Author: 1111 EduPub

EduPub (Edupedia Publications Pvt Ltd) is a company dedicated to the development of the education, learning, research and innovation in the field of the research and books publication. We are pioneer in providing wide range of services to educational institutions, government agencies, individuals and corporates in the field of training and education, research and development, research and innovation. research and publication.

Persons Under Illegal Detention Shall Be Paid Compensation By State

It is a matter of great solace, immense satisfaction and tremendous happiness to note that in a latest, learned, laudable and landmark judgment titled Shiv Kumar Verma and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. – 16386 of 2020, while underscoring in no uncertain terms that the award of compensation for harassment by public authorities not only compensates the individual, satisfies him personally but helps in curing social evil, the Allahabad High Court has most commendably directed the State Government to strictly implement its policy of granting compensation to a citizen (25k), who has been illegally detained. What also cannot be missed out is that the Bench of Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Justice Shamim Ahmed also unanimously, unhesitatingly and unconditionally appreciated the State Government for coming up with a policy decision to pay compensation of Rs 25,000/- for illegal detention of any citizen by any Officer of the State Government and initiation of disciplinary proceedings against such officer. The Court was dealing with the illegal detention of 2 persons who continued to be under detention despite submitting personal bond and other papers as directed under the pretext of verification and thus they challenged their illegal detention before the Court.
To start with, the ball is set rolling in para 2 of this brief, brilliant, balanced and bold judgment authored by Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani for himself and Justice Shamim Ahmed wherein it is put forth that, “This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs: 
“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to give compensation to the petitioners in lieu of illegal detention from 12.10.2020 to 21.10.2020 in connection with Case Crime No.624 of 2020, State vs. Shiv Kumar Verma and another, under Section 151, 107 and 116 Cr.P.C., Police Station Rohania, District Varanasi.””
While stating the facts of the present case, the Bench then observes in para 3 that, “Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that there was some dispute relating to ancestral property between the petitioners and their family members. In paragraph 3 of the writ petition, it has been stated that some tiff arose between the petitioners and other family members, namely, Rajendra Prasad, Shiv Kumar Verma and Raj Kumar Verma regarding partition of an ancestral land and in apprehension of breach of public peace, the police arrested the petitioners under Section 151 Cr.P.C. on 08.10.2020. A Challani Report dated 08.10.2020 was submitted by the Sub Inspector, Police Station Rohania, District Varanasi to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Varanasi under Section 151/107/116 Cr.P.C., which was in printed form and merely name of the petitioners and others, name of village and “land dispute” have been filled by ink in the aforesaid Challani Report. On receipt of the Challani Report, the Sub Divisional Magistrate registered the case as Case No.624 of 2020 (State vs. Shiv Kumar Maurya and others) and passed the following order on 08.10.2020” which to put it shortly reveals that the petitioners were sent to jail for not submitting personal bonds and other papers.”
Shortly put, the Bench then states in para 4 that, “It appears that on 12.10.2020 the petitioners submitted personal bond and other papers but the respondent no.3 has not released them and instead, under the pretext of verification, directed the file to be placed on 21.10.2020.”
As a corollary, the Bench then discloses in para 5 that, “Thereafter, on 21.10.2020 the petitioners were released. Aggrieved with the arbitrary and illegal action of the respondents and illegal detention, the petitioners have filed the present writ petition praying for the relief as afore-quoted.”
As we see, the Bench then to put it shortly states in para 7 that, “In paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit dated 02.02.2021, the respondent no.1 has stated that the State Government has taken corrective action in the matter vide letters/circulars dated 30th January, 2021 and 31st January, 2021.”
Needless to say, the Bench then specifies in para 8 that, “In compliance to the afore-quoted Government Order dated 30.01.2021, the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh has issued a Circular being letter No. DG-8-94 (Order) 2021, dated 31.01.2021 to all the Zonal Additional Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, and all the Police Commissioners, Uttar Pradesh and directed them to ensure strict compliance of the afore-quoted Government order.” 
As is quite ostensible, the Bench then lays bare in para 9 that, “From the facts briefly noted above and the counter affidavit of respondent no.1, it stands admitted that the police authorities are arbitrarily and illegally submitting Challani Reports under Sections 107/116 Cr.P.C. Since the respondent no.1 has taken steps to correct the mistakes and illegalities, therefore, we do not propose to issue any further direction in that regard, except that the afore-quoted Circulars dated 30th January, 2021 and 31st January, 2021 shall be strictly implemented in the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh.”
To say the least, the Bench then envisages in para 10 that, “In the counter affidavit dated 01.02.2021, the respondent no.3 has stated in paragraph 5 and 8 that “the petitioners submitted the applications through their counsel that they are ready to furnish personal bonds as well as bail bonds, therefore, they may be released on bail and the answering respondent directed the concerned Tehsildar to verify the revenue records produced by the sureties and on verification the petitioners shall be released on 21.10.2020 on bail.” 
Truth be told, the Bench then lays down in para 11 that, “In his counter affidavit, the respondent no.3 has tried to justify his arbitrary action and clear breach of statutory duty cast upon him as well as the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. In this regard, it would be appropriate to refer to the provisions of Sections 107, 111 and 116 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973, which are reproduced below: 
“107. Security for keeping the peace in other cases. 
(1) When an Executive Magistrate receives information that any person is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquillity or to do any wrongful act that may probably occasion a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquillity and is of opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding, he may, in the manner hereinafter provided, require such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond, with or without sureties, for keeping the peace for such period, not exceeding one year, as the Magistrate thinks fit.
(2) Proceedings under this section may be taken before any Executive Magistrate when either the place where the breach of the peace or disturbance is apprehended is within his local jurisdiction or there is within such jurisdiction a person who is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquillity or to do any wrongful act as aforesaid beyond such jurisdiction. 
“111. Order to be made. When a Magistrate acting under section 107, section 108, section 109 or section 110, deems it necessary to require any person to show cause under such section, he shall make an order in writing, setting forth the substance of the information received, the amount of the bond to be executed, the term for which it is to be in force, and the number, character and class of sureties (if any) required.”
“116. Inquiry as to truth of information. 
