- Encouraging someone to ask questions or give answers to questions no one is asking?
- Helping learners discover worlds of fascinating and worthwhile knowledge around them versus providing them information from books?
- Setting challenging tasks versus \’telling\’ children, giving explanatory lectures ?
- Encouraging reflection or ensuring memorization of the right answers?
- Preventing errors or letting children discover for themselves when they\’ve made a mistake?
- Giving feedback versus giving marks (and remarks)?
- Ensuring all children get the same opportunity versus ensuring different children get different opportunities?
- Doing everything oneself (if you\’re a teacher) versus passing on some of your tasks to children (e.g. marking attendance, ensuring participation of peers)
- Maintaining all provided materials in good shape or using them at the risk of their getting spoilt, torn, etc.?
- Asking community to help with their knowledge heritage versus asking community to contribute to improvement in mid day meal?
- Using a textbook as a resource versus using a textbook as a definitive material (i.e. assuming it is the curriculum)
- Reading this blog or reading a useful book on education?!
What is (more) \’Educationally Responsible\’?
- Encouraging someone to ask questions or give answers to questions no one is asking?
- Helping learners discover worlds of fascinating and worthwhile knowledge around them versus providing them information from books?
- Setting challenging tasks versus \’telling\’ children, giving explanatory lectures ?
- Encouraging reflection or ensuring memorization of the right answers?
- Preventing errors or letting children discover for themselves when they\’ve made a mistake?
- Giving feedback versus giving marks (and remarks)?
- Ensuring all children get the same opportunity versus ensuring different children get different opportunities?
- Doing everything oneself (if you\’re a teacher) versus passing on some of your tasks to children (e.g. marking attendance, ensuring participation of peers)
- Maintaining all provided materials in good shape or using them at the risk of their getting spoilt, torn, etc.?
- Asking community to help with their knowledge heritage versus asking community to contribute to improvement in mid day meal?
- Using a textbook as a resource versus using a textbook as a definitive material (i.e. assuming it is the curriculum)
- Reading this blog or reading a useful book on education?!
What is (more) \’Educationally Responsible\’?
- Encouraging someone to ask questions or give answers to questions no one is asking?
- Helping learners discover worlds of fascinating and worthwhile knowledge around them versus providing them information from books?
- Setting challenging tasks versus \’telling\’ children, giving explanatory lectures ?
- Encouraging reflection or ensuring memorization of the right answers?
- Preventing errors or letting children discover for themselves when they\’ve made a mistake?
- Giving feedback versus giving marks (and remarks)?
- Ensuring all children get the same opportunity versus ensuring different children get different opportunities?
- Doing everything oneself (if you\’re a teacher) versus passing on some of your tasks to children (e.g. marking attendance, ensuring participation of peers)
- Maintaining all provided materials in good shape or using them at the risk of their getting spoilt, torn, etc.?
- Asking community to help with their knowledge heritage versus asking community to contribute to improvement in mid day meal?
- Using a textbook as a resource versus using a textbook as a definitive material (i.e. assuming it is the curriculum)
- Reading this blog or reading a useful book on education?!
Using Performance Standards to Improve Teacher Effectiveness
- The most important way to generate teacher motivation is to enable them to experience success in the classroom. Hence a set of minimum enabling conditions being in place make a huge difference.
- Teachers change when they experience the standards, rather than simply being told about them – towards this, the in-service courses themselves need to incorporate the standards expected of teachers. (A few of the states have begun this process of improving their own inputs to teachers.)
- There is a sequence in which teachers learn (and indeed institutions and systems learn). It is also better to avoid overcrowding expectations. It would therefore be best to plan improvement in terms of stages of teacher development, broken down into three-month phases, each of which has a very limited number of indicators to be attained (4-8). As teachers attain one set of indicators, this motivates them as well as prepares them for the next, higher order, set. The support institutions, too, learn along with the teachers and grow phase-wise in turn.
- Standards and indicators can tend to be vague! It is important to convert them into concrete steps that can actually be implemented by teachers. Thus, if an indicator agreed upon is ‘children ask questions freely, without fear’ there is a need to make clear exactly what the teacher needs to do for this to happen. Hence, as part of the roll out, all teams need to detail the concrete steps involved in converting the expectations into actionable steps.
