this Anti Superstition Bill outlaws explicitly the ‘urulu seve’ which is also known as ‘made snana’, in which devotees roll over food leftovers, the irrational practice of walking on fire, branding children and piercing one’s tongue or cheeks, human sacrifices, pelting stones in the name of sorcery (banamathi, mata-mantra), claiming to perform surgery with fingers, or claiming to change the sex of foetus in the womb and worst of all, ‘betthale seve’, where women are paraded naked as also sexual exploitation by invoking supernatural powers. This is most shocking!
                             What is wrong in outlawing such not just irrational practices but also dangerous and harmful practices by which those practicing it are harming themselves the most as also their very own children whom they profess to love the most yet foolishly indulge in such bizarre practices which should have no place in any civilized society under any circumstances whatsoever as they are completely inhuman and most exploitative carried out by those who exploit innocent and illiterate people for their own petty vested interests? In other words, no time should be wasted by all states in emulating Karnataka’s worthy Anti-Superstition Bill so that millions of innocent people are saved from being duped, harmed and exploited in the worst possible manner! The earlier this is done, the better it shall be in the supreme interests of millions of ordinary people in the longer term who are very easily fooled by those running business in the name of superstition who must be jailed and penalized heavily so that it acts as a “potential deterrent” to refrain from indulging in such abhorrent practices!  
                              On a concluding note, Karnataka State Government certainly deserves all the applauds and appreciation for having dared to bring in such a commendable Anti-Superstition Bill at the risk of antagonizing many illiterate voters who believe blindly in all such superstitions but this alone is not enough. All States must emulate it and further make more improvements wherever possible! It must be followed by many awareness campaigns so that people are educated properly on this score. Unless this is done on a war footing and on a mammoth scale just a tough law alone won’t act as a potential deterrent and people will continue to be fooled by those “spineless crooks” who believe in running their own shops at the expense of ordinary people!   
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Poor People Will Gain Maximum From More High Court Benches

Let me start by wishing my countrymen the very best wishes on this day that is 26th November on which day our Constitution was prepared after years of relentless toil. This alone explains why 26th November is celebrated as “Law Day” and “Constitution Day”. Our Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Ram Nath Kovind, Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra among others have very rightly expressed their best wishes on this auspicious day!
                                    It was rightly reiterated that the best tribute to our Constitution and its makers is to make justice more accessible to the poor. How better can it be done by setting up more high court benches especially in big states like UP, Rajasthan, Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar among other states ? This has been reiterated even by 230th report of Law Commission which recommended the setting up of more high court benches in states.
                                       But what an unbeatable irony that only one state that is Karnataka has stood to gain by it because after this report was submitted in 2009, it is only in Karnataka that two more high court benches were set up for just 4 and 8 districts at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively in 2012 even though the number of pending cases in high court is less than 2 lakh in whole of Karnataka whereas in UP which tops the states list among pending cases has more than 10 lakh pending cases and the cases from West UP alone are more than half of the total pending cases that is 5 lakh still we see that there is just one high court bench in Lucknow which is just about 200 km away from Allahabad created way back in 1948 on July 1 and after that not a single bench was created in any part of the state!
                                      What is even worse is that Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by Justice Jaswant Singh who is a former Judge of the Supreme Court was appointed by Central Government of former PM late Mrs Indira Gandhi to recommend at which all places high court benches were needed most. It recommended 3 high court benches for UP at Agra which is in West UP, Nainital and Dehradun which are now both in Uttarakhand but then were in UP but not a single high court bench was allowed to be created in UP and the people of Uttarakhand were compelled to travel thousands of kilometers all the way to Allahabad to get justice for which they had to bear unbearable expenses and waste many days travelling all the way to Allahabad. The net result was they became very agitated in demanding a separate state for themselves and we saw how Centre which refused to set up even a single high court bench there was compelled to set up a high court in Nainital!
                              Let me be direct in asking: Why when on the recommendations of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission a high court bench was created in Auranagabad in Maharashtra, Jalpaiguri in West Bengal and Madurai in Tamil Nadu then why not a single bench for UP even though 3 benches were recommended for it? Why Centre allowed the people of Uttarakhand to become agitated by not setting up a single high court bench there? Why Centre cared the least also for West UP which alone accounts for more than 57% pending cases as was acknowledged by Justice Jaswant Commission itself due to which it recommended creation of high court bench here?
                                       Let me also be direct in asking: Why inspite of lawyers of West UP striking work every Saturday since May 1981 till now that is more than 36 years to protest West UP not being given a single high court bench here even though Justice Jaswant Singh Commission had recommended creation of 3 benches has Centre failed to create even a single more high court bench here? Why lawyers of West UP went on strike not for one month or two months but for more than 6 months in 2001 and for 3 months in 2014-15 and for one month in 2010 and many times strike even on Wednesdays yet Centre just kept assuring the lawyers of West UP that a high court bench would be set up soon was no bench created here?    
                                          Bluntly put: Why Andaman and Nicobar islands with just about 3 lakh population has high court bench at Port Blair but West UP with more than 9 crore population which is more than any other state except Bihar, Maharashtra and UP of which it is itself a part has not even a single high court bench? Why many other small states like Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura having population of just 14 lakh, 18 lakh and 24 lakh has high court since last few years and bench since many decades but West UP with more than 9 crore population has not even a single high court bench? Why for just 88 lakh people of Uttarakhand was a high court itself approved in 2000 when it was given statehood but for more than 9 crore people of West UP not a single high court bench approved even 18 years later in 2018?