(1) When an order under section 111 has been read or explained under section 112 to a person present in Court, or when any person appears or is brought before a Magistrate in compliance with, or in execution of, a summons or warrant, issued under section 113, the Magistrate shall proceed to inquire into the truth of the information upon which action has been taken, and to take such further evidence as may appear necessary.
(2) Such inquiry shall be made, as nearly as may be practicable, in the manner hereinafter prescribed for conducting trial and recording evidence in summons- cases.
(3) After the commencement, and before the completion, of the inquiry under sub- section (1), the Magistrate, if he considers that immediate measures are necessary for the prevention of a breach of the peace or disturbance of the public tranquillity or the commission of any offence or for the public safety, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, direct the person in respect of whom the order under section 111 has been made to execute a bond, with or without sureties, for keeping the peace or maintaining good behaviour until the conclusion of the inquiry, and may detain him in custody until such bond is executed or, in default of execution, until the inquiry is concluded: Provided that- 
(a) no person against whom proceedings are not being taken under section 108, section 109, or section 110 shall be directed to execute a bond for maintaining good behaviour;
(b) the conditions of such bond, whether as to the amount thereof or as to the provision of sureties or the number thereof or the pecuniary extent of their liability, shall not be more onerous than those specified in the order under section 111. 
(4) For the purposes of this section the fact that a person is an habitual offender or is so desperate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security hazardous to the community may be proved by evidence of general repute or otherwise.
(5) Where two or more persons have been associated together in the matter under inquiry, they may be dealt with in the same or separate inquiries as the Magistrate shall think just. 
(6) The inquiry under this section shall be completed within a period of six months from the date of its commencement, and if such inquiry is not so completed, the proceedings under this Chapter shall, on the expiry of the said period, stand terminated unless, for special reasons to be recorded in writing, the Magistrate otherwise directs: Provided that where any person has been kept in detention pending such inquiry, the proceeding against that person, unless terminated earlier, shall stand terminated on the expiry of a period of six months of such detention. 
(7) Where any direction is made under sub- section (6) permitting the continuance of proceedings, the Sessions Judge may, on an application made to him by the aggrieved party, vacate such direction if he is satisfied that it was not based on any special reason or was perverse.””
For the sake of clarity, the Bench then lays bare in para 12 that, “Section 107 Cr.P.C. requires the Magistrate receiving the information that any person is likely to commit a breach of peace or disturb the public tranquillity or to do any wrongful act that may probably occasion a breach of peace or disturb the public tranquility and is of opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding, he may, in the manner provided, require such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond, with or without sureties, for keeping the peace for such period, not exceeding one year, as the Magistrate thinks fit. Perusal of the order dated 08.10.2020, passed by the respondent no.3 would reveal that there is no such satisfaction recorded by the respondent no.3. The aforesaid order dated 08.10.2020 would further reveal that the respondent no.3 has not required the petitioners to show cause that why they should not be ordered to execute a bond with or without sureties. Thus, the respondent no.3 has committed clear breach of mandate of Section 107 Cr.P.C.”
Simply put, the Bench then states in para 13 that, “Section 111 Cr.P.C. provides that when a Magistrate acting under section 107, section 108, section 109 or section 110, deems it necessary to require any person to show cause under such section, he shall make an order in writing, setting forth (i) the substance of the information received, (ii) the amount of the bond to be executed, (iii) the term for which it is to be in force, and (iv) the number, character and class of sureties (if any) required. These necessary ingredients of Section 111 Cr.P.C. are totally absent in the order dated 08.10.2020 passed by the respondent no.3. Thus, it is evident on record that the respondent no.3 has acted arbitrarily and illegally.” 
Be it noted, the Bench then seeks to point out in para 14 that, “It would further be relevant to note that admittedly the petitioners have submitted personal bond on 12.10.2020 although the order passed by the respondent no.3 dated 08.10.2020 does not specify the substance of the information received, the amount of the bond to be executed, the term for which it is to be in force, and the number, character and class of sureties, if any, required. Despite submission of personal bond and other papers on 12.10.2020 by the petitioners before the respondent no.3, they were not released by the respondent no.3 and that too against his own order dated 08.10.2020 that the petitioners shall be detained till presentation of personal bond/bail bond. Non release of the petitioners by the respondent no.3 even after submission of personal bond/bail bond and other papers, is a clear breach of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, by the respondent no.3 which resulted in illegal detention of the petitioners at least since 12.10.2020 to 21.10.2020.”
Adding more to it, the Bench then puts forth in para 15 that, “On 02.02.2021 this Court noted the statement made by the State Government in Paragraph 15 of the order dated 02.02.2021 as under:
“15. Learned Additional Advocate General and the Secretary, Home, U.P. Lucknow jointly state that the State Government shall develop a mechanism and shall also issue appropriate guidelines so as to ensure that such instances may not repeat again. They further state that the State Government shall consider to grant monetary compensation to the petitioners for breach of their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.””
Furthermore, it is then illustrated in para 16 that, “In pursuance to the statement made on own behalf of the State government as noted in the afore-quoted paragraph 15 of the order dated 02.02.2021, the State Government filed an affidavit of compliance dated 24.03.2021 of Sri Tarun Gauba, Secretary, Home Affairs, Uttar Pradesh, in which in paragraph 10 it has been stated as under :
“That it is most respectfully submitted that the State Government has issued directions to all District Magistrates and all Executive and Special Magistrates who are sub ordinate to the District Magistrates, to exercise their power under Section 107, 116 Cr.P.C. for maintenance of public peace and public tranquility in their territorial jurisdiction. They have been further advised that each and every case under the aforesaid proceedings shall be decided on its own merit with the application of judicial mind and in accordance with the established law & procedure to ensure that the fundamental rights of citizens are protected. The State Government has directed all the District Magistrates of the State to ensure strict compliance of the policy/guideline dated 23rd March, 2021. The State Government has reformulated the earlier policy dated 02.03.2021 and after including the aforementioned issues it has re-issued policy/guideline dated 23rd March, 2021. For kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court copy of policy/guideline dated 23rd March, 2021 is being filed herewith and marked as Annexure-1 to this affidavit.””
While citing the relevant case law, the Bench then remarks in para 18 that, “In the case of Lucknow Development Authority Vs. M.K. Gupta (1994) 1 SCC 243 (Paras 8, 10, 11 and 12 Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that under our Constitution Sovereignty vest in the people. Every limb of the constitutional machinery is obliged to be people oriented. No functionary in exercise of statutory power can claim immunity, except to the extent protected by the statute itself. Public authorities acting in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions oppressively are accountable for their behaviour before authorities created under the statute like the commission or the courts entrusted with responsibility of maintaining the rule of law.”