- Implementer choice and partnering with teachers is more likely to yield results than passing on a set of instructions. In sub-district meetings, teachers should get to choose the indicators they want to attain (from a given list of potential indicators for that stage, though) and identify / develop the steps needed to attain these. Their performance will be assessed against the indicators chosen by them. If possible, peer assessment will be introduced.
- ‘Target setting’ in terms of the degree of improvement in performance can now be practiced. Teachers and their resource persons can use the standards document to fix the degree of change they seek to bring about over, say, a year or six months. They can then assess their progress against this. As this was not possible earlier, improvement efforts tended to lose their way very soon.
- Taking a ‘low-interference’ approach helps – that is, there is no pressure on the system to change curriculum or textbooks or introduce new model of teaching. It is more a case of ‘doing the same as before, but a little differently’; this reduces systemic stress and enables rapid implementation.
IMPLICATIONS OF PRAGMATISM IN MODERN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM
John Dewey (1859-1952) becomes its leading and most influential exponent. He practised it in his laboratory school set up in Chicago in 1896.His purpose was to train pupils in co-operation and mutually useful living.
Blame the Russian Mob
In the aftermath of 9/11, in a North Carolina college – a public university – freshmen were given an abridged version of the Koran to read. The selected passages where from Mohammad’s early Meccan period when he was preaching tolerance – a tolerance he needed as an outsider trying to get acceptance. Left out were the harsh Medinan warrior passages showing Mohammed’s mature ideology. To the student, Mohammad resembled Jesus. If this was the Bible, the ACLU would be on the case.
Recently, a widely used high school text propagandizes for Islam. “Across the Centuries,” put out by a major textbook publisher, presents a “Sunday School” or perhaps we should say “Friday School” version of Islam. In general, students are taught to be sympathetic to the teachings of Islam.
Why is Islam given such respect? Why are people teaching lies about Islam? Why is there a taboo against being critical of Islam?
Business gives way to travel
I will instead be blogging on my travel blog which is here.
Business can wait until I return !!
Screw around with Kraft
Companies don\’t make investment decisions based on tax rates
Companies don\’t make investment decisions based on tax rates
Companies don\’t make investment decisions based on tax rates
Companies don\’t make investment decisions based on tax rates
Companies don\’t make investment decisions based on tax rates
Companies don\’t make investment decisions based on tax rates
Are teachers villains or victims?
People who think thus are, of course, only being \’nice\’. Because there are any number of others who have less \’nice\’ ways of putting it. \’Bloody teachers, curse them, they don\’t work at all. They\’re never there in school, and when they\’re there they don\’t teach. And if they teach, they don\’t teach properly, beat children, and don\’t even know themselves what they\’re supposed to teach. All they\’re interested in is their salaries, and making money from the grants that flow to the school.\’
In fact, this is unfortunately a very widely held view, especially among officials, supervisors, trainers and others who are in any way responsible for and towards teachers. Condemn them, point out all their flaws (exaggerate where it helps) and hold them accountable for all the ills of the education system. Teacher condemnation remains the starting point of many discussions related to improving education.
Anyone who spends time in school trying to implement what teachers are asked do on a daily basis soon finds that motivation has a way of evaporating rather rapidly. You\’re supposed to teach children of one class, but you find yourself teaching more than one class, of children at different ages, with huge variations among them. Often, you don\’t know their language, and whatever you do, so many of them seem not to be getting it at all (partly also because they cannot attend regularly). Far from support, you get indifference (often derision) from those who are supposed to support you (head teachers, community representatives, supervisors, officials). Soon, if you happen to be from another area than your posting, you start trying to get yourself transferred.
Those \’above\’ them are not immune to exploiting teachers either – using their services to support their own administrative tasks, or even asking them to pay bribes for getting their travel allowance or even school grants (I came across a state where teachers used to be paid only Rs.400 as the TLM grant, with someone siphoning off Rs.100!).
But this doesn\’t mean teachers should absent themselves from school or beat children up, you would say. It\’s true, they shouldn\’t. It\’s just that it\’s so hard (and rare) to experience success as a teacher that it\’s not so surprising. Perhaps our system is victimizing teachers such that they\’re becoming villains? Or do you think they\’re only victims? Or are they really villains?


You must be logged in to post a comment.