                                       Why the more than 9 crore people of West UP have been compelled to travel all the way to Allahabad about 700-800 km away to attend court hearings as no high court bench has been created here in any of the 26 districts of West UP who are all unitedly demanding the creation of a high court bench and lawyers of all these districts have even created Central Action Committee to pursue the legitimate demand for a high court bench here since 1981? Why Sampoornanand as CM had recommended a high court bench in Meerut  way back in 1955 but even in 2018 no bench has been created here? Why Mayawati as UP CM had recommended the creation of a West UP as a separate state to be named Harit Pradesh way back in 1995 but still not a bench created here?
                              Is this not a violation of Article 14 of Constitution which talks about equality? Why talk about just West UP alone? Even in Bundelkhand, Western part of Odisha and many other parts in different states we see that people have to suffer all types of inconveniences because their region has no high court bench! Why the 230th report of Law Commission was not implemented in all these needy places?
                                   It is futile to talk about speedy justice as long as more than 9 crore people of West UP are made to travel more than 800-900 km away all the way to Allahabad to get justice! This alone explains why former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee as Leader of Oppositon had himself demanded the creation of a high court bench in West UP in 1986! One can understand that Vajpayee as PM could not create bench here because he didn’t had majority but what about Narendra Modi who enjoys brute majority not just in Centre but also in UP for which US President Donald Trump had even congratulated him especially? Yogi Adityanath as MP had raised demand for a bench for Gorakhpur which is his constituency in 1998 but 20 years later as UP CM he will celebrate 1 year of his completion in office but he is unable to create a sngle bench there leave alone West UP!      
                                   We see that maximum crime, maximum riots, maximum killings all take place in West UP still there is not even a single high court bench here! When a high court bench can be created in Lucknow in 1948 then why not a single bench in West UP 70 years later in 2018? Is this fair justice? Is this equality that both high court and a single bench are in Eastern UP at Allahabad and Lucknow so close to each other? If Lucknow is capital then so are Bhopal, Dehradun, Bhubaneshwar, Thiruvananthapuram not capitals? Then why no high court or bench in these places?  
                                         I fully appreciate the Lok Adalats and other steps like video conferencing to reduce the pending cases but they alone are simply not enough!  Government has just no other option but to set up more high court benches in all those places where needed. Former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon had himself castigated the law and order situation in UP and slammed it as “rape and crime capital” of India yet Centre is not ready to  set up more high court benches here!
                                   Maximum MPs, maximum MLAs and maximum elected representatives are all from UP still it has just 1 high court bench whereas states like Maharashtra, Karnataka and Assam have 3 high court benches or more even though the law and order situation there is much better than in UP! Is this equality?  Why UP which has more than 22 crore population which is more than the population of many small countries put together as UP CM Yogi Adityananth keeps proudly proclaiming every now and then has just one high court bench and that too so close to Allahabad? Why not a single high court bench for another lawless state like Bihar? Why only few states are accorded 2 or 3 or 4 high court benches and not others?
                                          Are we doing justice with our Constitution by acting in such a partisan manner? Why people of West UP are compelled to travel whole night to Allahabad many times without reservation as it is difficult to get it done in a short time notice? Why can’t the more than 26 districts of west UP have its own high court bench so that people don’t have to waste so much of time travelling all the way to Allahabad? Why such a third rated treatment for West UP since last more than 70 years of independence? Why is it ignored that initially from 1866 to 1869 the high court itself was in West UP at Agra before being transferred to Allahabad? Still why can’t a bench be created in any of the 26 districts of West UP?
                               I unequivocally hail PM Modi’s many initiatives like awarding the district where the number of pending cases are reduced maximum in a given year but they in itself are just not sufficient to address the burgeoning Frankenstein monster of pending cases unless more high court benches are created in big states like UP especially in West UP! Just recently a 100 year old woman was raped in West UP in Meerut and what is worse is that to seek justice she too has no option but to travel all the way about more than 700 km away to Allahabad as there is not even a single bench of high court here! What sort of justice system is this? Bench so close at Lucknow but no bench in West UP or in Bundelkhand like in Jhansi nor in far off places like Gorakhpur which CM Yogi represents since many decades!    
                      A serious disease like cancer cannot be treated by just a band aid or strepsil. All other steps to address the huge pending cases are bound to fall flat unless and until more high court benches are created in big states like UP, Bihar, Rajasthan among others! But nothing just nothing is being done on this score and only one state that is Karnataka has stood to gain from the recommendations of 230th report of Law Commission which till 2012 had just one bench at Hubli! Why is Centre not taking any steps in this regard? Why more than 9 crore people of West UP are being rashly denied “cheap and speedy justice” since 1947 till 2017?  Why if Supreme Court in near future direct Centre to create more benches will it have the temerity to term it as “judicial activism”? With what face? Why can’t it take emergency steps well in time?