Most remarkably, the Bench then minces no words to state simply, shortly yet strongly in para 19 that, “An ordinary citizen or a common man is hardly equipped to match the might of the State or its instrumentalities. The servants of the government are also the servants of the people and the use of their power must always be subordinate to their duty of service. A public functionary if he acts maliciously or oppressively and the exercise of power results in harassment and agony then it is not an exercise of power but its abuse. No law provides protection against it. He who is responsible for it must suffer it. But when it arises due to arbitrary or capricious behaviour then it loses its individual character and assumes social significance. Harassment of a common man by public authorities is socially abhorring and legally impermissible. It may harm him personally but the injury to society is far more grievous. Nothing is more damaging than the feeling of helplessness. An ordinary citizen instead of complaining and fighting succumbs to the pressure of undesirable functioning in offices instead of standing against it. Therefore, the award of compensation for harassment by public authorities not only compensates the individual, satisfies him personally but helps in curing social evil.”
Equally remarkable is what is then stipulated in para 20 that, “In a modern society no authority can arrogate to itself the power to act in a manner which is arbitrary. It is unfortunate that matters which require immediate attention linger on and the man in the street is made to run from one end to other with no result. Even in ordinary matters a common man who has neither the political backing nor the financial strength to match the inaction in public oriented departments gets frustrated which erodes the credibility in the system. Where it is found that exercise of discretion was mala fide and the complainant is entitled to compensation for mental and physical harassment then the officer can no more claim to be under protective cover. The test of permissive form of grant is over. It is now imperative and implicit in the exercise of power that it should be for the sake of society. It is the tax payers’ money which is paid for inaction of those who are entrusted under the Act to discharge their duties in accordance with law.”
Most laudably, the Bench then seeks to make it clear in para 21 that, “Once it is found by the competent authority that a complainant is entitled for compensation for inaction of those who are entrusted under the Act to discharge their duties in accordance with law, then payment of the amount may be made to the complainant from the public fund immediately but it may be recovered from those who are found responsible for such unparadonable behaviour. This legal position is reflected from the law laid down by the Apex Court in Lucknow Development Authority’s case (supra). In the said case it was further observed by the Apex Court that the Administrative law of accountability of public authorities or their arbitrary and even ultra vires actions has taken many strides and it is now accepted both by this Court and English Courts that State is liable to compensate for loss or injury suffered by a citizen due to arbitrary action of its employees.”
Equally commendable is that while citing all the relevant case laws, the Bench then states in para 22 that, “The legal principles as enumerated in foregoing paragraphs Nos. 18, 19, 20 & 21 also finds support of the law laid down by Hon’ble Courts in the case of Lucknow Development Authority (supra); Jay Laxmi Salt Works (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat (1994) 4 SCC 1; N. Nagendra Rao & Co. Vs. State of A.P. (1994) 6 SCC 205; State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Kanchanmala Vijaysing Shirke and others (1995) 5 SCC 659; Chief Conservator of Forests and another (1996) 2 SCC 293; S.P. Goel vs Collector Of Stamps, Delhi (1996) 1 SCC 573; Common Cause A. Registered Society Vs. Union of India JT 1999 (5) SC 237: AIR 1999 SC 2979; Shiv Sagar Tiwari Vs. Union of India and others (1996) 6 SCC 558; Chairman, Railway Board and others Vs. Chandrima Das (Mrs.) and others (2000) 2 SCC 465; State of A.P. Vs. Challa Ramkrishna Reddy and others (2000) 5 SCC 712; Research Foundation for Science (10) Vs. Union of India (2005) 13 SCC 659; M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others (2006) 3 SCC 399; Union of India Vs. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar and others (2008) 9 SCC 527; Action Committee, Unaided Private Schools and others Vs. Director of Education, Delhi and others (2009) 10 SCC; Delhi Jal Board Vs. National Campaign for Dignity and Rights of Sewerage and Allied Workers and others (2011) 8 SCC 568; Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Delhi Vs. Uphaar Tragedy Victims Association and others (2011) 14 SCC 481.”
On a candid note, the Bench then is generous enough to observe in para 23 that, “We record our appreciation for the State Government to take the afore-quoted policy decision dated 23.03.2021 for payment of compensation of Rs.25,000/- for illegal detention of any citizen by any Officer of the State Government and initiation of disciplinary proceedings against such officer. Since the State Government itself has taken a policy decision and has paid compensation to the petitioners herein, therefore, no further direction for payment of compensation is required to be issued in the present writ petition.”
To put it shortly, the Bench then holds in para 24 that, “In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions :- 
(i) The State Government shall ensure that the provisions of the Cr.P.C. as referred in the policy decision dated 23.03.2021 are strictly followed/observed by all the concerned officers. 
(ii) The State Government shall further ensure that paragraph 12 of the policy decision dated 23.03.2021 is strictly implemented.
(iii) The State Government shall publish Para 12 of its Policy decision dated 23.03.2021 in all largely circulated National Level Newspaper having circulation in the State of Uttar Pradesh and shall also display it on display board at prominent places within public view, in all blocks, Tehsil Headquarters, Police Stations and in campus of District Collectorate in the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh. 
(iv) Copy of this order shall be sent by the State Government to all District level and Tehsil level Bar Associations in the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh.”
Finally, the Bench then holds in para 25 that, “Let a copy of this order be sent by the Registrar General of this Court to the Chief Secretary of the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Additional Chief Secretary, Home, for strict compliance.”
In essence, it is a judgment which deserves generous praise straight from the bottom of heart. It mandates that persons under illegal detention shall be paid compensation by the State. Illegal detention which is the worst violation of human rights and so also custodial torture which we keep hearing time and again not sparing even senior Army Officers as we saw in case of Lt Col Shrikant Purohit who was illegally arrested, illegally detained and illegally tortured most brutally deserves the most stringent punishment by all those who were behind it as we are now leaving in a democratic India and not in British India where Britishers called Indians as “You bloody Indians” as was pointed out once by famous cricketer Farrukh Engineer! 
There has to be zero tolerance against all forms of custodial violence and illegal detention by those in uniform! Of course, the most dangerous, most despicable and most dastardly tendency to protect men in uniform who commit the worst crime leaving behind even criminals has to be shunned completely now and they too like others have to be taken to task at the earliest if we really want our country to be truly democratic whenever they do anything wrong! No denying!
Sanjeev Sirohi

HOW TO CHANGE DENIM WITH STYLISH SUMMER ALTERNATIVES

The pandemic has forced us to stay at home for years. It’s almost impossible to stay calm at home around the clock, and the sweaty heat doesn’t make it any easier for us. It is best to stay away from denim and other thick fabrics at this time of year. With the advent of so many natural and sustainable fabrics in the market, designers experiment a lot with different designs and silhouettes made for the hot summer. So let’s find some summery denim alternatives that suit your comfort and style. Carrying trousers are the good vinyl trousers. Since we all started at WFH, we haven’t worn formal trousers, which gives the trousers a boost.Paperbag shorts for an oversized look Probably the most comfortable way to stay in for the summer. Paperbag shorts are the right alternative to high-waist shorts. This pair consists of a combination of breathable cotton, a high-waisted paperbag-up and a drawstring at the front. An oversized top completes the look with the inside of the draped top.

Breathable swimwear and a bralette A cut-out pinnacle or a bralette with long leg trousers is great Combination. This look is for anyone who doesn’t have to reveal a lot of skin.

The high-waisted palazzo also hides the lower abdomen.It offers the spirit of a super torso and looks very stylish. Coordinated set of crop pinnacle and shorts. These combos are very fashionable. Light and gorgeous in fashion. The long-sleeved advertisement with the top of the crop with a tie at the waist looks elegant. Tie shorts are all you could want in your summer wardrobe. The matching ensemble is a nicer option for warm weather over full pants. Surely the alternatives have given you less and less reason to position yourself in a partner, you may even wonder whether you would rather stick to the above options than love jeans.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST MEN

Abusing is something which is injurious, harmful or offensive to a person, animal or environment. Abuse is mainly of three types- Social, domestic and sexual violences.
Social abuse is something that prevents a person from keeping contact with friends, relatives.
Sexual abuse is the harrasment that is experienced sexually. Sexual harassment includes molestation, abusive sexual behaviour by one person upon another. Any sexual behaviour done by one person without another person’s consent is molestation. Trying to have sexual contact against another person’s consent is rape. (Woman rapes a man )- this percentage is much more than (man rapes a woman).
Domestic Violence is the torture a person face mentally, physically, psychologically, emotionally etc.
The most common abuse a person face nowadays are sexual harassment and domestic violence. Domestic violence is a crime but the laws vary between jurisdiction for men and women.

Domestic Violence Against Men:-
Domestic violence occurs when a family member, partner or ex-partner dominates the other one mentally, physically or psychologically.In maximum cases the victim is ashamed or afraid of further abuse.For this reason they don’t report the abuse. Domestic Violence has different ways of occurrence but the effects are always negative.
We all know as standard “man” is the abuser and woman is “abused”. There are many men who are suffering from domestic violence emotionally and physically from their partner. Domestic violence against men remains unrecognised in most cases since men are scared of embarrassment, lack support. Due to these stereotypical male images, men don’t have the courage to file a report against domestic violence. Society is aware of male victims but treats him as a joke thus making him feel insecure, ridiculous and embarrassed.
MYTHS :
There are certain myths regarding violence. We always expect men to take all the responsibilities of their actions. When a female is violent society has lots of excuses to support the woman like postnatal depression, mood swings, stress etc but when a man gives the same excuse we do not accept it even if he is really suffering from depression and stress.
PARENTING:
When a woman is violent we don’t say she is a bad mother but when the same thing happens with a man we automatically assume him to be a bad parent. If a man is a victim of domestic violence , during the separation with his partner the woman gets the legal custody of their children. The man is left with no other option except to leave the house. So we can also say that fear of losing the child is also a reason for which a man doesn’t file a report against domestic violence.
WHY DO MAN STAY IN ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIP?
This question cannot be answered very easily. If a man is harassed physically or sexually by his wife or partner, no one will believe him.No one will support him and make him feel ridiculous.
There are many reasons why men don’t report abuse. They are as follows-
Fear of disbelief
Fear of being denied access to their children
Fear of being judged
Fear of revenge by the abuser
Fear of false allegations against him
Fear of being left alone and homeless.
EFFECTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON MEN :
The adverse effects of the abuse can be very long lasting. Men who have been abused by someone often suffer from different traumas like low self-esteem, anger, sleeping problems, inability to work, depression, joblessness. Sometimes this effects become so depressing that it may destroy a man’s career causing him to attempt suicide.
UNRECOGNITION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST MAN :
Violence against men remains unrecognised because of many reasons such as-
It has taken years of advocacy and support to encourage women to report the abuse but literally no one is there to support a man.
People don’t even think that men can also be victims of domestic violence. For this reason many men don’t even attempt to report the situation.
In some cases physical damage becomes less apparent for which we do not believe them.
Even if they report, they don’t get any support and help from anyone, not even the social workers or the law and most importantly they are not believed by anyone.
SOCIETY REACTION :
If men file a report against the violence they are met with discrimination and disbelief. Usually people’s reaction would be about men’s size, that he may deserve this for his previous dids and all. Even the police don’t believe the man and say in support of a woman.
CONCLUSION :
Even if a man takes various actions to stop domestic violence, these attacks will not stop. Abused men are not cowards but their actions can be misinterpreted. It is a pity to see a strongest man succumb to the old fashioned way of thinking. If they report they will be seen as well. Laws should be applied regardless of gender so that many women will think twice before abusing a man if they knew they could be arrested like any men in the same situation.
Domestic Violence against men is a topic that many people will not be willing to start. Abuse is abuse no matter to whom it is done. Men are disadvantaged and the hurdles they are facing are almost impossible to overcome.
So to stop Domestic Violence against men at first we have to believe them.They are also human beings and they do feel depressed. So we must not be biased to a particular gender and must not ignore men’s emotions. Social workers and police must be educated about the fact that men can also be a victim.
Maybe this could change the lives of many men who are the victims of domestic violence.