                                       Eminent senior lawyer and revered jurist Harish Salve very rightly points out that if Centre does its job properly then judiciary will never step in! It is inaction on the part of the Centre that compels Supreme Court to step in for which it is then wrongly accused of “judicial activism” as a junior minister in Law in Centre dared to indulge in! Why Nehru can dare to create a bench in Lucknow in 1948 but no PM till now can dare to create even a single bench anywhere else even though Justice Jaswant Commission recommended 3 more benches?
                                  Why inspite of Allahabad High Court completing more than 150 years and being the biggest court not just in India but in whole of Asia has least high court benches only one just nearby at Lucknow and not at any other place like Gorakhpur, Jhansi, Meerut or Agra or any other place? Why no step is being taken to correct this historic blunder? Why a firm determination to carry on with what Nehru did way back in 1947-48? Have things not changed since then? There are many more such compelling soul searching questions which demands answers but no one is ready to ever address them! Just ritually organizing “Law Day” or “Constitution day” will serve just no real purpose unless serious steps are taken like setting up more high court benches as recommended very rightly by 230th report of Law Commission! Hope good sense will prevail!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.   

NGT Pulls Up Delhi Govt As Air Begins To Worsen

Coming straight to the key issue, with the air in Delhi beginning to worsen once again, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on December 4 has pulled up the Delhi government headed by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for not filing a comprehensive action plan detailing ways to deal with the condition. It also questioned authorities on why they held the India-Sri Lanka cricket match at Delhi despite the bad air quality? Why could the match be not held at any other appropriate place?
                                             Needless to say, this is for the first time that a foreign country are playing with masks on their faces! Not just this, some Sri Lankan players complained of uneasiness and one even vomited! It is most disgusting to see that knowing fully well what Delhi is going through yet Delhi was approved for conducting matches and that too not domestic matches but international matches involving players of other countries like Sri Lanka! This should never have happened at the first place!  
                                          While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that a Bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice Swatanter Kumar directed the AAP government to file the action plan within the next 48 hours, even as the State government sought more time stating that both the Chief Secretary and the Environment Secretary had recently changed. But the Bench was very furious with the nonchalant approach of the Delhi government! It minced no words in making it clear what it wanted to convey to the Delhi government!
                                       For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that the Bench lashed out in no uncertain terms saying that, “Where is your action plan? Why have you not submitted it? What can we do if you keep on changing everybody? It’s not our problem if people don’t want to stick to you. You keep on doing meetings but tell us a single action or step you have taken in the last four days to combat air pollution”. Delhi government must take this rap on the knuckles most seriously. This rap has come from none other than the NGT!
                                     To be sure, the Green Tribunal was further more irked by authorities for conducting the third Test between Sri Lanka and India on December 3, which was disrupted due to smog and Lankan players had complained of uneasiness. Why was the match not shifted to some place other than Delhi or cancelled? Why was the green signal given to the match at the first place?
                                     It merits no reiteration that the Bench also minced just no words in making it absolutely clear that, “Every newspaper has been carrying headline that the air pollution was going to be higher this week. Still you took no action. Even the players were playing the match wearing masks. You should have not held the match if the air quality was so bad. Are people of Delhi supposed to bear this?” The Tribunal also pulled up the Delhi government for not introducing odd-even car rationing scheme at this point of time when the air quality is severe!
                                  As it turned out, the AAP government was also pulled up for not introducing the odd-even vehicle rationing scheme at this point when the air quality is severe. It said that, “You want exemptions for two wheelers but you do not apply your mind that these 60 lakh vehicles cause the maximum pollution.” It also said that despite stating before the Tribunal that 4,000 buses would be introduced to decongest the city roads, the city government has not procured a single bus even after three years of assurance. This is really most shocking to learn!
                                         It is the bounden duty of the Delhi government to act promptly because Delhi is our national capital and all this is battering our international image which can never be good for the long term national interests in any manner! Even UN just recently expressed its utmost concern over the pollution level in Delhi. Action has to be taken on a war footing and there is just no other way out.
                                            It is a matter of grave concern that pollution levels in Delhi has worsened on December 4 as the air quality index inched towards ‘severe’. The air quality index was recorded at 390ug/m3 (of a maximum of 500) and was in the ‘very poor’ range. Pollution levels had been shooting up over the past few days because of low wind speed and high moisture levels. This is the most worrying aspect and yet we see little action being taken on the ground to check this. The ground situation in Delhi has become so worse that 1 in 7 traffic cops has lung trouble.
                                     It must be added here that the NGT Bench had on November 17 directed the Delhi government and other NCR states to submit an action plan. The plan was supposed to contain measures that could come into force automatically when pollution hits emergency levels. It is a matter of deep regret that even though Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Rajasthan have already submitted their plan well in time, Delhi is yet to do so!
                                  All said and done, the Sri Lankan players cannot be faulted for wearing masks. They wore masks to protect themselves from the thick smog that had enveloped the whole atmosphere where the match was being played at Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium in Delhi! NGT very rightly rapped the Delhi government for its inaction because if timely action had been taken, India perhaps could have been saved from massive international embarrassment! Delhi government must now admit its grave errors as very rightly pointed out by NGT and set them right by working very hard on this score so that the damage done can be undone to some extent if not fully!  
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Nation, Religion And Parents Can Never Be Changed

It is most hurting to see that the incidents of waving of Pakistani flags in India is growing by the day. This is most reprehensible and condemnable. Under no circumstances can it be ever justified. All this cannot happen without active political patronage of different political parties.