@track2traininginstitute @track2traininginstitute

Domestic Violence against men

As standards “men” are the abusers and “women” are the abused. This is not always true.

Simple Weight Loss Workout Plans from Beginner to Advanced Exercisers

Are you trying to lose weight and tone your body? You will lose weight more effectively if you create a weekly weight loss exercise plan. When creating a weight loss training plan, there is no last guess when it comes down to it. Time to Exercise And if workouts are planned in advance, the more likely you will complete them and reach your ideal weight.

Plan for Beginners
The department of health recommends that you get 150- three hundred mins in step with a week of moderate-depth workout in step with week. This would possibly sound like a lot, however in case you spoil it down it is handiest approximately 20 or half-hour in step with day. Plus while you are first beginning your weight reduction exercise plan, you may begin on the low give up of that recommendation.

As a beginning-stage exerciser, your principal aim must virtually be to finish a few workout on maximum days of the week. Choose sports which you experience and which are smooth in an effort to do.
Walking is a amazing desire for lots new exercisers due to the fact you may do it nearly everywhere and it does not require any fancy equipment. Online workout routines and domestic energy education workout routines are exact on your frame, too.
Before you begin any weekly workout application you must test together along with your medical doctor and observe his different suggestions or regulations to live healthy. Then you may integrate numerous distinctive sports to create a full-frame weightloss exercise time table to shed pounds and burn fat.

Monday (half-hour): Moderate depth walk
Tuesday (20 mins): Simple domestic energy education exercise
Wednesday (half-hour): Moderate depth walk
Thursday (20 mins): Simple domestic energy education exercise
Friday (30) mins): Moderate depth walk
Saturday (20 mins): Online rest yoga
Sunday: (half-hour) Fun and smooth cross-education day (motorcycle ride, swim or on line aerobics class)

Total weekly workout: one hundred eighty mins.

Plan for Advanced Exercisers
As you get more potent and extra fit, you may be capable of uploading a couple of minutes to every of your day by day workout routines.

Your weight reduction exercise plan needs to additionally get more difficult as your degree of health increases. The fine workout routines to burn fats are extra hard to do. As you get more potent you may be capable of encompass them for your exercising program (so long as you’re healthful sufficient for lively activity).

This pattern weekly exercising habitual consists of electricity schooling to construct muscle, cardio workout routines to burn fats and versatility schooling to lessen strain and preserve your frame health..

Monday (forty five mins): Moderate depth circuit exercise with weights
Tuesday (20 mins): HIIT exercise at domestic or outdoors
Wednesday (30 mins): Easy healing day stretch and walk
Thursday (forty five mins): Moderate depth circuit exercise with weights
Friday (20 mins): High-depth day walk/run intervals
Saturday (30 mins): healing day rest yoga
Sunday (seventy five mins): moderate-depth jog, hike or walk
Total weekly exercising: 265 mins

When You’ll See Results
Many exercisers need to recognise how lengthy they ought to persist with their weekly exercise plan earlier than they start to see weight reduction results. The solution depends.
If you figure out on a everyday basis, with the aid of using the second one week you ought to start to see enhancements withinside the manner your frame appears and feels. Of course, the quantity of weight you lose can even depend upon developing the proper electricity stability for weight reduction (i.e. ensuring you burn greater energy than you consume).

To make your exercise plan greater effective, ensure you integrate your exercising software with a healthful weight loss plan complete of lean protein, fruits, and veggies. One of the maximum not unusualplace errors that dieters make is to overeat after exercising. Don’t fall into that trap. Exercise every day, screen the range of energy you devour each day, and live heading in the right direction to get results.


If you take part in an entire and balanced exercising software, you ought to see full-size enhancements to your frame composition, size, and weight in a single to 3 months. You may also even attain your aim weight in that length of time. But recollect that to hold the burden off, you’ll want to retain exercising on an ordinary basis. Make modifications on your weekly exercise plan and locate new sports which you experience to live healthful and fit.

All about Mucormycosis or black fungus

What is Mucormycosis or black fungus?

Mucormycosis or black fungus is a type of fungal infection. It’s relatively rare, but also very serious.

According to an advisory from the “Indian Council of Medical Research”, the recovered or recovering Covid-19 patients going through these following conditions could be at high-risk of developing this fungus:
• Uncontrollable Diabetes
• Weakened immune system due to the use  of steroids
• Post organ transplant/ cancer
• Voriconazole therapy (used to treat severe fungal infection)
• Protracted hospital stay.

In recent times, this infection is on the verge of spreading rapidly among the patients who have either recovered from covid or are recovering. Moreover, it’s high time for the diabetic patients or the people with low immunity to be on guard against this.

It’s important to get treatment as soon as possible. If left untreated, mucormycosis can be fatal.

What are the various Symptoms of Mucormycosis?

Starting as a skin infection in air pockets behind forehead, nose, or in between eyes and teeth, this disease starts spreading to eyes, lungs or even to the brain. Furthermore, it leads to blackening or discoloration over the nose, blurred or double vision, Chest pain, Breathing difficulties and also coughing of blood.
Although, Indian Council of Medical Research has made it clear that not all cases of nose blockage should be mistaken with Mucormycosis or black fungus, particularly during/after treatment of Covid-19 patients. One must seek medical help for detecting fungus as early as possible.

How is it related to Covid-19?

A set of microorganisms known as “mucormycetes” is responsible for causing this disease. These are present naturally in our environment, seen commonly in soil and decaying organic matter like leaves, compost and piles.

Our body is immunized to fight such deadly fungus but due to the steroids and intake of certain medicines used in the treatment of covid-19 , our immunity is suppressed for the time being resulting in a high-risk of getting infected with mucormycosis or black fungus.

The disease is uncommon in those not having diabetes but can be fatal if not treated promptly. Chances of recovery depend upon early diagnosis and treatment.

How it’s treated?

The treatment of Mucormycosis can take about four to six weeks.
The treatment starts from the process of identifying the disease. It’s better to have diagnosed it at an early stage as this fungus continues to get more fatal with each passing moment. Mucormycosis begins with skin infection in air pockets behind forehead, nose, or in between eyes and teeth. Furthermore, results in blackening or discoloration over the nose, blurred or double vision, Chest pain, Breathing difficulties and also coughing of blood.

To stop the spreading of black fungus and to end it, the patient might have to proceed for surgery as soon as possible. During surgery, the organs which are infected with fungus are to be removed. This may result in the loss of upper jaw or eyes.

Recently, doctors of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS) reported to have surgically removed a cricket ball-sized black fungus or Mucormycosis from the brain of a 60 year old on Friday.
A team led by Dr Brajesh Kumar operated on the patient with such precision that his eyes were not affected.

Be on guard

Reported around 31000 cases in last three weeks, the black fungus is rising on a all-time high rate. Nearly 2100 deaths have been reported so far from this fungus. It’s better to take preventive measures at this time.
It is advised that after recovering from COVID-19, one should closely monitor and should not miss any warning signs and symptoms mentioned above, as the fungal infection is found to emerge even weeks or months after recovery. One should make judicial use of steroids as per doctor’s advice to avoid risk of infection. Early detection of the disease can ease the treatment of the fungal infection.

Best Strategy for Long-Term Mutual Funds Investments

Mutual funds really help us to achieve our long-term goals. Everyone says that mutual fund investments are better when done over a longer period of time. But the question is: how long does the long run last? In this article today, we’re going to discuss the long-term strategy. Fixed Term Mutual Fund Investments: Mutual funds operate on the compound effect principle, which means that money generates money and it usually does so over a period of time. The longer you keep your money invested, the more benefits you can expect. Well, we think it not only takes time, but also a little homework and a good strategy.

What do we mean by “long-term”?
The word long term refers to something that lasts longer, but nobody tells us how long long term is. According to investors, investors generally refer to any investment of more than 3 to 5 years as long-term. However, this can vary as a person who is now in their thirties wants to keep their money invested for the next 30 years until retirement. Annuals to take advantage of this investment as you will be making money with the money. If you give your investment time, your wealth will be valued and grow over time.

Why are long-term mutual fund investments better?
Let’s take a quick example: A mutual fund that has a historic 10-year return of 12%. A person who invested 10,000 in this mutual fund ten years ago now has 22,000 (which is more than double) as a return on investment. To say about past accomplishments we should get carried away with it as the future cannot be predicted, but at the same time history gives us a clear idea of what the future holds. So the math here shows us why long-term mutual fund investing is good.

Strategy for Building a Long Term Portfolio

DEFINE YOUR LONG TERM PERIOD
The first and foremost strategy is to set your goal. Mutual funds work best for you when you decide on a goal that you want to achieve. There may be a different portfolio for a different need, and you can use several of them depending on what you want from your investments. For example, if you want to create a pension corpus. It depends on how many years there are until retirement. You can also create a separate portfolio for your children’s education that will help you streamline your investments and strategically build a secure future, say 15 years later. Investing in long-term mutual funds can be a great option.

FIND YOUR INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Not only can we invest in long-term mutual funds, we also need to research which investment best suits our needs. When it comes to mutual funds, we have several categories like equity, debt, etc. We all know that equity funds are riskier than debt funds, but there are more than 10 different funds that fall under the top fund category. With equity funds, for example, small-cap funds are riskier. as a large-cap fund. Similarly, when it comes to bond funds, credit risk funds are riskier than most other fund categories.

I never thought that I would write blogs

I never thought that I would write blogs.
I am passionate about film making so I never felt that blogs can help me in this. So I used to watch only movies and shows, and learn about film making through YouTube and online, I have never worked on any project but I will probably apply for internship somewhere in some time.
I did not read blogs earlier but once I saw a blog on my google feed which was about films recommendation, then I read it, which had short explanation of some movies.
I got to know a lot by reading it.
Since then I started reading blogs regularly and now I can say that I understand by reading blogs in less time than what I learn from any video, it totally depends on myself how quickly you can read. Ho.
One advantage of blogs is that the way YouTube videos come in between, they are saved in blogs.

Gujarat: 7.97 lakh COVID patients recovered so far in state, 481 new cases recorded

Gujarat has recorded 481 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday. 1526 patients recovered during the last 24 hours and were discharged from the hospitals. AIR Ahmedabad correspondent reports that total 7 lakh 97 thousand 734 patients have been recovered from COVID-19 in Gujarat till now. The recovery rate further improved and reached up to 97.36 percent.