                                            Let me be candid enough to admit that in 1994 when I was terribly upset over many of my very good Hindu friends making a joke of me for not performing well in BSc especially in Second year in which I lost one year not because of my lack of hard work but because my Botany paper was not checked properly and revaluation result came after the Supplementary exams were over and only one of my Muslim friend Sageer Khan stood by me in a manner which I can’t describe in words I was very impressed by him and I told him that I too want to become Muslim like him and moreover I feel that in Hindu religion I have no place as my friends mock me and Lord Shiv too has no time for me.
                                     Sageer Khan was in tears. He immediately took my hand on his head and asked to me to give a vow to him that I will never change in life: Nation, religion and parents. He told me that just like he is a born Muslim and will die as a Muslim similarly I also should never ever think of renouncing my religion. He also asked me to worship Lord Shiv till my death whom I had worshipped till then but at that point of time had lost all faith in him. He said that, “All religions are but different paths and who all have one common destination God whom we call by different names like Hindus call God as Lord Shiv, Lord Krishan etc and Muslims call it Allah. One should never renounce one’s religion, God, parents and nation under any circumstances come what may because there can be no substitute for them!”
                                      Even in my wildest of dreams I had never expected that a Muslim whom I always thought of as “Mandir (Temple) tod (breaker) and Murti (Idol) tod (breaker) would one day make sure that I regularly visit Mandir (temple) and worship Murti (Idol). It was a coincidence that whenever he accompanied me to temple, the idol that I saw in front of me was not of Lord Shiv  but of Lord Hanuman and Ma Durga whom till then I never worshipped but since then always invoke their name!
                                           Such Indians who inspite of staying in India wave Pakistani flags must introspect and ask themselves: Is Pakistan a country worth staying? Certainly not. This alone explains why my best friend Sageer Khan once said to me that, “Those who shout slogans supporting Pakistan and wave Pakistani flags never go to Pakistan to settle there permanently because they too know fully well that it is a rogue country where Mohajjirs (Muslims from India) are still treated like refugees, third rated citizens and discriminated against and similarly those in PoK are not given any voting right or any other right and similarly the people of Balochistan are slaughtered like animals. I bet that if such Indians who wave Pakistani flags and shout Pakistani slogans are told to leave India permanently, they will themselves never go to Pakistan.”
                                         Sageer Khan further said once to few of his Muslims friends which I overheard from outside a room that, “Muslims are most safest in India and India alone. There can be no country more safe for Muslims in the world than India. Taliban  means student but see how Pakistan is making them terrorists. Jihad means a holy war by which poorest of poor benefits but see how innocents are being killed in name of Jihad. Hafiz means a person who learns Quran by heart but see how terrorists are naming themselves Hafiz in Pakistan! Mujahideen means a person (Mujahid) who struggles for betterment of society but see how terror groups are being named after it! Islam means “submission to peace” but see how violence is being spread in name of Islam! Nothing can be more insulting than this!”
                                     Sageer also said that, “It is only in India that Muslims can lay claim to Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi despite knowing fully well that these places have been Hindu’s pilgrimages site since time immemorial which I totally oppose. If Hindus also similarly lay claim to Mecca and Medina, will any Muslim in the whole world ever accept it? No, not just in Mecca or Medina but Muslims will not allow temple to be built in any place in Saudi Arabia or in any other Gulf country. I bet it.  Also, no true Muslim will ever offer namaz in a disputed site. Also, since no namaz had been offered in the site where Babri Masjid stood since last more than seventy years, it ceases to be a mosque. Moreover, Muslims must learn tolerance from Hindus who have been tolerating this nonsense since so many years”!  
                                         Having said this, let me also bring out here that there are many more like my best friend Sageer Khan. Mohammad Amir Khan was wrongly implicated in about 20 terror cases in 1998 and was wrongly jailed and tortured for about 14 years and his father died as he could not tolerate people calling him as “father of terrorist” and his mother also became paralysed and later died yet he still feels proud to wave Indian flag and calls himself an Indian! NHRC recently awarded him Rs 5 lakh compensation also for being wrongly jailed yet he never waves Pakistani flags nor shouts slogans supporting Pakistan! Such Indians who have never been sent to jail nor ever labelled “terrorist” nor tortured yet chant “Pakistan, Pakistan” and wave “Pakistani flags” must learn something from him! For me, Mohammad Amir Khan is the “real Bharat Ratna” who is a living testimony to prove that Pakistan can never give India what India can give to them!
                                      It is wrong to slap sedition charges against 11 people raising anti-national slogans during the victory march of a Congress candidate Sana Khan in Dhaurhara Nagar Panchayat in Lakhimpur Kheri. They must be asked as to do they really like Pakistan so much that they wave flags and raise slogans in their favour and do they really hate India so much that they abuse their nation. If the answer is in the affirmative then they must be immediately sent to Pakistan! Adnan Sami who was a Pakistani singer came to India and settled in Mumbai and took Indian citizenship! Why can’t they too behave similarly and take Pakistani citizenship if they are really so attracted to Pakistan?    