Maximum 69 new cases of COVID-19 reported from Ahmedabad, while Surat recorded 62 new cases. 9 patients lost their lives yesterday. Gujarat has now 11,657 active cases at present, out of which 296 patients are on ventilator. Meanwhile, 2 lakh 86 thousand 459 persons have been vaccinated in the state yesterday. With this, more than one crore 97 lakh persons have been vaccinated in Gujarat till now.

Himachal Pradesh: Corona Curfew extended till further orders with relaxations

Corona Curfew in Himachal Pradesh has been extended till further orders with more relaxations. The buses within the state will play with 50 per cent occupancy. Timing of the opening of shops has been increased from 9 am to 5 pm from Monday. Earlier the shops were allowed to open from 9 am to 2 pm. However, the shops except those of essential commodities will remain closed on Saturdays and Sundays.

The decision to extend the curfew was taken yesterday at a cabinet meeting chaired by Chief Minister Jai Ram Thakur. The curfew will continue from 5 pm to 5 am in the state till further orders. It was also decided that the offices will function with 50 per cent of staff from Monday. All the medical colleges, ayurvedic colleges and dental colleges will open from June 23. Pharmacy and nursing schools will open from June 28. Now there will be no requirement of RT-PCR negative tests for entering in the state.

Monsoon likely to reach Delhi by 15th June, 12 days ahead of schedule

Southwest monsoon is likely to reach Delhi by 15th of June, 12 days before its usual date of June 27. India Meteorological Department (IMD) said, conditions are favourable for an early onset of monsoon in Delhi.

It said, under favourable meteorological conditions, monsoon is likely to advance over the entire country outside south Rajasthan and Kutch region of Gujarat during the next five-six days. In 2008 also, monsoon had reached Delhi on June 15. Last year, monsoon had covered the entire country by June 29, seven days before the usual date of July 8.

Tamil Nadu govt extends lockdown in state till 21st june

Tamil Nadu government has extended the lockdown in the state till 21st of this month with more relaxations. The State Government has allowed functioning of beauty parlour, saloons and spas without air conditioning facilities with 50 per cent staff and customers. Government managed parks and play grounds will be opened from morning 6 to 9 p.m. only for walking exercise.

Opthalmologist and mechanic shops will be opened from morning 9 to 2 p.m., agricultural shops, handicrafts manufacturers are allowed to function from morning 6 to 5 p.m. TASMAC will be opened from morning ten to evening five o’clock. Mobile phones and accessories, building materials, household furniture and utensils shops will be opened from morning 9 to afternoon two. Administrative activities on admission to schools, colleges and Universities have been allowed.

Export manufacturing units are allowed to function with 50 per cent staff. Industries can provide identity cards to their workers with e-registration. IT offices will be allowed to function with 20 or ten per cent workers. Housing finance companies and Non-Banking Financial Institutions can work with 33 per cent staff. Thermal screening, social distancing, face masks and hand sanitising have been made mandatory in all the activities.

Maharashtra CM asks Sarpanchs to use local dialect, folk arts to spread COVID awareness

Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray has asked village heads or Sarpanchs to make a resolve that will strictly implement COVID-appropriate behaviour and protocol to prevent the possibility of a third wave of coronavirus infections. While addressing a virtual meeting with the village heads of Aurangabad, Nagpur and Amravati region, Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray said that sarpanchs must use the local dialect and folk arts to spread awareness regarding Covid related guidelines.

He also praised the village heads for their efforts to keep their respective villages Covid-free and for optimal use of social media like Whatsapp. The Chief Minister informed the village heads that vaccine doses will be distributed as per availability and the same must be used as vaccines have proved effective in lowering the risk of infection.

He said that the local teams must be formed to keep a tab on the health conditions and infrastructure requirements to minimise the need for hospitalisation. Also present in the meeting, state Rural Development Minister Hasan Mushriff reminded the village heads about the Covid-free village contests, urging them to make it a people’s movement.

Bihar govt set target of vaccinating another six crore people in next 6 months

Bihar government has set an ambitious target of vaccinating another six crore people in next six months. This was stated by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar after reviewing the status of covid vaccination in the state. He said, over one crore 18 lakh 52 thousand people have been vaccinated in the state so far. Out of these, 24 lakh 32 thousand people are from the age group of 18 to 44 years.

Mr Kumar ordered to involve all state government employees in the vaccination drive. The Chief Minister instructed health officials to run the vaccination campaign on regular basis and use different mediums to educate people about its benefits. The CM said people should be asked to get themselves vaccinated and ensure vaccination of each member of the family. The vaccinated people must motivate their neighbours for taking jabs.

Why Should MPs Be Paid For Disrupting Parliament?

 Let me say first and foremost: I am hugely dismayed, dejected and disappointed to see how Member of Parliaments (MPs) are disrupting Parliament time and again and not allowing Parliament to function smoothly. This under no circumstances can ever be justified. These MPs don’t bother that how much money of taxpayer is getting wasted when they repeatedly adjourn Parliament and even while in session don’t allow it to function smoothly by disrupting Parliament on one pretext or the other.