                                         My best friend Sageer Khan said to me in 1994, “I challenge that not one Muslim of India will ever be ready to go to Pakistan if they are asked to go and if someone still really wants to go then why stop them? Why slap Indian laws on them in which they don’t believe? Why treat them like Indians when they consider themselves as Pakistanis? Why accord them Indian citizenship? Why no national party is prepared to draft Uniform National Code in which clear provisions must be made that those who abuse India, burn Indian flags and wave Pakistani flags and shout slogans supporting Pakistan would be deprived of Indian citizenship and would not be given any benefit henceforth? Not one Indian will then ever dare to indulge in such anti-national acts”!
                                         But that is the real tragedy! Indian politicians of all parties including BJP will never dare to do such thing for reasons known best to them nor will they ever revoke Most Favoured Nation status wrongly given to a country like Pakistan which is the biggest insult to our soldiers and martyrs because it is Pakistan and Pakistan alone who is responsible for sponsoring cross border terrorism in India since last many decades yet we maintain cordial relations with them even though Kuwait has revoked all relations with Pakistan and ordered all Pakistanis to leave Pakistan as they get lured to terror acts very easily and are a grave national threat to them! Can Indian leaders of any party ever dare to do similarly? Never!
                                           This is the real crisis of India!  What can you expect from leaders who are themselves morally bankrupt and who believe in inviting Pakistani invaders like Gen Musharraf who as Pakistani Army Chief had masterminded Kargil war in which we lost more than 600 soldiers just 2 to 3 months after Kargil war? All leaders unitedly welcomed Gen Musharraf and not one word was spoken against him except one or two notable exception and that is Pranab Mukherjee who lambasted Centre for inviting a rogue who called terrorist as “freedom fighters” and terrorism as “freedom struggle” and also Maulana Mehmood Madani who advised Musharraf to not start his politics from India and not to worry about Indian Muslims as 95% Hindus are with them always which angered him to no end!
                                       Rajiv Chandrashekhar who is MP from Bangalore wanted to get Pakistan declared as “rogue and terror sponsor country” and had even placed a private members Bill in Parliament but not one national party supported him even though leaders of big parties in UN forum always slam Pakistan as “Terroristan”! This must change now if India is to progress! All relations with Pakistan must be nuked as long as it continues exporting terrorism to India and keep fomenting trouble here! But no national party is prepared for this for reasons known best to them! Before concluding, let me again reiterate what my best friend Sageer Khan said to me way back in 1993-94 that, “Anything can be changed but religion, parents and nation can never be changed come what may. Never forget this if you truly consider me your friend in life”. Absolutely right!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.  

PM: 3 Pillars Must Work Together For New India

Coming straight to the crux of the matter, let me begin by first and foremost pointing out that Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 26, 2017 stressed the need for the judiciary, Government and executive to strengthen each other and work together for a new India. 
PM: 3 Pillars Must Work Together For New India
However, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra emphasized that judiciary has a Constitutional duty to interpret and enforce a policy or law and apply “judicially manageable standards” to assess if a policy of the Government be interfered with. CJI has a valid point and it is a fact that judiciary has always taken care not to step into the terrain of the executive unless and until it is absolutely the crying need of the hour!
                                   While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me also inform them that while speaking at the Law Day function organized by the Law Commission of India, both PM Narendra Modi and CJI Dipak Misra did agree on one point that to maintain balance between the three wings of the State, there should not be any claim to supremacy. The commendable restraint exercised by the judiciary can be gauged from one glaring but never highlighted fact that the first Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru created a single bench of high court for such a big state like UP (which has maximum population, maximum MPs, maximum MLAs, maximum Judges, maximum pending cases, maximum crime, maximum districts, maximum towns, maximum villages more than one lakh and what not) at Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad just about 150 km away and that too way back on July 1, 1948 but not at any other place! Seventy years have lapsed since independence but not a single bench of high court has been added till now in any hook and corner of the state by any Prime Minister till now!
                                    This despite the fact that Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by former PM late Mrs Indira Gandhi had recommended the setting up of 3 high court benches at Agra, Dehradun and Nainital but not a single bench was approved for UP even though the hilly people of UP which is now a separate State called Uttarakhand had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way to Allahabad to attend a single hearing as there was no high court bench either in the hilly areas nor in West UP! What more raw discrimination can be on display than the irrefutable fact that on the recommendations of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission, a high court bench was created for Maharashtra at Aurangabad, at Jalpaiguri in West Bengal and Madurai in Tamil Nadu! But did judiciary interfere? The answer is a “resounding no”!
                                   The former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon had slammed UP as “rape and crime capital of India” and here too maximum crime, maximum killings and maximum riots all take place in West UP still not a single high court bench here! Even former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1986 had demanded high court bench for West UP in Parliament but 31 years later still no bench! The 230th report of Law Commission recommended creation of more benches in 2009 but even as 2018 is about to start only one state Karnataka has gained as 2 more benches were approved for just 4 and 8 districts at Dharwad and Gulbarga even though it is a peaceful states with pending cases in high court not exceeding 2 lakh but in UP where pending cases exceed 10 lakh we see only one high court bench at Lucknow! Is this fair?
                                   Why West UP which has more population than any other state except Bihar, Maharashtra and UP of which it is itself a part and accounts for more than half of the pending cases of UP yet has no high court bench here and litigants are compelled to travel whole night often without reservation all the way to Allahabad as there is no high court bench in any of the 26 districts of West UP? Why Bihar has not even a single high court bench which is again notorious for lawlessness and 3 or 4 benches for states like Assam, Maharashtra, Karnataka among others? West UP area is 98,000 square km and that of Bihar is 94,000 square km yet Bihar has high court but West UP not even a bench! The high court and benches of 8 states and above all Lahore high court is nearer to West UP as compared to Allahabad!
                                     Why has Centre utterly failed to do anything on this score? Why Justice Jaswant Singh Commission landmark recommendations for creating 3  high court benches for UP were disregarded due to which lawyers of West UP started striking everySaturday since May 1981 and even went on strike not for 1 or 2 or 3 but for more than 6 months from July 2001 onwards and for a month in 2010 and for 3 months in 2014-15 apart from many other strikes for many weeks together? Why UP has more population than Pakistan and is 5th largest in world in population and areawise also is bigger than many states put together yet has just one high court bench created by Nehruji in 1948 but no PM even 70 years later cannot dare to create a single bench anywhere else in 2018? Why Allahabad High Court has completed more than 150 years of existence and is among the biggest court as also oldest in whole of Asia yet has just a single high court bench at Lucknow and nowhere else? Why Yogi Adityanath as MP had demanded creation of bench in Gorakhpur in 1998 but even in 2018 we will see no bench? Why high court and a single bench both in Eastern UP but no bench anywhere else either in West UP or in Gorakhpur in Bundelkhand at Jhansi or anywhere else? Is this not the worst case of violation of the fundamental right to equality as enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution? Why BJP leaders are getting murdered every second day in different parts of West UP still no high court bench is being set up here in any of the 26 districts?
                                        Anyway, coming to main subject, Modi while putting it succinctly said that, “We know our individual strengths and weaknesses. It is not a question of proving who is superior as every decision or step taken by each wing affects the life of common man. The question we need to ask is whether as members of one family, do we work to strengthen and support each other in realizing the common aspirations of all citizens contained in the Constitution or not”. Asserting that the Indian Constitution is as vibrant as possible, and even more sensitive, Modi said the Constitution is accountable, competent and sacred and has kept the spirit of democracy alive. Why people of West UP are being punished to travel whole night without reservation many times more than 700 km all the way to Allahabad as there is no bench in West UP but only in Lucknow? Why people of West UP are not being given speedy and cheap justice at doorsteps by setting up a bench here?
                                 Hailing the makers of the Constitution, Modi said, “It was not easy to make a historical document which binds a country which has more than a dozen sects, more than 100 languages, and more than 1,700 dialects and people living in places with various beliefs.” Modi also called for judiciary to ensure that nobody rises above the law. He said that, “Nothing is above the law. The law itself lies in the power of the king and the law enables the poor to fight the mighty weak. While on the same mantra, our Government has also worked out new laws and dismantling old laws to Living the Ease of being.” I fully appreciate this landmark step of dismantling old laws and working out new laws but why can’t similarly old benches at places not required or at the very least establishing new benches at places where required like in West UP, Bihar, Western Odisha and many other places not carried out not even in any one place even as Modi is all set to complete 4 years in office? Why no action is being taken on  this score inspite of 230th report of Law Commission of India strongly recommending so?
                                         Referring to the President’s concern regarding the judiciary, Modi also made the case for equitable representation in the judiciary. He said that, “Yesterday, the honourable President also expressed his concern that there was a nervousness in coming up to the court for poor justice. The result of all our efforts should be that it is not frightened by the poor court, and the justices at the time and the procedures of the court are also reduced.” Claiming that the balance between the judiciary, legislature and executive has been the backbone of the Constitution, Modi said legislature, executive and judiciary should keep in mind the decorum dictated by the Constitution.
                                       Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad severely criticized the judiciary for failing to be accountable by stalling reforms in judicial appointments and hampering development by entering policy making spheres of Government and thus violating the golden rule of separation of powers. The CJI Dipak Misra countered this by saying that, “All wings of the State are bound by the principle of constitutional sovereignty and there should not be any claim to supremacy by any wing. I assure everybody that Constitution never envisaged what is not judicially manageable standard. There are instances where we have refused to entertain PILs as we felt judiciary cannot dictate Government on policy matters. But when policies are framed, we have a Constitutional duty to interpret it and enforce it.”
                                              What bigger proof is needed than CJI himself asserting that judiciary has refused to entertain PILs as it felt judiciary cannot dictate Government on policy matters. But the moot question is: Why Centre takes no action on several key issues like setting up more high court benches in big states like UP notorious for worsening law and order where even foreigners are attacked as a Swiss couple was attacked in Agra and a 100 year old woman was brutally raped in Meerut! Why Prasad who in his first tenure as Law Minister had favoured the creation of a bench in West UP has maintained a stoic silence on this in his second term? Why he can’t even set up one bench even in his own lawless state Bihar when UPA’s Law Minister could manage to set up 2 benches for just 4 and 8 districts?
                                              Referring to the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) case where a Constitutional amendment for appointing Judges was struck down by the Supreme Court, Prasad pointed to a High Court Judge sent to jail for contempt of court. He said this showed the quality of Judges selected by the Supreme Court Collegium and urged the need for an “audit” to ascertain what the country has lost in the process. But what about increasing criminals finding entry in Parliament and State Assemblies? Why no step taken to stop this open mockery of democracy?