                                               While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that I am not alone in feeling so. This is the overwhelming opinion of majority of citizens of India. To top it all, even the first person of India – former President late Pranab Mukherjee  had too while he was President had openly and very strongly expressed his huge seething anger over the logjam in Parliament and said that the House is not a place for dharna and disruptions which amounts to “gagging of majority” by the minority.
                                         For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that late Pranab Mukherjee also minced no words in making it absolutely clear that, “Three Ds are essential in a democracy and these are debate, dissension and decision. But there was no fourth D. At least my teacher did not tell me that there is a fourth D which is disruption”. His observations assumes huge significance as both the Houses of Parliament saw proceedings being washed out yet again on December 9 with the Opposition demanding the Government mourn the deaths caused due to hardships after demonetisation. Nothing on earth can be more unfortunate than this that time and again Parliament is witnessing disruption and yet MPs time and again themselves approve 100% or 200% or 300% hike in their pay as they have the unfettered licence to hike their salaries whenever they want. No one else decides for them as to how much pay they should receive. It is they themselves who decide for themselves as to how much pay they should receive.
                                                 Be it noted, the Opposition leaders also observed one month of the monetisation decision by wearing black bands and staging protests in Parliament complex. Speaking on ‘Electoral reforms for a stronger democracy’ on the occasion of Defence Estates lecture, the President Dr Pranab Mukherjee said unequivocally that, “Disruption is totally unacceptable in Parliamentary system. People send representatives to speak and not to sit on dharna and not to create any trouble on the floor.” Very rightly said and there can be no denying this!
                                                Let me be direct in asking: Why MPs have the freedom to disrupt Parliament? Why are they not permanently barred from entering Parliament if they disrupt Parliament? Why MPs have the colonial power to retain houses at taxpayer’s expense even after they complete their tenure? Why MPs salary is not deducted if they disrupt Parliament? Why are MPs not fined if they disrupt Parliament? Same is the case with MLAs when they brashly disrupt State Assemblies!
                               Truth be told, why for acquiring any government job there is a proper police verification and even if one case is found registered in any police station the concerned candidate is debarred from joining any government service but for becoming an MP or MLA you can be a Phoolan Devi and murder many and still enter Parliament and term cases as “politically motivated”? Why MPs are not made to disclose all their assets and why their unaccounted assets not seized immediately? Why MPs are not made to disclose all donations they receive publicly and same is the case with political parties? Why they are exempted from RTI Act?
                     To put things in perspective, himself a veteran Parliamentarian before becoming the President, Dr Pranab Mukherjee palpably anguished by the manner in which the winter session of Parliament has been stalled due to disruptions made no bones in saying from his inner heart that, “Disruption means you are hurt, you are gagging majority. Majority never participates in this disruption. Only minority comes to the well, shouts slogans, stop the proceedings and creates a situation in which the Chair has no option but to adjourn the House. This is totally unacceptable.” Those minority who disrupt Parliament must seriously introspect on what the President has said! But they care a damn and that alone explains why they repeatedly disrupt Parliament!
                                           As it turned out, the President noted that Parliament is in session for only a few weeks in a year. Rest is all washed out in disruption. Now you can imagine how many crores and crores of rupees are wasted for no purpose by MPs and they have no regret in doing so and will also give hundred reasons to justify it. You just cannot convince them under any circumstances because they think that what they do is right and rest all others are wrong including the President!
                                        For all practical purposes, it is in national interest for Parliament to function normally so that all important Bills are passed and meaningful discussion takes place in Parliament. But what we hear in Parliament is nothing but shouting and slanging matches except on few occasions when few members speak on serious issues and they too are frequently disrupted. When will this end?
                           While maintaining that he was not targeting any single party or individuals, the President was quite forthright in saying that the responsibility of allowing Parliament to function is of everyone. He said that, “Fact remains that this (disruption) has become a practice which should not be acceptable at all. Whatever be the differences, we have the opportunity to speak our mind, to speak freely and no court can interfere in what I say on the floor of the House.” Why can’t MPs pay heed to what President Dr Pranab Mukherjee has said with a heavy heart?
                                                   To say the least, President Dr Pranab Mukherjee pointed out that even if a member is leveling an allegation against someone, no court can prosecute him because he has said so on the floor of the House. President  minced no words in making it clear to all MPs that, “This type of freedom should not be misused by causing disruption”. It is high time and now this freedom must be ended once and for all so that MPs are also held liable just like any other ordinary individual!
                                                Recalling the past days, President pointed out that, “When India’s budget was paltry and when outlay of Five Year Plan was very meager, two-thirds of time of Parliament was devoted to discussing money and finance. This was because elected representatives in Lok Sabha have singular right under which no tax can be imposed without their approval and neither can any money be withdrawn from the consolidated fund without their approval. No amount can be spent from the consolidated fund of India without the approval of Parliament. But if these issues are not debated, when you are spending Rs 16 lakh to Rs 18 lakh crore per year, if these things are not properly scrutinized on the floor of the House, not debated, not discussed, I do not see that our parliamentary system can be very effective and can proceed successfully.”
                                            What  an unbeatable irony that our former President late Dr Pranab Mukherjee  said with a very heavy heart that, “Don’t disrupt Parliament. For God’s sake, do your job.” But Opposition is just not prepared to abide by what he is appealing them to. Not just this, even the Government is no less and they too want that MPs should have unfettered licence to do what they want to do and as they like to do and under no circumstances should they be punished in any manner. Nor should they be thrown out of Parliament nor should their salary be deducted nor should they be punished in any other manner, nor should there be any educational qualifications for them nor should they be debarred even if many criminal cases are pending against them!
                      For how long? If any other person does anything slightly wrong especially those in government services they are immediately thrown out but why MPs are above all such rules and regulations? MPs must be made to pay for the disruption they cause and no salary should be given to them under any circumstances for the time they disrupt Parliament. No MP should be allowed to disrupt Parliament and they must be thrown out if they insist on disrupting Parliament and should be permanently barred from entering Parliament which is the highest institution of democracy! This will be the best tribute that we can pay to Parliament! Nothing better than this!
Sanjeev Sirohi,

Academy of Art, Culture and Languages organizes vaccination camp at Jammu for employees, young artists, writers and workers

In the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, as a part of COVID vaccination drive, the Academy of Art, Culture and Languages today organized a vaccination camp at Jammu for the employees, young artists, writers and workers associated with the Academy. AIR Jammu Correspondent reports that as many as 200 young artists and other frontline workers in the age group of 18-44 were vaccinated at the K L Sehgal Hall of the Academy in Jammu.

The artists and others working for the awareness camps and other culture activities got the first dose of the vaccine during the drive. The academy has categorised the artists as a priority group for vaccination as the nature of their duties is such that they come in public contact during duties. The Cultural department has urged all artists working with the Academy of Art, Culture and Languages to come forward for vaccination as it is important for their safety and their families as they have to perform their duties and require protection from the risk of contracting the infection.