                                      Why those bunking sessions of Parliament and State Assemblies are not deprived of their status as MP or MLA or at the very least why their salary is not deducted? Why politicians are allowed to contest from jails even though no one can vote from jail? Why no step is taken to bar those MPs and MLAs who resort to unruly scenes in Parliament or State Assemblies?
                                         Why when a single false complaint also can bar a person from applying in any government job then why can a person after indulging in dacoity, killings, rape, murders etc can still enter Parliament? Why no check imposed on politicians? Why politicians alone are empowered to decide their own salary and increase it as much as they want and whenever they want with no checks and balances?
                                      Why no change is being initiated on this count? Law Minister must very seriously introspect on all this before lambasting judiciary! Why even dacoits and rapists can become MPs and MLAs very easily after labelling charges as “false”, “fabricated” and “politically motivated” while imposing very high standards on other government servants like IAS, IPS, Judge or Army officer or even a soldier or a clerk when even a false FIR eliminates all chances of securing a government job? Why this worst discrimination? Are politicians above the law? Why then are they given exemptions everywhere? Why no transparency in political funding and why political parties are exempted from disclosing from where all they got funds and how much when others are all mandated by law to do so? Are politicians above law? If not then why are they treated so?
                                         Ravi Shankar Prasad said that his office cannot remain merely a “post office” to forward names of Judges forwarded by Collegium. The CJI differed sharply saying, “We never imagined nor regard office of Law Minister as a post office. We never ignore his views and many times out of mutual respect do not reiterate our recommendation acting on the views he sends…There may be certain occasions where orders are passed by Supreme Court under Article 142 (to do complete justice). But things are done and rectified later on.” What CJI is saying has a point.
                                      It is a fact that Gopal Subramanium who was a former Solicitor General inspite of being recommended by Collegium was rejected by Government on IB report which is no basis for rejecting anyone’s name! There are many more such unreported cases! Can anyone deny this? CJI further went on to say that, “Many things we have accepted with mutual respect. We are absolutely conscious where we can intervene and where we cannot. One institution should not claim supremacy over the other.”
                                  Acting as the peacemaker on the occasion, PM Modi said that, “We must strive to work together to strengthen each other and understand problems facing each other. The balance of the three wings is the backbone of our Constitution. This is the reason that despite Emergency we have maintained on the path of democracy.” He also emphasized on the Indian Constitution’s important role in the country’s overall development after independence and said it has withstood the test of time.    
                                     All said and done, PM Modi is absolutely right that all 3 pillars must work together for new India. New India is possible only if more high court benches are set up as recommended by 230th report of Law Commission of India especially where law and order situation is very bad like UP and Bihar which occupy first and second position in terms of crime and murders of persons yet Bihar has no high court bench and UP has just one bench and West UP which accounts for more than half of pending cases as was testified by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission has not even a single high court bench even though it recommended the setting up of 3 high court benches! Why is Law Minister inspite of coming from Bihar taking no steps in this regard? Can he please explain?
                                      When Law Minister from Karnataka can create 2 more benches for Karnataka despite one being already at Hubli then why is Prasad from Bihar sitting quiet? Can he again explain? Can Prasad explain why since last so many years more than half of posts of Judges were lying vacant even in High Courts like Allahabad and Calcutta and the latter had even rapped Centre for it?
                                          On a concluding note, before blaming judiciary for all ills, politicians must introspect and remember that when you point one finger at other you are pointing three fingers at yourself! Who is stopping Prasad from creating more benches and why no benches created in last 3 to 4 years inspite of his government enjoying brute majority in Parliament? Can he again explain? Every organ of the state should remain within its space, respect limits and do its duty under the Constitution as the PM Modi very rightly emphasized also while stressing on balance of power between 3 pillars who must all work together for new India!  
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.    

The Real Face Of Musharraf Stands Exposed Yet Again

I am not at all surprised by what all this Pakistani invader Pervez Musharraf who is also the former Pakistani Army Chief and former President has said while endorsing the dreaded Lashkar-e-Taiba’s Chief Hafiz Saeed that, “I’m Lashkar’s biggest supporter, they like me too”! Nothing new in what he has said! Everyone knows fully well what sort of criminal mentality he nurtures even though many in India deliberately ignored it and tried to search for everything good in him and in fact claimed to have found all good qualities in him! That Musharraf and terror groups are in close cahoots with each other was an open secret and now that also as also the real face of Musharraf stands exposed yet again!
The Real Face Of Musharraf Stands Exposed Yet Again

                                With what face some Indian journalists, politicians, diplomats and intellectuals clinged to the illusion that Manmohan-Musharrraf formula could resolve the complicated J&K issue? With what face they demanded withdrawal of all Indian troops from J&K as demanded by  Musharraf to “make borders irrelevant” which found huge support among many politicians and diplomats among others? With what face they always advocated to trust Musharraf as that alone could bring “peace” in J&K?
                                       With what face they ignored that Musharraf was the one who had masterminded Siachen intrusion in 1984 when Musharraf was Brigadier in which he miserably failed? With what face they ignored that Musharraf was the one who as he himself acknowledged was the one who entered 15-16 km inside Indian territory to boost his soldiers and terrorists to conquer Kargil in 1999 in which he again failed miserably? With what face did they gave him honour knowing fully well that it was Musharraf who was the mastermind of the Kargil war in which we lost more than 600 soldiers as per official figures even though unofficially the figure is much higher?   
                                           With what face did they gave him honour knowing it fully well that it was Musharraf who refused to accept the dead body of his soldiers and terrorists and had it not been for India’s large-heartedness perhaps dogs would have eaten their dead body? With what face did they expect anything from Musharraf and gave him honour knowing it fully well that it was Musharraf who ordered his soldiers to torture mercilessly Captain Saurav Kalia and 5 soldiers of 4 Jat Regiment not for one day or two days or ten days or twenty days but for full twenty days and after pouring hot water on them, gouging out their eyes, ears and nose with hot iron rods, torturing them with cigarettes as body bore signs of cigarette torture, chopping off even fingers, private parts and then putting them in their mouth and then finally shooting them at the head and then handing them back to India and yet our shameless politicians and big media houses shamelessly honoured this Pakistani invader and mass murderer Musharraf just 2 to 3 months after Kargil war as if he had done a big favour on India? Will any self-respecting nation behave like this?  
                                    With what face did they gave him honour knowing it fully well that it was Musharraf who had threatened to slit India by the throat and said that if former PM Nawaz Sharif had not rushed to USA, he would have throttled India and snatched away J&K from India? With what face they gave him honour knowing fully well that it was Musharraf who had threatened to nuke India if its soldiers dared to step even one step inside Pakistan’s territory as he felt strongly that only Pakistani Army who had the birthright to commit aggression and not Indian Army? With what face they gave him honour knowing fully well that he even contemplated to nuke India after terrorists of Jaish-e-Mohammad attacked Parliament and there was tension built up between both the countries?
                                            With what face they gave him honour knowing fully well that he had awarded Rs 1 lakh as cash prize to dreaded Al Qaeda terrorist Iliyas Kashmiri for presenting him a severed head of an Indian soldier Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar on 27 February 2000 and promised to always keep the head of Talekar as a trophy with him as long as he is alive as was reported in all English dailies and Pakistani media proudly published photographs of Kashmiri carrying severed head of Talekar? With what face did they hope that Musharraf would soon reform himself? With what face did they hope that if Musharraf is honoured, he would cease all hostility towards India and would become a peace ambassador?
                                    With what face did they ignore the anger of our former President Pranab Mukherjee who expressed his disgust at Musharraf being honoured in India? With what face did they ignore that Musharraf hailed terrorists like Hafiz Saeed as freedom fighters and terrorism in J&K as “freedom struggle over which Pranab Mukherjee expressed his huge anger and dismay? With what face did they ignore that Musharraf ensured that maximum terror attacks were carried out in his reign?   
                                     With what face did they ignore that Musharraf termed terrorists like Osama and Hafiz as heroes by saying that, “Osama to hero hain ji hero! Hafiz Saeed to bilkul aasli hero hain ji aasli hero! Syed Salaluddin bhi hero hain ji hero! Bharat ke liye yeh aatankwadi hain paar hamare liye to yeh aasli hero hain ji aasli hero. Aajma ke dekh lo Bharat ne to aajma ke dekh rakha hain”? With what face did they ignore that Musharraf had given out of turn promotion to those soldiers who had brutally tortured our soldiers during Kargil war apart from cash and other rewards? With what face did they ignore that Musharraf wanted India to give J&K to Pakistan on a plate and had threatened India with many more Kargils if J&K issue was not resolved as per his wishes?
                                          With what face did they ignore that Musharraf welcomed dreaded terror leaders like Masood Azhar and others by according them red carpet after planning and masterminding their release? With what face they ignore that Musharraf is himself a declared “proclaimed offender” and even his property has been ordered to be attached? With what face they ignore that Musharraf was himself involved in many murders like murder of a Maulvi Abdul Rashid who was Imam of Lal Masjid, Nawab Bukhti of Baluchistan and none other than former Pakistan PM Benazir Bhutto to name a few? With what face they ignore that Musharraf stands charged with treason and faces punishment which could extend even up to death sentence? With what face they ignore that this shameless Musharraf is living a wretched life as an exiler sometimes in Dubai or in other Gulf countries or in UK and now no one cares for him in his own country that is Pakistan?
                                         With what face they honoured him and allowed him to lambast the condition of Indian Muslims? It is a different matter that Maulana Mehmood Madani of Jamiat-e-Ulema-Hind lambasted him very hard and advised him not to start politics of Pakistan from India and not to worry about Indian Muslims as 99% of Indian Hindus were solidly behind Muslims and he experienced what a headless chicken witnesses not knowing what to do next! The real face of Musharraf now again stands exposed but there are few journalists, media houses and politicians who will still not like to treat Musharraf as a “closed chapter” and would feel honoured to shamelessly laugh and talk with a shameless person like him who could never defeat India in any war that he undertook as we keep seeing in different news channels even now!
                                       I really pity him and those shameless Indian media houses, journalists and politicians who always look towards him for developing good relations with Pakistan despite knowing fully well his visceral hatred which he nurtures against India! Even now they will refuse to see the clear writing on the wall and still continue invoking him for having peace in J&K! Shame on them! Musharraf batting for Hafiz will make no difference in international arena for the world knows fully well what type of special chemistry is shared between Hafiz and Musharraf! The real face of Musharraf stands exposed yet again!  
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.